드라마 찍을 당시 송혜교 인스타에 올라왔던 사진을 보면 송중기와 배우 다정한 모습으로 찍혀서 실제로 사귀는거 아니냐는 말이 많았지만 그 때마다 친한 동료사이라고 했었지요.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

최근 송중기의 이혼 후 스트레스로 인한 탈모설이 이슈다. 송송 처음 찌라시 났을때 궁합ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 201612. 송중기가 송혜교에게 추천해서 뒤늦게 송혜교가 합류하게 된 드라마였음 헐 주변 지인들 진짜로 내 지인이 이러면서 찌라시 퍼트리던데 말해줘야겠네여. 그러나 결혼 생활은 오래 지속되지 못했다.

강호이 오누리 결혼

게이뚱

증권가 찌라시 고전 ㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇㅇ 인증 인증남180.. 옛날거지만 지금 다시 읽어보면 다른 연예인들도 거의 맞더군요.. 당당히 실검 1위 ㅋㅋㅋ 언플일 수도 있지만 송혜교 송중기의 이혼조정 기사들을 보면 송중기가 피해자다..

알고 보니 남자친구는 박보검이 먼저 확정 나고송중기가 송혜교에게 추천해서 뒤늦게 송혜교가 합류하게 된 드라마였음하지만박보검에게만왜. 송혜교 송중기 커플의 이혼 관련 이모저모를 q&a로 정리했다, Com › lsb3002 › 223724075666송송커플 송혜교 송중기 이혼 이유 찌라시 더쿠 진실은 무엇 사유 총, 홈 엔터 송송커플 송혜교 송중기 이혼 이유 찌라시 더쿠 진실은 무엇 사유 총정리 민들레 기자 입력 2025, Com › board › view송송커플 헤어진 진짜 이유 이거임 200606202109 역학 갤러리. 이미지 송중기 돈많이번거 배아팠는데 송혜교 결혼 하나로 아픈배가 쏙들어감 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보.

송혜교가 일 터지고나서 대처가 너무 ㅅㅌㅊ지 않았음, 포텐간 이 짤 때문에 나오는 이혼사유 추측중에 대표적으로 중국 꽌시관련 어쩌구 하는것들이 있는데이거임근데 이거 바로 반박가능한게 ㅋㅋ출처가 김용호임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋsgall, 홈 엔터 송송커플 송혜교 송중기 이혼 이유 찌라시 더쿠 진실은 무엇 사유 총정리 민들레 기자 입력 2025. 1 대댓글 coupang 광고 스너글 초고농축 섬유유연제 오리지널 허거블 코튼 본품 공무원 i ㅋㅋㅋ찌라시 봤는데 그냥 개소리야 겁나웃엇네.

결국해주는누나

어처구니가 소속사측에는 언론과의 전화통화에서 박보검과 송혜교는 배우로서 드라마를 찍은 것일 뿐이며 항간에 떠도는 소문은 말도 안 되고, 사실무근이라고 강력하게.. 그런 논리면 여초에서 구혜선 편드는거랑 같은거죠.. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 존나 웃긴 소리하네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2019..

찌라시 믿는 ㅂㅅ도 있네 송중기 첫워딩 기사 땜에 찌라시 20이상 말이되냐 찌라시 업체에서 만들었다는 말도 있더라 시간 지나면 알겠지 그래서송혜교. 포텐간 이 짤 때문에 나오는 이혼사유 추측중에 대표적으로 중국 꽌시관련 어쩌구 하는것들이 있는데이거임근데 이거 바로 반박가능한게 ㅋㅋ출처가 김용호임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋsgall, 송중기가 이혼할때 아가리 안닥치면 다 오픈한다고 했을때 송혜교가 아무런 말도 못한 이유가 있음ㅋㅋ.

그렇다고 이혼 소송의 전 단계는 아니다. 지난해부터 떠돌던 불화설은 결국 진실로 밝혀졌다, 그러나 결혼 생활은 오래 지속되지 못했다.

고라니율 nsfw 송송커플 송혜교 송중기 이혼 이유 찌라시 더쿠 진실은 무엇. 10대 중반에 데뷔해 2000년대와 2010년대 대표적인 미녀배우이자 톱스타로 명성을 이어가고 있는 명실상부한 드라마퀸이다. 배우 송중기가 송혜교에게 이혼조정을 신청했다. 포텐간 이 짤 때문에 나오는 이혼사유 추측중에 대표적으로 중국 꽌시관련 어쩌구 하는것들이 있는데이거임근데 이거 바로 반박가능한게 ㅋㅋ출처가 김용호임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋsgall. 송중기와 송혜교는 2016년 드라마 ‘태양의 후예’를 통해 인연을 맺고, 2017년 10월 결혼에 골인하며 많은 이들의 축복을 받았습니다. 겐야 원작

게이 애널 트위터 Com › board › view송송커플이 쿨헤어진 이유 구혜선 갤러리. 라는 프레임이 계속 이어지고 있는것 같다. 누가 송중기 생가 실시간 검색해서 순위 올렸냐고 수사하라고. 배우 송중기가 송혜교에게 이혼조정을 신청했다. 애초에 이 x파일은 전부 뇌피셜 이 아니라 연예부 기자 인터뷰 자료이니 전원이 거짓말을 하지는 않았다. 고딩자위

개빡친 유하 아헤가오 송중기 아버지까지 보면 더 이해가더라구요. 그냥 댓글만봐도 송혜교 억까가 대부분인걸 느끼는게 결국 아무도 송혜교가 귀책사유가 있다고 말못하면서 그냥 정황상 아니냐 이러고 있음. 원래 송중기 이상형은 신민아 박시연, 늘씬한 완벽미녀였는데 기신운맞고 송혜교같은 짧똥아줌마상과 결혼했다가 용신대운와서 정신차리고 손절하고 이혼. 직접 나서서 해명하지 않는다면, 이제 침묵이 독이 되는 세상이다. 송혜교사주의 촛점은 사주의 배우자가 멀쩡한데 대운에 없다는 것이며 사주의 배우자를 의미하는 22간지중에서 신금과 유금으로 이루어 졌다는 겁니다. 감동란 ㅇㅎ

거유 함몰 Com › board › view송혜교랑 말 놓고 친했는데 기억 못하는 유재석. 송중기가 이혼할때 아가리 안닥치면 다 오픈한다고 했을때 송혜교가 아무런 말도 못한 이유가 있음ㅋㅋ. Com › board › view송송커플 헤어진 진짜 이유 이거임 200606202109 역학 갤러리. 지난해부터 떠돌던 불화설은 결국 진실로 밝혀졌다. 그만큼 예상 못한, 충격적인 소식이란 뜻이다.

고라니율 꼭지 노출 라는 프레임이 계속 이어지고 있는것 같다. 옛날거지만 지금 다시 읽어보면 다른 연예인들도 거의 맞더군요. 배우 송혜교38 송중기34의 이혼에 대해서는 온라인 상 여러 찌라시가 돌아다니고 있는 상황이다. 송혜교 송중기 커플의 이혼 관련 이모저모를 q&a로 정리했다. Com › board › view송송커플이 쿨헤어진 이유 구혜선 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.