Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Ly48it31n 사에코 와 함께 달리기 좋은 오나홀 입니다. 2020년 상반기 여배우별 비디오 매출 3위. 긴 세월끝에 2025년 화려하게 복귀하심. 직장 마지막 날 갑자기 사키의 입술을 빼앗은 카마타.

나노바나나 검열 뚫기 디시

키는 167cm 몸무게는 46kg이다.. 마츠시타 사에코 농염한 페이스 요망한 눈빛 더블s급 몸매 왁싱되어있는 그곳 농익은 분위기 최악의 단점은 어태커즈에서 커리어 대부분을 낭비해서 모든 작품이 비슷비슷하고 본거 또본것 같음 다양한 장르를 아우를수있는 포텐셜이있는데 재능만 낭비 함..

나가타 사쿠라 Avdbs

한 번도 섹스를 해본 적 없는, 큰 성기를 가진 깔끔한 젊은 아내들의 옆에는 남편이 있다. 74gb 20240410 다운로드 335588, Ly48it31n 사에코 와 함께 달리기 좋은 오나홀 입니다, Net › 351275310마츠시타 사에코 은퇴한다더니 또 복귀했네 dogdrip.

나는푸르 낙태

나이스링크 13

Net › 351275310마츠시타 사에코 은퇴한다더니 또 복귀했네 dogdrip.. 유튜브 채널보니 영상 다 삭제했더라구요.. 18gb 20240507 다운로드 226655.. 그렇지만 2016년 4월에 복귀했고, 5월에 작품을 내고 6월에도 출품 예정인 작품이 나와있는 상태이며 현재 8월 작품까지 소개되어 있는 상황이다..

25년 복귀하신 av배우 유머움짤이슈. 마츠시타 사에코 대망의 av4번째 작품은 철저히 그녀를 조교 하다, 이카세다 엄청 이카세 작품, 그녀가 승무원 일을 그만두는 계기가 된 기장과 불륜을 다룬 1박 2일의 불륜 온천 여행을 주관 영상으로 전달합니다, 241124일 마츠시타 사에코松下紗栄子, saeko matsushita는 일본의 av 성인 비디오 배우로, 1990년 9월 30일 일본 홋카이도에서 태어났습니다.

Cc › content › 579774117adn219 다음 아내 배덕의 오후 마츠시타 사에코 오카 영화. Com › dalbaksa › 223322682909마츠시타사에코 컴백하나. 한 번도 섹스를 해본 적 없는, 큰 성기를 가진 깔끔한 젊은 아내들의 옆에는 남편이 있다, 마츠시타 사에코의 최신작 & 프로필 matsushita saeko. 노도의 논스톱 중출 10연발 & 농후, Sspd157 무검열 유출 jav 무료 온라인 시청, saeko matsushita, 동창회에서 만난 제자였는데, 그녀는 이제 유부녀가 되어 있었고, 전보다 훨씬 섹시해져서 아침까지 섹스를 했습니다.

나띠 디시 레전드 74gb 20240410 다운로드 335588. 마츠시타 사에코 av 온라인 보기 missav. 개선요청 딥시크한테 마츠시타 사에코 근황 및 품번을 물어봤습니다. 18gb 20240507 다운로드 226655. 2015년 휴지기를 갖고 2016년 복귀 후 어택커즈로 이적. 나나사키 미이로

나기사 미츠키 작품 Av 배우 리뷰하는 유튜브 채널을 운영하면서 협찬을 받았던건데, 소프트하고 질퍽한 느낌이 굉장한 녀석이었습니다. 2021년 2월, 소속사 티파워즈의 공식 페이지에서 이름이 사라지며 사실상 은퇴. 마츠시타 사에코 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 2020년 8월, 월간 fanza 발표 20202년 상반기 여배우 랭킹 8위. 이 사주의 장점은 리더십이 풍부해 지도자적 기질로 여러 사람들을 잘 포용하며 인정이 많고 친철하다는. 나스갤

김채연 몸무게 총평 이 사주의 태생은 대인관계가 좋아 무슨 일이든지 협력하여 여러사람이 함께하는 일을 하면 성공할 운입니다. Net › 351275310마츠시타 사에코 은퇴한다더니 또 복귀했네 dogdrip. 마츠시타 사에코 11월에 복귀하네 자동차 갤러리. 18gb 20240507 다운로드 226655. 쓰리 사이즈는 b91w61h91로써 브라사이즈는 h컵이다. 나이시 가슴

나는유나 porn 마츠시타 사에코 농염한 페이스 요망한 눈빛 더블s급 몸매 왁싱되어있는 그곳 농익은 분위기 최악의 단점은 어태커즈에서 커리어 대부분을 낭비해서 모든 작품이 비슷비슷하고 본거 또본것 같음 다양한 장르를 아우를수있는 포텐셜이있는데 재능만 낭비 함. 2015년 휴지기를 갖고 2016년 복귀 후 어택커즈로 이적. 마츠시타 사에코 약력 홋카이도 출신이다. 그녀가 승무원 일을 그만두는 계기가 된 기장과 불륜을 다룬 1박 2일의 불륜 온천 여행을 주관 영상으로 전달합니다. 0점, 최근 작품 2026년 2월 발매.

김선영 미드 움짤 일본 av matsushita saeko 컬렉션 보기. 대물훈남들이랑 세계 여행하며 화보찍고 노는중 매니져 포함종종 새벽에 남아이돌 2명이 번갈아 집에 들어간거 파파라치한테 찍히는등, 여러 남자와 엮이는 모습이 보이긴 합니다만, 알빠. 76gb 20240316 다운로드 116655. 마츠시타 사에코 복귀 좀 해줘라 시발 ㅇㅇ 106. 19 2054 근데 마츠시타 사에코누님 복귀점.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.