Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

새벽 몇시쯤부터 공연 시작했는지 아시는 분 있나요. 🦈 @traybbbbb🧸 @polodared 🎥 directed by @goatkeke선공개 trayb polodared realtalk. Com › traybbbbbtray b 트레이비 @traybbbbb instagram photos and videos. 19 114558 조회 10220 추천 149 댓글 35 플리키뱅과는 다르게 어차피 어떻게 꾸미든 잘생겨질 수 있는 부분이 1도 없는 얼굴이라 차라리 빡세게 보이게 꾸미는 게 포스라도 느껴져서 괜찮은 듯.

로마숫자 0

하이 안녕하세요 그룹 트라이비가 여섯 개의 다이아몬드가 됐다, Ready to tray 2023 tray show 2024 way 2 trazy 2023 ya dig. Tray b profile and facts tray b 트레이비 is a south korean rapper who debuted on febru under yellin records. 과거 얼굴, 고향, 학력, mbti 등 궁금한. 1 day ago seoul_mukbang00s profile picture seoul_mukbang00.

Official music video for fleeky bang my name is feat. 디스곡을 내도 사람들이 안 듣고 모두의 웃음. 트레이 비 옛날의 좋은 노래를 지금에 맞게 재구성하는 아이디어가 재밌었다. Com › hyeonji_13 › 223198638461네이버 블로그, 이번 트레이비 플리키뱅 vs 홍대래퍼들 사건 보고 느낀건데.

걸그룹 소녀시대 의 프로듀서였던 슈퍼킹 super_king이 프로듀싱을 맡았으며, 투자금은 11억 달러에 달한다.. 디시디아에 빠져 여러개 구입해서 키우고 있는데 다른 종류의 공중 비었거든요.. 새벽 몇시쯤부터 공연 시작했는지 아시는 분 있나요.. 그리고 한동안 음악 안 하다가 그 영상에 나온 홍대래퍼들이랑 친해지면서 다시 음악한거같음 근데 그 홍대래퍼들 무리중 한명 1014코비인지 뭔지 그 듣보가 갑자기 그거 갖고 트레이비랑 플리키뱅 불러내서 사과하라고 한건데..

트레이 비의 앨범 수록곡 중 ‘candy shop remix’는 제목 그대로 2000년대 메가 히트곡인 50센트의 ‘candy shop’ 비트를 빌려왔고, ‘맙소사 omg’는 비슷한 시기 팀발랜드의 곡을 차용했다. Listen to music from tray b on youtube music a dedicated music app with official songs, music videos, remixes, covers, and more, Tray b profile and facts tray b 트레이비 is a south korean rapper who debuted on febru under yellin records. 홍대갈만한곳 놀거리 데이트코스 가볼만한곳 3 안녕하세요. Tray b 트레이비, born lee jaehyung 이재형 is a south korean rapper who debuted under yellin records in 2023. 사클에 올렸었음 pussy atlet이라고 내용은 대충 아틀렛이 자기 통수쳤다고 욕하는 내용이였던거로 기억하고 그때 아틀렛이 잘못 한게 맞는데 플리 read more.

루렝이 티켓

걸그룹 소녀시대 의 프로듀서였던 슈퍼킹 super_king이 프로듀싱을 맡았으며, 투자금은 11억 달러에 달한다. Com › hyeonji_13 › 223198638461네이버 블로그, 이번 트레이비 플리키뱅 vs 홍대래퍼들 사건 보고 느낀건데.

저희가 4명이었기 때문에 단체석이 널널하게 앉을 수. 홍익대 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, Com › watchtray b real talk with polodared official music video, With polodared 2024 rappublic 2024 contestant.

🦈 @traybbbbb🧸 @polodared 🎥 directed by @goatkeke선공개 trayb polodared realtalk, Redirecting to sgall. 트레이비랑 친구들 다구리 쳐도 되니까 싸우자고 ㅈㄹ했대 그런데 트레이비랑 플리키뱅은 지들 이미지 ㅈ되고 요즘 좀 주목받는대 이딴거로 뉴스나오고 그게 싫었는지 걍 질거같다 하고 참은듯 dc official app 78 2.

이번 트레이비 플리키뱅 vs 홍대래퍼들 사건 보고 느낀건데.. Com › @traybbbbbtray b 트레이비 youtube.. 4k 벚꽃 봄 연남동 강남 홍대 연트럴파크 봄나들이 피크닉.. 트레이비 2002년 1월 28일 는 대한민국의 래퍼다..

사클에 올렸었음 pussy atlet이라고 내용은 대충 아틀렛이 자기 통수쳤다고 욕하는 내용이였던거로 기억하고 그때 아틀렛이 잘못 한게 맞는데 플리 read more. 이케아레스토랑 가성비메뉴 점심식사추천 이케아광명점 통등심돈가스 8900원 미트볼 김치볶음밥 4900원 크림파스타 6900원 조각 케익 2900원. 2023년 ep 앨범 way 2 trazy로 데뷔했다.

롤마노

Com › @traybbbbbtray b 트레이비 youtube. T팩토리, 오프라인, 뤂캣미 순서 입니다, 홍대 홍대미용실 퍼스널컬러 퍼스널컬러추천 supernova aespa 랩퍼블릭 킬뎀올 히든매치 1r 트레이비 펀치넬로 펀치넬로 신스 맥대디, 리리론스 고으니네 홍대타투스티커 지워지는 문신 판박이.

리틀설아 사클에 올렸었음 pussy atlet이라고 내용은 대충 아틀렛이 자기 통수쳤다고 욕하는 내용이였던거로 기억하고 그때 아틀렛이 잘못 한게 맞는데 플리 read more. 대학 카테고리로 분류된 홍익대 갤러리입니다. 과거 얼굴, 고향, 학력, mbti 등 궁금한. Com › traybprofileandfactstray b profile and facts updated. 처음 가본 이케아고양점 스웨디시 레스토랑 트레이 카트 끌고 샐러드→메인→디저트까지 골라 담는 재미가 진짜 쏠쏠했어요. 리틀레니 dcinside

렐라 나이 Com › hyeonji_13 › 223198638461네이버 블로그. 무비알콜음료 전통주 커피원두차 커피믹스 원두생두 캡슐더치티백 녹차 쟁반베드트레이 이유유아식기 제기제수용품 컵텀블러와인용품. 스크랩 광고 홍대 아트포엠 미술학원 여러분의 도전에 끝까지 동행하는 아트포엠에서 미대입시 합격의 꿈을 키워가세요. 오랜만에 춤 열심히 췄어 다들 이런거 더 좋아하지. 플리키뱅 얼굴, 트레이비 홍대 디시, 플리키뱅 라이브 공연, 플리키뱅 음악 추천, 홍대 플리키뱅. 로만과 샤론

로 블록 스 800 로벅 스 코드 걸그룹 소녀시대 의 프로듀서였던 슈퍼킹 super_king이 프로듀싱을 맡았으며, 투자금은 11억 달러에 달한다. 영어로 부족을 뜻하는 tribe에서 따와 만들었다고 한다. Com › traybbbbbtray b 트레이비 @traybbbbb instagram photos and videos. With polodared 2024 rappublic 2024 contestant. Com › watchtray b real talk with polodared official music video. 롤체 공허 디시

룽이 T팩토리, 오프라인, 뤂캣미 순서 입니다. 그리고 한동안 음악 안 하다가 그 영상에 나온 홍대래퍼들이랑 친해지면서 다시 음악한거같음 근데 그 홍대래퍼들 무리중 한명 1014코비인지 뭔지 그 듣보가 갑자기 그거 갖고 트레이비랑 플리키뱅 불러내서 사과하라고 한건데. 스크랩 광고 홍대 아트포엠 미술학원 여러분의 도전에 끝까지 동행하는 아트포엠에서 미대입시 합격의 꿈을 키워가세요. 20k followers, 248 following, 10 posts tray b 트레이비 @traybbbbb on instagram 딴딴따라딴. 대학 카테고리로 분류된 홍익대 갤러리입니다.

류라이 더쿠 2023년 ep 앨범 way 2 trazy로 데뷔했다. 새벽 몇시쯤부터 공연 시작했는지 아시는 분 있나요. 비대면 메신져 거래로 진행하고 있습니다. 그래서 오늘은 쇼미12 출연진 래퍼 트레이비 tray b는 누구. 디시와 함께 나오는 스프, 스페셜 트레이, 디저트 등이에요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.