Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

사진 속 클라라는 하버드라고 쓰여진 졸업장과 학사모를 쓰고 미소를 짓고 있는 모습이 담겨 있다. `겁` 뮤직비디오는 클라라의 노출 몸매로 시작해 노출 몸매로 끝난다. Kr › news › hotissues클라라, 노출 사진 회장에게 왜 보냈나. 클라라 노출,사진모음 클라라 요가 수영복이 잘어울리는 클라라 이건 클라라 사진은 아니지만 정말 몸매가 완벽해서 한번 올려봤습니다 청순한 웃음.

화학사고 발생 시 행동요령에 대해 잘못 설명한 것은

특히 앞부분이 깊게 파인 잠옷으로 가슴골이 고스란히 드러나 보는 이들을 민망했다.. 클라라 노출,사진모음 클라라 요가 수영복이 잘어울리는 클라라 이건 클라라 사진은 아니지만 정말 몸매가 완벽해서 한번 올려봤습니다 청순한 웃음..

히토미 들어

02 2057 0 사진방송 캡처 방송인 클라라가 의상 논란으로 화제가 되고있다. 지난 19일 폴라리스 관계자는 sbs연예뉴스 취재진과의 전화통화에서 해당 메시지가 어떻게 모 매체에 들어갔는지 알 수 없다, 동아닷컴 방송인 클라라가 아찔한 반라 뒤태를 노출했다. 서울뉴시스 신효령 기자 배우 클라라가 성형 의혹에 대해 심경을 털어놨다.

배우 클라라가 성형 의혹이 불거진 후 입을 열었다, Com › article › 2013081533287클라라, 샤워 후 수건만 두르고&mldr. Kr › entertain › celebritytopic클라라, 홍콩 호텔서 아찔 원피스&mldr. 폴라리스는 문자 내용이 공개된 것에 대해 의도한 바가 아니다라고 말하며 유출 경로는 확인할 수 없다고 말했다. 19일 연예매체 디스패치는 단독 보도를 통해 폴라리스 회장 이모씨와 클라라가 나눈 문자메시지 내용을 입수해 공개했다.

이에 대해 클라라 측 관계자는 한 매체를 통해 폴라리스 측의 일방적인 공개 부분이며, 현재 홍콩에 체류 중이라 미처 확인하지 못했다. 클라라는 속옷을 연상케 하는 의상들을 선보이며 야릇함을 더하는, 같은 날 공개된 클라라 겁 뮤직비디오에는 클라라의 섹시하면서도 청순한 매력이 제대로 드러났다.

해당 내용을 살펴보면, 클라라는 먼저 자신의 언더웨어 화보를 이 회장에게 보내는 등의 전후 관계가 드러난다, 폴라리스는 문자 내용이 공개된 것에 대해 의도한 바가 아니다라고 말하며 유출 경로는 확인할 수 없다고 말했다, 애교섞인 말투는 물론, 하트 이모티콘도 클라라 혼자 사용했다. 클라라는 지난 22일 자신의 소셜미디어에 한류연예대상. 최근 클라라는 온라인 pc게임 바람의 나라에서 공개한 홍보 영상을 통해 다양한 매력을 뽐냈다. Com › site › data클라라 노출 논란, 지나치게 잦아 vs 자연스러워.

히토미 광고 필터

클라라는 이어 카메라를 향해 인터뷰를 진행. 중국 상하이 구베이 지역 ‘까르푸’2층 식품 할인코너에 오리온 제과의 ‘오감자’가 수북이 진열돼 있다. 서울뉴시스 신효령 기자 배우 클라라가 성형수술 의혹에 대해 민낯을 공개하는 등 정면으로 대응했다. 클라라, 속옷까지 싹 벗었다 노출 사진 ‘깜짝’ 2개월 1 4 허재우 에디터, 클라라는 지난 22일 한류연예대상 한류.

셀럽 투게더 205개의 글 목록열기 이웃 블로거.. 배우 클라라가 성형 의혹에 대해 심경을 털어놨다..

최근 클라라는 온라인 pc게임 바람의 나라에서 공개한 홍보 영상을 통해 다양한 매력을 뽐냈다, Png 「엘리사이 에데스의 파이논, 당신에게 경의를 표합니다. 클라라는 지난 12일 자신의 인스타그램에 홍콩의 한 호텔에서 찍은 사진을 여러 장 올렸다. Kr › article › 16971173클라라 문자의 상대, 이 회장은 누구. 19 1353 조회 6,628 기사 인쇄하기 글자 사이즈 줄이기 글자 사이즈 키우기. 클라라, 가슴노출에 이어 거품 목욕까지 입력 2013.

희서 야동 Com › watchystar clara opens private messages to the public 문자 공개. Kr 티브이데일리 정선욱 기자 클라라가 아찔한 의상으로 눈길을 끌었다. 배우 클라라가 성형 의혹에 대해 심경을 털어놨다. 해당 내용을 살펴보면, 클라라는 먼저 자신의 언더웨어 화보를 이 회장에게 보내는 등의 전후 관계가 드러난다. Kr › news › hotissues클라라, 노출 사진 회장에게 왜 보냈나. 히어하트 추천

흑두 벌칙 그는 해당 의혹에 대해 무심한 반응으로 응대했다. 성적 수치심 발언으로 논란을 빚고 있는 클라라와 소속사 회장의 문자 메시지가 공개되면서 파문을 일으키고 있습니다. 공개된 영상 속에는 클라라가 나체로 침대에 엎드려 하의만을 가린 포즈를 취하고 있다. 19일 연예매체 디스패치는 단독 보도를 통해 폴라리스 회장 이모씨와 클라라가 나눈 문자메시지 내용을 입수해 공개했다. 면서 현재 유출 경로를 확인 중인데 아직 파악하지 못한 상황이라고 설명했다. 히토미 게이 태그

후타바 에마 추천 유출 경로 확인 중배우 클라라와 소송을 진행 중인 폴라리스 엔터테인먼트가 한 매체의 문자 메시지. 유튜브 채널도 운영5하면서 팬들과 소통 중인데, 채널명은 clara lee read more. 공개된 영상 속에는 클라라가 나체로 침대에 엎드려 하의만을 가린 포즈를 취하고 있다. 클라라 노출,사진모음 클라라 요가 네이버 블로그. 클라라는 소속사 회장으로부터 성적 수치심이 들게 하는 문자를 받았다고 주장하고 있다. 황 하나 05년생 디시

히스클리프 키스 짤 사진 속 클라라는 하버드라고 쓰여진 졸업장과 학사모를 쓰고 미소를 짓고 있는 모습이 담겨 있다. 계약을 취소하지 않으면 경찰에 신고하겠다는 취지의 내용증명을 보내 협박했다며 두 사람을 고소했습니다. 클라라 `겁` 뮤직비디오 영상이 누리꾼들의 눈길을 끌고 있다. 클라라 측은 지난해 말 폴라리스 엔터테인먼트를 상대로 계약 효력이 없다는 사실을 확인하기 위한 소송을 제기했다. 앞서 클라라는 지난해 6월 폴라리스와 오는 2018년까지 계약을 맺었지만 회장 이씨가 저녁 술자리를 제안하는 등의 문자 메시지를 보내기 시작하며 성적.

환연 윤녕 대학 클라라 측은 앞서 이미지 타격을 우려해. 클라라는 지난 22일 한류연예대상 한류. 다만 해당 의혹에 별다른 반응을 나타내지 않았다. Com › view › nisx20241223_0003008145클라라, 확 달라진 외모성형 의혹에 민낯 공개. Com › article › 2013081533287클라라, 샤워 후 수건만 두르고&mldr.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.