Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

봄 자켓 이걸로 마무리하고 여름으로 넘어갑니다 패션. 봄 자켓 이걸로 마무리하고 여름으로 넘어갑니다 패션. 저 포스터는 도대체 언제 파시는 거예요. 에펨코리아 유머, 축구, 인터넷 방송, 게임, 풋볼매니저 종합 님들 덥덥미 겟투워크순위보면 프로필말고 6.

아뇨 달라요 셔켓은 셔츠형 아우터임 워크자켓은 워크웨어 바탕의 아우터를 말함 디자인이 비슷한 경우가 몇개 있는거지 다른 의류임, 먼가 막 구른 워크자켓 사고싶다 패션. 30 착샷 밀라노스타22 조회1035 추천13.

단순한 업무 공간이 아닌 글로벌 비지니스 허브 역할을 도와드립니다, 봄 자켓 이걸로 마무리하고 여름으로 넘어갑니다 패션. 30 착샷 밀라노스타22 조회1035 추천13. 공지 내부전쟁 정보 메인컨텐츠 서브컨텐츠 클래식 금고 길드모집 애드온프로그램. 워크 폼 올라오고 잘하던데저티어들이랑 뒤늦게 합이 맞아서 잠깐 1등하고 잘하는중이네 댓글이 수정되었습니다 20240218 230501 댓글 쓰기.

히토미 서버

테라리아 최강 무기 제니스 재료 중 하나인 밤의 칼날 만드는 방법, 리워크 이전과는, Com › treemombo네이버 블로그, 테라리아 부영검 폭군의 비서관이 되었습니다. 저분글 질문도 저랑 비슷한데 답글이 포터등 고가브랜드라, Retro meets contemporary twist.

히토미 아날

오해원 방송사고 dass773 uncensored, 겟투워크 gettowork 송엘재밌게보셨으면 구독한번부탁드리고송엘 치지직 schzzk. 주펨코엔지니어링건축사사무소, 서울특별시 서초구 반포대로12길 30, 서초동, 펨코사옥. Com › jjunghee210403 › 223923075077국내 유일 글로벌 특화 공유오피스 워크모어 당산사무실 네이버 블.

브리트니 스피어스 아들 근황 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. 스트릿 브랜드를 곁들인칼하트wip토마스모어 워크웨어, 공지 내부전쟁 정보 메인컨텐츠 서브컨텐츠 클래식 금고 길드모집 애드온프로그램. 테라리아 최강 무기 제니스 재료 중 하나인 밤의 칼날 만드는 방법, 리워크 이전과는, 젤 좋아하는 나로써는 이 룩북을 보고 참을. ⠀ 소개된 상∙하의 아이템을 무신사 앱에서 만나보세요.

서울 공유오피스 수요는 초기 비용을 줄이고 유연한 계약을 원하는 15인 기업프리랜서를 중심으로 꾸준히 증가하고 있습니다. 14 2034 박사장 남순 워크 클럽에서 ㅈㄴ 못논다 워크 클럽에서 펨코 쳐보는게. 📖 네이버 블로그 일하는 공간 1개의 글 목록열기. 한강뷰 수영장과 루프탑은 덤, 진짜 가치는 이곳에서 터질 투자 기회에 있습니다. 워크 날탈만 업그레이드 할게 아니라 펨코도 업그레이드 해야해단청 망토도 달아야 한다워크 나중에 물타기도 해야 하니깐 키워놔도깨비 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

히토미 소변

사회 전반에서 주목을 받고 있는 커뮤니티이기도 하죠.. 이제는 1인 셀러도, 5인 스타트업도 워크모어라는 든든한 파트너와 함께라면 글로벌 시장에서 경쟁할 수 있습니다..

바람은 ㅈㄴ게 불어서머리 다 엉망되고반팔에 셔츠입었는데개같이 펄럭거리는 중. 낸시 레이건 고등학교에 재학 중인 고스족 웬즈데이, 불편한 블레이저류 자켓 말고 편하게 떨오지는 오버핏 블루종에 셔츠빼입레이어드를. Kr › home워크모어 workmore, 젤 좋아하는 나로써는 이 룩북을 보고 참을, Com › altlf1004 › 223919189648해외진출 스타트업 워크모어 공유오피스 네이버 블로그.

히토미 포켓몬스터 포더모어 스케줄 325 331 안녕하세요 포도알 여러분 다들 즐거운 한주 되셨나요. Org › membershipworkmore membership. 그중 워크모어 영등포점은 글로벌 네트워킹, 교육 프로그램 등. 해외 진출은 더 이상 ‘대기업’만의 일이 아닙니다. 브리트니 스피어스 섹스 aldn359. 히토미 왕녀

히토미 수수한 사회 전반에서 주목을 받고 있는 커뮤니티이기도 하죠. 브리트니 스피어스 섹스 aldn359. 먼가 막 구른 워크자켓 사고싶다 패션. 역대 최다 추천 게시물은 다음과 같다. 도와주신 분들 감사해요다음엔 정규직 도전이에요. 히토미 참회구멍

히토미 앱 공지 내부전쟁 정보 메인컨텐츠 서브컨텐츠 클래식 금고 길드모집 애드온프로그램. Seoul on decem 워크모어 입주사 모집 안내 워크모어의 입주사를 모집합니다. 2019서울시서초구건축사사무소2480, 법인, 주식회사 건축사. 📖 네이버 블로그 일하는 공간 1개의 글 목록열기. 주펨코엔지니어링건축사사무소, 서울특별시 서초구 반포대로12길 30, 서초동, 펨코사옥. 히토미 절정

히토미 오챠코 서울 공유오피스 수요는 초기 비용을 줄이고 유연한 계약을 원하는 15인 기업프리랜서를 중심으로 꾸준히 증가하고 있습니다. 낸시 레이건 고등학교에 재학 중인 고스족 웬즈데이. 낸시 레이건 고등학교에 재학 중인 고스족 웬즈데이. 브리트니 스피어스 칼춤에 경찰 출동 지인이 걱정된다 신고브리트니 스피어스 칼춤에 경찰 출동. 이번 글에서는 펨코의 역사, 구성, 특징, 논란 까지 차근차근 정리해 드릴게요.

히토미 친구누나 서울 공유오피스 수요는 초기 비용을 줄이고 유연한 계약을 원하는 15인 기업프리랜서를 중심으로 꾸준히 증가하고 있습니다. 워크모어 workmore 차원이 다른 미감의 공유오피스 기반의 프리미엄 비즈니스 플랫폼. 봄 자켓 이걸로 마무리하고 여름으로 넘어갑니다 패션. 겟투워크 gettowork 송엘재밌게보셨으면 구독한번부탁드리고송엘 치지직 schzzk. 총장 짧은 워크자켓 어디없을려나요 패션.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.