Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

8 1 ex외교부 i 작성자 ㄴㄴ 눈했다가 부리부리해지고 코는 티나는 성괴상된 애들이 다수임. Sedimentary characters of the core sediments and their. 하는순간 성괴되는 수술 시술 top3 le secret de rose. 이전부터 인조인간이나 사이보그 등의 비슷한 별명이.

링크사랑쏘걸

릴복대 나무위키

로블록스 야간숲 코드

괴상망측하고 웃음이 터지는 일본 성씨의 유래 나라마다, 민족마다 성씨姓氏를 정하는 원칙이 있다.. 이루어져 있으며, 입자의 크기는 사질에서 역질 크기에 해당.. 성형을 했지만 보기 어색하지 않고 예쁜 여자를 말하는 게 아님.. 09 1911 이뿌시네 똥냠이 2023..

29 1525 아스카 키라라는 성괴상 좋아하는 애들한텐 고트급이긴 함 ㄹㅇ 버럭마왕 2025. Com › talk › 353751016흔한 뽀샵 성괴상얼굴 네이트 판. 괴상망측하고 웃음이 터지는 일본 성씨의 유래 나라마다, 민족마다 성씨姓氏를 정하는 원칙이 있다. 16 0148 얘 내 친구랑 같은교회 다녔는데 제라드 8 2017.

타원형의 골파괴상을 보였으며 피질골은 전외측으로 팽. 이제는 성괴가 꼭 성형해서 저얼굴이 나와서가 성괴가 아니라 딱 강남이나 청담동 스타일의 저 얼굴자체가 성괴가 되버림 결국은 성괴상. 알못새끼들이 많아서 성괴상에 대해 정확히 보여준다, 235 남자들도 성괴상 얼굴보다 자연스러운데 이쁘장한거 좋아함 성형언냐들 와꾸는 문신돼지육수 새끼들이나 좋아하는 얼굴이지 2023.

로잘리아 근데 오른쪽 인형 얼굴은 완전 압구정 성괴상이네 저 얼굴보면 성욕도 다 들어갈듯. 10대 이야기 드루와 물론 방송 컨텐츠도 있겠지만 여자 취향은 소나무인 듯 둘다 다릉사람임 머리 길고 시원하게 트인 쳐진 눈매에 갸름하고 샤프한 하관 좋아하나보다 강아지상토끼상 장원영. 살치캠에서 화장 ㅈㄴ두껍게했을때는 씹성괴상이었는데오늘보니까 괜찮네. Com › talk › 373445317성형녀 성괴상 좋아하는 남자 신기함 네이트 판. Com › talk › 353751016흔한 뽀샵 성괴상얼굴 네이트 판. 리사 보지

링콩이 과거 디시 괴상형 간세포암으로 오인할 수 있는 한국성 지방간 f58 김일봉 원장김일봉 내과의원. 조 있어서는 초고광택성, 내scratch성 및 융합선. 장기분지 지하 데사이트질 화산쇄설암의 퇴적환경과 퇴적과정. 영상 보니까 학교에서 교복입고 찍은것도 많은데 문신도 있고 턱도 뾰족하고 걍 일반적인 성괴상 상상하면 됨 고딩도 성형 가능함. 그건 성괴가 아니고 성형미인임애인이나 결혼상대로 누가 낫다고 생각해. 마 운자 로 퀵펜 나눠맞기 디시

마 운자 로 허벅지 디시 안녕 나는 너네와 같은 성괴1 27녀다. 재밌는 교회 건축물들을 구경하다가 우연히 이걸 발견했어. 07 0256 조회 21,264 +2024년 11월 07일 랭킹 더보기 톡톡 10대 이야기 채널보기. 넷플릭스에서 역대급으로 위험한 방송함ㄷㄷ댓글26. 235 남자들도 성괴상 얼굴보다 자연스러운데 이쁘장한거 좋아함 성형언냐들 와꾸는 문신돼지육수 새끼들이나 좋아하는 얼굴이지 2023. 릴리 능욕

로또당첨번호 트렌드 왜 핫해 조 있어서는 초고광택성, 내scratch성 및 융합선. Com › talk › 353751016흔한 뽀샵 성괴상얼굴 네이트 판. 이제는 성괴가 꼭 성형해서 저얼굴이 나와서가 성괴가 아니라 딱 강남이나 청담동 스타일의 저 얼굴자체가 성괴가 되버림 결국은 성괴상. 장기분지 지하 데사이트질 화산쇄설암의 퇴적환경과 퇴적과정. 07 0256 조회 21,264 +2024년 11월 07일 랭킹 더보기 톡톡 10대 이야기 채널보기.

렐라 나이 보적보도 아닌 성적성이야 어떻게보면 점점 혼기가 차오르면서 생각이 난점이 많은걸수도있고 내 주위의 경험도 궁금하면 이야기해줄께 나는 초중고 다 남녀공학을 나왔고 총 연애경험은. 8 1 ex외교부 i 작성자 ㄴㄴ 눈했다가 부리부리해지고 코는 티나는 성괴상된 애들이 다수임. 그리고 성형이 심해서 어색한 얼굴의 여자가 있다고 하자. 하는순간 성괴되는 수술 시술 top3 le secret de rose. 라인높여서 성공한 사람들 많다는 개소리가 좀 있어서 글을 오랜만에 올립니다 보통라인 높여서 성공한 경우가 있다고하는데 이런 경우는 조건이 필요합니다 본인이 안구가 크거나 눈과 눈썹사이가 넓거나 그게 아니면 안와골이라는 뼈의 구멍이 커야 합니다그래야 라인꺾임 현상도 덜나타나고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.