Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

천안미래세종일보 정지용 기자musa & wngp 전국피트니스 대회가 6월 1112일 2일동안 천안 동남구 아우내 실내채육관에서 개최한다. 보디빌딩 3년차 보갤평균이하 ㅁㅌㅊ musa 준비중. 클로즈 베타 테스트cbt 1차 2013년 10월 17 read more. 그냥 상좀 적당히 뿌리고 이상한 종목좀 덜만들었으면.

운동의모든것musa & wngp & bob & anbc.. 지금은 인덕원 지역과 성남 지역 프리랜서로 근무 중이지만 대회를 마치고서 서울이나 분당 지역 가까운 경기지역으로 이직 준비를..

1998_11_04 Leak

Wngp musa 올해도 최선을 다해 준비하겠습니다.. Com › canonma › 223462662631만수동헬스장포텐휘트니스 한재원 팀장 musa대회 후기 클래식피지.. 천안미래세종일보 정지용 기자musa & wngp 전국피트니스 대회가 6월 1112일 2일동안 천안 동남구 아우내 실내채육관에서 개최한다..

168ym

1회 장윤정 검색하고 3000포인트 받기

천안미래세종일보 정지용 기자musa & wngp 전국피트니스 대회가 6월 1112일 2일동안 천안 동남구 아우내 실내채육관에서 개최한다. 천안미래세종일보 정지용 기자musa & wngp 전국피트니스 대회가 6월 1112일 2일동안 천안 동남구 아우내 실내채육관에서 개최한다. 매년 80개의 지역대회가 열리는 대회입니다.

2022 musa 경기 피지크 age 고등부 시니어운동의 모든것 unmo. 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리 musa 이거 대회도. 보디빌딩 3년차 보갤평균이하 ㅁㅌㅊ musa 준비중. 사람마다 다이어트 하는방법은 조금씩 다를수 있는데요, 상을 워낙 좆같이 많이 뿌려재껴서 딱새 인플레이션 주범인 대회.

Com › board › bodybuildingredirecting to sgall, 무사 조직위원회는 는 오는 30일 경기도 의정부시에 있는 신한대학교에서 ‘2025 무사 musa 의정부’ 대회를 연다고 밝혔다, 평균적으로 대회준비는 36개월정도 준비를하는데요 저희 선생님은 3개월 정도 준비를 하셨습니다. 몸수준 ㄹㅇ 처참한데 어떻게 보디빌딩대회에서 상받노, 근데 한국은 개나소나니 믿을게 못되지. Com › board › bodybuildingredirecting to sgall.

Likes, 0 comments musa_wngp_gimpo on aug ⭐️ musa&wngp 부헤드져지 한재혁입니다 지난 주말 파이널대회 출전해주신 모든선수분들 고생많으셨습니다, 안녕하세요 지금은 피트니스 트레이너로 근무하고 있는 찬후 입니다. 지금은 인덕원 지역과 성남 지역 프리랜서로 근무 중이지만 대회를 마치고서 서울이나 분당 지역 가까운 경기지역으로 이직 준비를, 내추럴대회도아니고 냉정하게 그냥 초보들이 나가는대회임 걍예전 피스생각하면될듯, 0 txt 200512202110 헬스 갤. Musawngp, icn korea, wnbf korea.

29옥순 블라 잘은 모르지만 어떤 등급이 있는거 같은데 순서대로 정리 부탁드립니다 ㅠ 그리고 뭐 나바 챔피언. Musa대회 결과를 알려드리려고합니다. 예쁜 교복과 스타일 추천, 학교 생활에 꼭 필요한 정보가 여기 있습니다. 상을 워낙 좆같이 많이 뿌려재껴서 딱새 인플레이션 주범인 대회. 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리 musa 로이더 대회 아님. 2763672 fc2

2400페소 추가적으로 ifbb 도 대회의 한 종류인지 문의드립니다. 몸수준 ㄹㅇ 처참한데 어떻게 보디빌딩대회에서 상받노. Musa대회 결과를 알려드리려고합니다. 그냥 상좀 적당히 뿌리고 이상한 종목좀 덜만들었으면. Com › giant_fit › 2240262208402025 musa 오산 대회 그랑프리 수상. #섹스타그램🔞

1847589히토미 매년 80개의 지역대회가 열리는 대회입니다. Com › mgallery › board보디빌딩 국내대회 수준 서열 정리해준다 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리. 시즌 첫 대회는 4월 6일4월 7일 wngp고양 musa고양 대회로 시작합니다. 둘중하나는 입상하면 도핑비로 몇십만원 내야지 받을수있다고도 들었는데 맞나. 미스터 ymca, 미스터 서울 말 필요없음 여기까지가 정식 도핑검사. 4580412

30대 남자 결혼 포기 디시 보디빌딩 국내대회 수준 서열 정리해준다. 우선 대회에 출전을 하려면 다이어트는 기본입니다. Com › board › bodybuildingredirecting to sgall. 대회 @musa_wngp_bob_korea 촬영 @musa_wngp_modernfilm wngp musa bob 모던필름 대회사진 대회영상 무사코리아 운동의모든것 bob챔피언쉽. 클로즈 베타 테스트cbt 1차 2013년 10월 17 read more.

20대 암 디시 대회 @musa_wngp_bob_korea 촬영 @musa_wngp_modernfilm wngp musa bob 모던필름 대회사진 대회영상 무사코리아 운동의모든것 bob챔피언쉽. 매 시즌마다 살인적인 다이어트를 통한 엄청난 컨디셔닝으로 김주성, 이도영, 홍의승과 함께 스포츠모델 top4로 불리며 종목 내에서 큰 인기를 받고 read more. 오늘은 2025년 오산에서 열린 musa 보디빌딩 대회에서 그랑프리를 수상한 이야기를 공유해보려 해요. Com › board › bodybuildingredirecting to sgall. Keywords 포켓몬 고 배틀리그 승리 전략, 레거시 포켓몬 선택 가이드, 브리두라스 ex 가격, 이상해꽃 하드플랜트 활용법, 리자몽 블러스트번 팁, read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.