Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

The part of longsleeve. 피드에 있는 디자인들은 저렴한 금액에 작업 가능합니다. 아트공작소 남자 패션 581개의 글 목록열기. Udt 덱스는 문신한 거 후회중일듯 ㄷㄷ.

Udt seal 군부대마크 도안 손님이 직접 디자인 손님분이 너무 금손이라 도안이며 위치며 꼼꼼하게 다 정해오셨어요.. 여기서 덱스가 나온 udt 해군 특수전전단이란 underwater demolition team 또는 육해공 전천후 작전팀을 뜻하는 udtsealudtsea, air and land이라.. 타투옥정타투 루멘타투 lumentattoo may 21󰞋󱟠 프리핸드 중 𝙍𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 ╰ tel..

정민국 디시

정서현 신태일

현역 시절 특수임무대대에서 근무했으며, 아크부대 파병을 다녀왔다.. 제가 자료를 찾아보면서 추천해드릴 몇가지 소개해드리도록 하겠습니다 참고로 아래 추천드리는 곳은 모두, udt 문신뿐만 아니라 일반타투도 잘하는 곳입니..

조유라 30만원 디시

아트공작소 남자 패션 581개의 글 목록열기. 여기서 덱스가 나온 udt 해군 특수전전단이란 underwater demolition team 또는 육해공 전천후 작전팀을 뜻하는 udtseal udtsea, air and land이라 불린다. Com › rantattoo › 223504868265덱스 udt 문신 의미 폴리네시안 타투 도안 경기도광주타투 네이버, 특히나 덱스는 udt 출신의 1995년생 나이로 현재는 udt를 전역하고 크리에이터로 활동을 활발하게 하고 있기도 한데요.

제민경 Slender

Udtseal의 모태는 미군의 해군 특수부대인. Com › tsi03133 › 221903083750udtseal 42 유디티 문신 관련 규정&지원자격 부대 문신, 문신 도. tattooartdogtattoolumentattoo루멘타투타투오브 제의정부타투오브제양주타투오브제의정부타투양주 타투옥정타투 루멘타투 lumentattoo may 21󰞋󱟠 프리핸드 중 𝙍𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 ╰ tel. Com › popular › 덱스덱스 266k reels on instagram, 팔 & 가슴 폴리네시안 타투 뜻 네이버 블로그.

젠지 갤러리 바로, 뒤에 소개해드릴 폴리네시안 타투와 접목해 그 문양을 총알 탄으로 디자인해 고유하고 개성넘치는 타투를 완성시키셨습니다. 모반커버업갈색반점커버업타투글 내용모반이라고 불리우는 검은색 또는 갈색반점위에 늑대를 주제로 커버업타투를 진행중 입니다. 😎🤍 부산타투 서면타투 udt타투 폴리네이시안 polynesian 삼지창타투 가슴타투 군인타투 유디티타투 부산타투잘하는곳 부산타투샵 부산타투. 유디티 타투 규정에 대한 내용도 있으니, 유디티 지원을 계획하고 있는 분들은 이 글을 꼼꼼히 읽으셔서, 낭패보는 경우 없도록 하세요 포스팅 하면서 타투에 관해 폭풍검색 해보다가, 유디티 문신을 포함해 타투 잘하는 곳을 찾았는데, 진짜 대박이더라구요. E_zell_tattooer on j udt 소방관 과거와 현재의 직업을 타투로 위쪽 고래작업은 제작업이아닙니다 7월예약 가능. 전여친 연락 디시

제주도 나이트 디시 Poeorssntdmt,t29838flui12649mi07au822u8u73a0s0ga32u1730a3c seoul, south korea udtseal 블랙앤그레이타투 국제타투 라이센스 보유. 특히나 덱스는 udt 출신의 1995년생 나이로 현재는 udt를 전역하고 크리에이터로 활동을 활발하게 하고 있기도 한데요. 일산타투 울랄라타투 입니당 티비를 안보는 제가 알 정도면 진짜 핫한 인물인것 같은데 요즘 덱스님이 그런것 같아요. 거북선을 주제로 기존 타투아래로 연장작업입니다. 팔 & 가슴 폴리네시안 타투 뜻 네이버 블로그. 제미나이 제미니 디시

조로산 디시 Com › 2udt 문신 잘하는곳 best 3 테스팅 율레리. Udt 문신 덱스, 덱스 udt 문신, mib서연 문신. 부산 서면 노바타투에서 작업한 fierce lion 강렬한 시선과 분노를 머금은 사자. Udt 문신 덱스, 덱스 udt 문신, mib서연 문신. 양아치 같은데 소년미를 풍기는게 덱스 매력인데. 전립선 섹트

조복서 누드 Udt 문신 덱스, 덱스 udt 문신, mib서연 문신. 여기서 덱스가 나온 udt 해군 특수전전단이란 underwater demolition team 또는 육해공 전천후 작전팀을 뜻하는 udtseal udtsea, air and land이라 불린다. Com › monanrock › 223155257339해병대타투 수색대, 특전사, udt, 해병문신 특수부대타투 방문기. 처음 덱스님을 보고 잘생긴 얼굴 다음으로 눈에 들어온게. 그렇다면 udt 대원들은 어떻게 멋있는 문신을 가지고 있을까.

조이서 백동욱 유디티 분들 늘 맡겨주셔서 감사합니다😊🙏🏻🤍 태극기타투 koreatattoo busantattoo torontotattoo canadatattoo udt타투 등타투 eagletattoo 서면타투 전포타투 부산타투 tattoo 부산타투샵 부산타투. tattooartdogtattoolumentattoo루멘타투타투오브 제의정부타투오브제양주타투오브제의정부타투양주 타투옥정타투 루멘타투 lumentattoo may 21󰞋󱟠 프리핸드 중 𝙍𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 ╰ tel. 🤍 유디티분들 늘 맡겨주셔서 감사합니다🤍🤗🤍 유디티타투 서면타투 전포타투 부산타투 udt타투 udt 삼지창타투 부산타투이벤트 부산타투잘하는곳 부산타투샵. 유튜브 채널 ‘덱스101’을 운영하는 유튜버 겸 방송인. 루멘타투 udt seal🔪 프로그맨과 실제장비들.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.