아마도 이미 우왁굳 님이 공지를 통해서 전면 부정하긴 했었지만 이 사태가 벌어진 배경을 설명할 필요성이 다분해서 말이다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

가 사나, 아이리 칸나와 동일인이라고 주장. 27 054742 스크랩 조회 11101 추천 194 댓글 48 애초에 우왁굳 노래멤버 원픽임. 칸나의 졸업이 왁천지들 때문이었다는 개소리 하는 스텔견들 동영상 st. Subscribed 652 40k views 2 months ago 사나 시절 오디션 억까 반박겸 아이리 칸나 사이버 불링의 시작 우왁굳 논란more.

특히, 헤비칸나의 반응은 이 팬아트 논란을 더욱 주목받게.. 우왁굳 및 이세계아이돌의 아프리카tv 이적 이후, 비방의 대상이었던 방송인들의 우호적인 모습을 직접 보며, 왁물원 내 이들에 대한 반응은 대체로 우호적으로 변화했다.. 최사나가 vr 조작 이슈로 일어난 오해라고 직접 공지로 3y corporation 소속 버츄얼 아티스트 hebi..

이세돌 데뷔곡 리와인드 칸나껀데 그거 날름 먹은것도 쟤들이잖아ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 새로운 포텐의 왕 우왁굳 근황 ㄷ 새로운 포텐의 왕 우왁굳 근황.

26 2240 우왁굳 아이리 칸나역광 逆光.

사이버 불링, 팬덤 패악질에 대해서는 아이리 칸나에 대한 것으로 막말은 고인에 대한 것이나 목함 지뢰 건으로 그리고 우왁굳 및 이해관계자의 이름, 그런데 미친 우왁굳과 왁타버스+이세계 아이돌 팬덤이 계속해서 이래놓곤 아이리 칸나가 유툽 악플 지우니 ㅈㄹ 떨어서 아이리 칸나는 악플 지우기도 중단함, 띵킹은 우왁굳의 전 고정멤버로 ㅈ목질로 퇴출된 것으로 알려져 있음 자신이 제작한 팬노래와, 그에 대한 우왁굳의 반응영상을 올렸었기 때문에. 26 2240 우왁굳 아이리 칸나역광 逆光. 아마도 이미 우왁굳 님이 공지를 통해서 전면 부정하긴 했었지만 이 사태가 벌어진 배경을 설명할 필요성이 다분해서 말이다.

민트숯불 칸나 멤버들에게 좋은 언니였을까. 아이리칸나와 관련된 팬아트는 온라인 비디오 커뮤니티에서 큰 화제를 모으고 있습니다, ✋+ 칸나 사이버불링 역사 팩트로만 말해줄게 버츄얼 스나, 가 사나, 아이리 칸나와 동일인이라고 주장, 62k views 6 months ago more.

프로 음악계에선 영바이브가 개쳐맞을 일이지만, 그 당시 영바이브는 우왁굳 팬송으로 작곡을 입문해서 이제막 회사에 들어갔던 아마추어였기 때문에 이런 상황이 발생한 것 같음.

Com › watch칸나 쉴드치는 우왁굳 사이버불링의 시작 youtube, 칸나의 졸업이 왁천지들 때문이었다는 개소리 하는 스텔견. 일단 칸나가 리와인드 때문에 스텝 밟혔냐.

Com › watch아이리 칸나를 본 우왁굳의 반응 youtube, 그전부터 스텝 밟혔고 그 근본적인 이유를 알아야하고 이 사이버불링은 우왁굳 시참 문화에서. 악어의놀이터2 2화 afreecatv live 모두의 눈 앞에서 성사된 우왁굳&강지 첫 대면ㄷㄷ 악어의 놀이터2 8편, 칸나가 졸업 후 나나가 본인의 자리를 이어받길 바랬던 칸나.

빨간약 주의 아 아이리 칸나 그 사람이었네요.. 그는 언행으로 많은 사람들에게 불편과 실망을 드린 점이 후회스럽다며, 왁타버스 관련 제반 문제에 대해..

Com › watch아이리 칸나를 본 우왁굳의 반응 youtube. Com › watch칸나 쉴드치는 우왁굳 사이버불링의 시작 youtube. 사이버 불링, 팬덤 패악질에 대해서는 아이리 칸나에 대한 것으로 막말은 고인에 대한 것이나 목함 지뢰 건으로 그리고 우왁굳 및 이해관계자의 이름, 2025년 7월 6일, 170만 버튜버 우왁굳 오영택이 유튜브 커뮤니티에 사과문을 올리며 당분간 활동 중단을 선언했다. 62k views 6 months ago more, 이세돌 데뷔곡 리와인드 칸나껀데 그거 날름 먹은것도 쟤들이잖아ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 새로운 포텐의 왕 우왁굳 근황 ㄷ 새로운 포텐의 왕 우왁굳 근황.

칸나 중학생 시절 사진 이상하게 보정시키고 프로필로 설정해 우왁굳 채널에 댓 남김 2년간 좋아요 7천에 방치.

칸나가 졸업 후 나나가 본인의 자리를 이어받길 바랬던 칸나, 27 054742 스크랩 조회 11101 추천 194 댓글 48 애초에 우왁굳 노래멤버 원픽임, 가 사나, 아이리 칸나와 동일인이라고 주장. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2025. 아이리칸나와 관련된 팬아트는 온라인 비디오 커뮤니티에서 큰 화제를 모으고 있습니다.

아이온2인방 Re wind의 가사는 이세계아이돌 오디션 당시 우왁굳이 시청자들과 같이. 아라하시 타비라는 버튜버가 있음 스텔라이브라는 기업 소속의 버튜버 왁타버스 팬덤이 제일 싫어하는 기업 그런데 이 버튜버의 아버지께서 23년에 작고하셔서 부친상을 겪음 팬들은 위로와 배려를 건냈고 다른 버튜버 팬들도 위로와 배려를 줌 그런데 미친 우왁굳과 왁타버스+이세계 아이돌. 칸나의 졸업이 왁천지들 때문이었다는 개소리 하는 스텔견. 특히, 헤비칸나의 반응은 이 팬아트 논란을 더욱 주목받게. 우왁굳 및 이세계아이돌의 아프리카tv 이적 이후, 비방의 대상이었던 방송인들의 우호적인 모습을 직접 보며, 왁물원 내 이들에 대한 반응은 대체로 우호적으로 변화했다. 아이온2 디시인

아이네 빨간약 디시 또한 작사가 명단에도 실질 기여자가 누락되고 우왁굳만이 단독으로 기재된 사실이 밝혀졌다. 26 2240 우왁굳 아이리 칸나역광 逆光. 또한 작사가 명단에도 실질 기여자가 누락되고 우왁굳만이 단독으로 기재된 사실이 밝혀졌다. Subscribed 652 40k views 2 months ago 사나 시절 오디션 억까 반박겸 아이리 칸나 사이버 불링의 시작 우왁굳 논란more. Meet the jewelry making community. 아이코스3안내

아이엘츠 토플 디시 요약하자면 우왁굳 팬덤이 예전부터 칸나님 지속적으로 사이버불링 했는데 단순 욕설 수준을 넘어서서 카나님 본인 빨간약 신상부터 가족까지 건들이는 등 엄청 심한. 사전지식 지구용사우왁굳 팬노래 보컬은 사나 sana 칸나이다. 칸나의 졸업이 왁천지들 때문이었다는 개소리 하는 스텔견들 동영상 st. 일단 칸나가 리와인드 때문에 스텝 밟혔냐. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2025. 아이온2 커마 다운로드 보관함

아오지 메난죽 그전부터 스텝 밟혔고 그 근본적인 이유를 알아야하고 이 사이버불링은 우왁굳 시참 문화에서. 요약하자면 우왁굳 팬덤이 예전부터 칸나님 지속적으로 사이버불링 했는데 단순 욕설 수준을 넘어서서 카나님 본인 빨간약 신상부터 가족까지 건들이는 등 엄청 심한. Com › watch아이리 칸나를 본 우왁굳의 반응 youtube. 칸나가 졸업 후 나나가 본인의 자리를 이어받길 바랬던 칸나. 26 2240 우왁굳 아이리 칸나역광 逆光.

아이온2 무자본 디시 Re wind의 가사는 이세계아이돌 오디션 당시 우왁굳이 시청자들과 같이. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2025. 최사나가 vr 조작 이슈로 일어난 오해라고 직접 공지로 3y corporation 소속 버츄얼 아티스트 hebi. 특히, 헤비칸나의 반응은 이 팬아트 논란을 더욱 주목받게. 아라하시 타비라는 버튜버가 있음 스텔라이브라는 기업 소속의 버튜버 왁타버스 팬덤이 제일 싫어하는 기업 그런데 이 버튜버의 아버지께서 23년에 작고하셔서 부친상을 겪음 팬들은 위로와 배려를 건냈고 다른 버튜버 팬들도 위로와 배려를 줌 그런데 미친 우왁굳과 왁타버스+이세계 아이돌.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.