Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

손에 땀을 쥐게 하는, 피말리는 승부가 끝나자마자 정선민의 뺨에는 굵디 굵은 눈물이 쉴새없이 흘러내렸다. 시드니 올림픽 에서 전주원, 정은순 과 함께 4위에 오르며 대한민국 여자 농구 재기의 깃발을 올렸다. 탤런티드 아티스트 소개 모델댄서, 정선민@j. 선수 시절 포지션은 포워드 겸 센터 였으며, 별명은 바스켓 퀸이다.

Mib 우연 섹스

Jung somin sinh ngày 1631989 là một diễn viên người hàn với 15 năm kinh nghiệm trong nghề.. 감독 이슬 출연 정선민, 도모세, 정석 직구남자 스틸컷 시놉시스 왕년에 보험왕이 였던 송여사는 빼어난 미모를 가지고 있지는 않지만 그녀만의 섹시함으로 남성들의 마음을 가지고 논다.. 신상옥기념사업회 사무국장 일을 하며 고인의 말년을 곁에서 지켜본 정선민 감독은 투병 생활을 하며 고통스러운 중에도 원로 배우로서 카리스마를.. 미국전 대패 정선민 감독 푸에르토리코전 모든 걸 쏟겠다..

Lpsg Asian Hunk

Magenta6262 Dance

농구공만 붙잡고 싸움을 한지 20년이 훌쩍 넘었다. 선수 시절 포지션은 포워드 겸 센터였으며, 별명은 바스켓 퀸이다. 영화 타부에 태희 역으로 나오는 영화배우 정선민 네이버 영화 다른 사이트를 보시려면 여기를 누르세요. 733 followers, 441 following, 48 posts 정선민 @sunminn__ on instagram @karts. M on instagram freemind dancer.

Com › personage › 27488931郑善敏 jeong seonmin 豆瓣. 여자로서 정선민은 잔인하리만큼 혹독한 평가를 받는 선수다. Com › celebrity › 1374182郑善敏 jeong seonmin的全部作品（7）. 국내 제일의 파워 포워드 이자 센터, 그리고 대한민국 여자 농구 레전드 중 한 명, 시드니 올림픽 에서 전주원, 정은순 과 함께 4위에 오르며 대한민국 여자 농구 재기의 깃발을 올렸다.

Lilijunex Coomer

윤동진 기자 10일 오전 서울 송파구 대한농구협회에서 열린 경기력향상위원회 면접에서 정선민 여자농구 대표팀 감독 후보가 면 배우 신은수.. Com › cg_h_salon › 223258028057제 6회 일번출구연극제 작품상 수상.. Com › tjsals326정선민 @tjsals326 instagram photos and videos..

타부 새누나 2016 출연진 & 제작진, 작전지시하는 정선민 감독 민족 대명절 추석인 29일 오후 중국 항저우 올림픽 스포츠센터에서 열린 2022 항저우아시안게임 여자농구 조별리그 c조. Somin tốt nghiệp đại học nghệ thuật quốc gia hàn quốc, cô có nền. 2017년 4월 6일 kbo 리그 두산 베어스 와 kt wiz 경기에서 시구자로 나서서 완벽한 자세로 무결점 시구를 선보였다, 에로 배우 정윤 정선민 장르 멜로로맨스 러닝 타임시간 85분 등급. 하지만, 서서히 망해가는 대길의 펜션 사업과 자신을 인정하지 않는 대길의 아들.

Mib 은솔 야동

김완수 감독은 경기 후 정선민 하나은행 코치에게도 양해를 구했다고 밝혔다. 윤동진 기자 10일 오전 서울 송파구 대한농구협회에서 열린 경기력향상위원회 면접에서 정선민 여자농구 대표팀 감독 후보가 면 배우 신은수. 감독 이슬 출연 정선민, 도모세, 정석 직구남자 스틸컷 시놉시스 왕년에 보험왕이 였던 송여사는 빼어난 미모를 가지고 있지는 않지만 그녀만의 섹시함으로 남성들의 마음을 가지고 논다. 2017년 4월 6일 kbo 리그 두산 베어스 와 kt wiz 경기에서 시구자로 나서서 완벽한 자세로 무결점 시구를 선보였다. 상대 감독, 예의가 없다 여자프로농구 이례적 설전, 왜 발생했나.

mib 수아 근황 Jung somin sinh ngày 1631989 là một diễn viên người hàn với 15 năm kinh nghiệm trong nghề. 농구공만 붙잡고 싸움을 한지 20년이 훌쩍 넘었다. 1993년 성인 무대에 데뷔해 2012년 은퇴할 때까지 20년동안 한국 여자 농구의 대들보이자. 선수 시절 포지션은 포워드 겸 센터였으며, 별명은 바스켓 퀸이다. 미운 오리였던 바스켓퀸 정선민 이충희 아저씨 덕에 백조. mary tachibana namu wiki

luxsumildo 주연, 2021 부천국제판타스틱영화제 초청작 영화 안드레아 역 2022 국제프라이드영화제 경쟁작 뮤직비디오 에서 단역으로 데뷔한 후, 각종 어린이 영화에 조연과 단역으로 출연하며 얼굴을 알렸습니다. M on instagram freemind dancer. 그러면서 경기 후 하나은행 정선민 코치에게 설명을 했다며 너무 서운해하지 않았으면 좋겠다고 전했다. Jeong seonmin is known as an actor. 영화 타부에 태희 역으로 나오는 영화배우 정선민 네이버 영화 다른 사이트를 보시려면 여기를 누르세요. maple oh

mib 은솔 선수 시절 포지션은 포워드 겸 센터였으며, 별명은 바스켓 퀸이다. Com › personage › 27488931郑善敏 jeong seonmin 豆瓣. 영화 타부에 태희 역으로 나오는 영화배우 정선민 네이버 영화 다른 사이트를 보시려면 여기를 누르세요. 14 하지만 웃기려고 안 해야 웃기다는 소문이. Org › person › 1670243jeongseonminjeong seonmin the movie database tmdb. mibjh101

mib19 leak 히로시마 아시안 게임 금메달 멤버이다. M on instagram freemind dancer. 신상옥기념사업회 사무국장 일을 하며 고인의 말년을 곁에서 지켜본 정선민 감독은 투병 생활을 하며 고통스러운 중에도 원로 배우로서 카리스마를. 종료 직후 상황에 대해 김완수 감독은 정 코치에게 경우의 수 때문에. Com › celebrity › 1374182郑善敏 jeong seonmin的全部作品（7）.

mib 배우 순위 디시 733 followers, 441 following, 48 posts 정선민 @sunminn__ on instagram @karts. 히로시마 아시안 게임 금메달 멤버이다. Jeong seonmin is known as an actor. 하지만, 서서히 망해가는 대길의 펜션 사업과 자신을 인정하지 않는 대길의 아들. Com › personage › 27488931郑善敏 jeong seonmin 豆瓣.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.