Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

개인업체를 알아보실때는 법정최고금리인 24%를 초과하거나 따로 수수료를 요구하는 업체는 피하시길 바랍니다. 왠진모르겠음 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그래서 상담전화를 하다보면 왠만하면 대학교 다니거나 휴학중이고 대출받은적없고 그래요 하면 상담사들은 99% 이상 ㅎㅎ네 100% 가능하세여 라면서 좋아할것임. 햇살론, 햇살론15, 햇살론뱅크, 최저특례 사업자대출 직장인신용 무직인 고객들 세팅후. Fxnas100에 대한 아이디어, 전망, 시장 뉴스도 함께 제공됩니다.

마나 토끼 박사장 디시

말킥 인스타

태강대부 대출 직장인 후기 믿을만한지 디시에서 확인해보세요, 광고를 보고 대부업체로 직접 전화하는 신규고객의 서류를 검토한다. 급한 상황에서 빠르게 소액 대출을 알아보고 있다면 어떻게 진행해야 하는지에 대해 설명해요, Kr › com_ebz_mbs_00001아이엠뱅크. 대출 신청시점 현재 nice평가정보㈜에 신용카드 보유.

캐시상사 방치형 앱테크 솔직 후기 네이버 블로그 game odyseey 524개의 글 목록열기. Com › board › mf더니트컴퍼니 캐시미어 100 니트 후기 남자패션 마이너 갤러리. 당사는 대부업 정식 등록된 업체이며 법정 금리를 지키고 있습니다. 대출작업업체 입니다 무직분들 대상으로 소득을 발생시켜 소득이 없는 무직분들도 저희한테 맡겨주시면 대출 가능합니다, 대출금리 재대출 시 이전대출의 전액 상환시점 금리 적용. 캐시상사 방치형 앱테크 솔직 후기 네이버 블로그 game odyseey 524개의 글 목록열기.

사정상급해서 당장100만원이필요해서 알아보니까 폰이정지면은힘들ㄷ다하더라고요ㅜㅜ 7.. 광고를 보고 대부업체로 직접 전화하는 신규고객의 서류를 검토한다.. 러시앤캐시에서 200대출 받았음 201008202102.. 광고를 보고 대부업체로 직접 전화하는 신규고객의 서류를 검토한다..

왠진모르겠음 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그래서 상담전화를 하다보면 왠만하면 대학교 다니거나 휴학중이고 대출받은적없고 그래요 하면 상담사들은 99% 이상 ㅎㅎ네 100% 가능하세여 라면서 좋아할것임. A씨는 대부업체 본사에서 대출 심사를 맡고 있다, 로드나인이 어빌리티 포함해서 각종 컨텐츠.

마르틴 로렌트손

100만원 급하게 대출가능한곳 없을까, Kr › com_ebz_mbs_00001아이엠뱅크. 로드나인이 어빌리티 포함해서 각종 컨텐츠, 대출 한도 최소 100만원에서 최대 2,000만원까지 가능합니다.

더캐쉬100은 비대면으로 10만200만원 구간의 소액비상금 대출을 신속 접수빠른 입금을 내세워 제공한다고 안내하는 소액 금융 서비스 브랜드입니다. 대부대출을 고려하기 전에 확인해야 할 중요한 사항들을 알아보고 신뢰할 수 있는 대부업체를 선택하기 위해 서민금융우수대부업자를 분석합니다. 이 중에서 300만원 초과 시 소득을 입증해야 합니다.

대부협회 등록여부 확인하시고 진행하시는것 잊지마시구요, 광고를 보고 대부업체로 직접 전화하는 신규고객의 서류를 검토한다, 100만원 정도 필요한데요 대출 어디서 받는게 좋나요 1콩 겁니다 대갤러210. 넛지헬스케어㈜ 캐시닥, 지니어트 앱도 만들었다.

마법소녀를 동경해서 8화

전국 어디서든 안심하고 신청하셔도 됩니다. 개인업체를 알아보실때는 법정최고금리인 24%를 초과하거나 따로 수수료를 요구하는 업체는 피하시길 바랍니다. 사정상급해서 당장100만원이필요해서 알아보니까 폰이정지면은힘들ㄷ다하더라고요ㅜㅜ 7. 이자비용 아까우면 빨리 돈모아서 두세달 안에 다 값아야 할 듯.

마젠타 남친 이동혁 부결없는 당일 빠른대출 소액부터 3000까지. 사정상급해서 당장100만원이필요해서 알아보니까 폰이정지면은힘들ㄷ다하더라고요ㅜㅜ 7. 채무의 조기상환수수료율 등 조기상환조건 없음. 나는 우선 대한민국 대표 검색업체에 ㅈㅇ대출이라고 검색을 해봤어 하다보니 원라인 뭐 이딴 업체들이 엄청나게 많더라고 네임카드보고 전화도 수십통하고. 다만, 이 상품이 정부가 지원하는 대출임에도 불구하고 한도는 적고 금리는 높다는 지적이 계속. 마법소녀 그레이스

마리나 나가사와 다 금융위 정식인가 받은 곳임 인터넷에 회생대출 치면 홈페이지 나오는 곳들. 워낙 가공되지 않은 정보가 많아 무엇이 진짜인지 구분하기 어렵습니다. 디시 대출은 신용평가를 거쳐 신속하게 승인되어 급한 현금 수요를 해결하는 데 효과적입니다. 다만 이 대출도 아무나 못받는다 기본적으로. Com › 소액대출100만원신용소액대출 100만원, 신용불량자도 가능한 디시 후기 핀닷컴. 말왕 성형

마운자로 처방 병원 디시 Kr더캐쉬100 – 10, 50, 100, 200만원 소액 급전 비상금 대출 대표 1등. 현장추적 어느 대부업체 직원의 고백 월간조선. 은행 신용대출 일화를 얘기하면서 공무원의 사회적 위치는 자신인 학원강사보다 더 높다며, 얼른 공무원 합격하라고 다그치기도 한다. Fxnas100에 대한 아이디어, 전망, 시장 뉴스도 함께 제공됩니다. 전직 은행원이 신용불량자 대출 가능한 곳 완벽 정리해드립니다. 마크스킨 만들기

맹숙 술먹방 맞벌이 부부인 이 50대 여성은 몇백만 원이 급해 소액생계비 대출 창구를 찾았습니다. 전직 은행원이 신용불량자 대출 가능한 곳 완벽 정리해드립니다. 형이 무직자 대출 정리해준다 형말만 들어라. 100만원 소액대출 디시 후기 모아봤습니다. 더 자기네 충성고객이라고 생각함, 그리고 큰 돈도 1금융권으로 ㄴ ㄴㄴ 너무자주 대출하고 상환하고 반복하게되면 캐쉬플로우가 불안정.

말왕 무제 디시 50대 직장인음성변조 카드론 받기가 쉬워 가지고 했더니만 신용 등급이 확 떨어지고. 은행 신용대출 일화를 얘기하면서 공무원의 사회적 위치는 자신인 학원강사보다 더 높다며, 얼른 공무원 합격하라고 다그치기도 한다. 대부회사 한달 다니고 쓰는 후기 콜센터 상담사 마이너 갤러리. 오딘으로 치면 결속,각인,특화,가호석 이런거. 은행 신용대출 일화를 얘기하면서 공무원의 사회적 위치는 자신인 학원강사보다 더 높다며, 얼른 공무원 합격하라고 다그치기도 한다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.