Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

想哭哈哈@wisshh3 twitter profile. 林间一边小鹿乱撞一边心中爆发尖锐痛苦爆鸣你冷静一点！ ！ 室友他是直男！ ！！ 两人同吃同住同睡，日常被误会成狗男男关系，室友毫不介意，甚至拉林间去相亲宴上当挡箭牌。 林间内心流泪你们直男能不能克制一点，又被哄得团团转，一起搬去了. Com1mjiba 这个链接有人能打开吗，需要什么vpn app 原视频片段我以前. 室友去打球，把留在宿舍的球鞋射上狗精爆射一通（入群99） 电报：st.

도쿄모션 사이트

데브리먼트

肌肉狗被主人控制好久后让他狂干飞机杯兴奋到喷精，一边感受飞机杯带来的快感一边感受着主人抽打带来的兴奋，从表情中就能看出他有多爽，身为秒男却被主人牢牢控制尽情蹂躏， read more.. 控射直男室友⭐️ 直男室友第一次用润滑油打飞机感觉怎么那么强烈好敏感 怎么（鸡巴）遇到同学就那么敏感（平时自己撸也没有这么敏感啊） 大屌又长又粗薄肌身材也很诱人.. Gay pawn直男因同情需要钱而选择同志 1200.. 肌肉狗被主人控制好久后让他狂干飞机杯兴奋到喷精，一边感受飞机杯带来的快感一边感受着主人抽打带来的兴奋，从表情中就能看出他有多爽，身为秒男却被主人牢牢控制尽情蹂躏， read more..

두디트 스웰팝 디시

《直男室友總在自我攻略_歸簷完結》第1頁 《直男室友總在自我攻略》作者：歸簷完結 簡介 岑致前世遇人不淑，唯一談過的男友裴潭瞞著他腳踏兩條船，出軌後還害的他年紀輕輕就去世。 再睜開眼，他發現自己重生在渣男生日那天。. 第一章 直男室友他好会 作者：遨游宝宝 文案 凌嘉树身高一米九，宽肩窄腰八块腹肌，荷尔蒙爆棚，是全校公认的gay圈天菜。 但他是直男，而且恐同。 作为一名同性恋，乔颂深知恐同直男的可怕。 自从两人搬进一个宿舍，他就想尽一切办法躲着凌嘉树。. 直男室友总想和我贴贴是盘欢作者的最新小说，直男室友总想和我贴贴小说网提供直男室友总想和我贴贴最新章节全文免费阅读，直男室友总想和我贴贴下载，直男室友总想和我贴贴全文字更新，直男室友总想和我贴贴无弹窗！.

想哭哈哈@wisshh3 twitter profile, Com › book › 938128715第一章_直男室友他好会（遨游宝宝）_全本书库. 偷 直男洗澡 twitter hashtag, 想哭哈哈@wisshh3 twitter profile.

室友去打球，把留在宿舍的球鞋射上狗精爆射一通（入群99） 电报：st.. 《直男室友總在自我攻略_歸簷完結》第1頁 《直男室友總在自我攻略》作者：歸簷完結 簡介 岑致前世遇人不淑，唯一談過的男友裴潭瞞著他腳踏兩條船，出軌後還害的他年紀輕輕就去世。 再睜開眼，他發現自己重生在渣男生日那天。.. 室友@shiyou60342063 twitter profile..

두목 토끼 남친

디시 윈터 ㅗㅜ ㅑ

Com › book_95069438直男室友他人设崩了 砚山亭_直男室友他人设崩了最新章节免费阅读_我, 勾引抖音16岁直男体育生和室友一起撸射还有个室友帮忙拍视频内容对话超刺激要完整视频➕qq 2151095501 直男采访 直男帅哥飞机 勾引体育生 勾引直男 勾引直男飞机. Gay pawn直男因同情需要钱而选择 大学twink室友无法互相抵抗 734.

뒤에서 대딸 Sotwe gay sexemo छोटा indonesia 同性恋色情影片. 偷 直男洗澡 twitter hashtag. 偏偏徐新朝不承认，还说自己是直男。 高考结束后，时一报考了南海大学，想着和徐新朝分路扬镳，断绝联系。 报道当天，他看到寝室门上新室友的名字徐新朝。 同名同姓。 推开寝室门，时一愣了几秒钟，随后转身。 他一定是走错了，徐新朝怎么也在！. Com › book › 19774被直男室友宠坏了 天下为攻全文阅读最新章节txt下载无广告弹窗. 林间一边小鹿乱撞一边心中爆发尖锐痛苦爆鸣你冷静一点！ ！ 室友他是直男！ ！！ 两人同吃同住同睡，日常被误会成狗男男关系，室友毫不介意，甚至拉林间去相亲宴上当挡箭牌。 林间内心流泪你们直男能不能克制一点，又被哄得团团转，一起搬去了. 데바데갤

도쿄 공유 하우스 男大！趁他室友不在直接去他宿舍，第一吃感受到体育生也可以很温柔呦。 主页置顶 直男直男s 直男主贱狗原味黑袜臭脚体育生原味打桩机黑屌内射公0. 直男室友总想和我贴贴是盘欢作者的最新小说，直男室友总想和我贴贴小说网提供直男室友总想和我贴贴最新章节全文免费阅读，直男室友总想和我贴贴下载，直男室友总想和我贴贴全文字更新，直男室友总想和我贴贴无弹窗！. Com › book_95069438直男室友他人设崩了 砚山亭_直男室友他人设崩了最新章节免费阅读_我. 第一章 直男室友他好会 作者：遨游宝宝 文案 凌嘉树身高一米九，宽肩窄腰八块腹肌，荷尔蒙爆棚，是全校公认的gay圈天菜。 但他是直男，而且恐同。 作为一名同性恋，乔颂深知恐同直男的可怕。 自从两人搬进一个宿舍，他就想尽一切办法躲着凌嘉树。. Pzysl_1688s tweet video. 도태남 야동

돗테누리 我的直男室友 這次有點暈船me 在看片喔？ 臭直男：（ 正需要你臭直男室友的胸 非常飽滿⋯我整個撲上去舔⋯他先摸摸我的頭，後來就開始把我的嘴當飛機杯使用⋯ 最後都灌. 想哭哈哈@wisshh3 twitter profile. 《直男室友總在自我攻略_歸簷完結》第1頁 《直男室友總在自我攻略》作者：歸簷完結 簡介 岑致前世遇人不淑，唯一談過的男友裴潭瞞著他腳踏兩條船，出軌後還害的他年紀輕輕就去世。 再睜開眼，他發現自己重生在渣男生日那天。. 直男原味收割机@zhinanshow twitter profile. Cc › index › 151217直男室友他好会最新章节直男室友他好会章节目录 耽美文学城. 데뷔전 fc2

덕 코프 푸른 갤럭시 아스 Corfvzcuj1im 國 蚱迿居家下海,良家人妻僭谡鎸身上肉肉松垮垮了,很懂男人心. 被一个教室的男高看我射精特别骚的男高还伸舌头最后有射直男飞机 直男崇拜 直男调教 直男开苞 直男粗口 直男原味 暴露. 控射直男室友⭐️ 直男室友第一次用润滑油打飞机感觉怎么那么强烈好敏感 怎么（鸡巴）遇到同学就那么敏感（平时自己撸也没有这么敏感啊） 大屌又长又粗薄肌身材也很诱人. 偏偏徐新朝不承认，还说自己是直男。 高考结束后，时一报考了南海大学，想着和徐新朝分路扬镳，断绝联系。 报道当天，他看到寝室门上新室友的名字徐新朝。 同名同姓。 推开寝室门，时一愣了几秒钟，随后转身。 他一定是走错了，徐新朝怎么也在！. 室友去打球，把留在宿舍的球鞋射上狗精爆射一通（入群99） 电报：st.

덴지 요루 야스 Com › book_95069438直男室友他人设崩了 砚山亭_直男室友他人设崩了最新章节免费阅读_我. 室友去打球，把留在宿舍的球鞋射上狗精爆射一通（入群99） 电报：st. 勾引抖音16岁直男体育生和室友一起撸射还有个室友帮忙拍视频内容对话超刺激要完整视频➕qq 2151095501 直男采访 直男帅哥飞机 勾引体育生 勾引直男 勾引直男飞机. 诱饵巴士直男被 大学twink室友无法互相抵抗 734. 室友@shiyou60342063 twitter profile.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.