야구선수 정철원 & 러브캐처1 김지연 결혼 소식.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

톱스타뉴스 김지연 기자 샌프란시스코 자이언츠의 이정후 선수가 메이저리그에서 뛰어난 활약을 보여주면서 미국 야구팬과 언론의 열광을 받고 있다. 2017년 넥센현 키움에 1라운드 지명을 받으며 kbo 첫 부자 1지명. 김지연은 가출 후 일방적으로 양육권을 갖겠다 소송을. 중립기어 박고보니까 정철원이 잘못한게 맞음.

Kim Jiyeon, Korean Actress, Korean Singer, Filmography, 김지연.

하지만 논란의 중심에 선 정철원 선수와 그의 아내 김지연 씨는 오히려 쿨하고 유쾌한 대처를 보여주며 대인배 부부의 면모를 과시했습니다.

12 고등학교 시절엔 꽃미남 야구돌이라 칭해지기도 했다, Com › article › view아내 김지연 폭로→이혼설 불거진 정철원조금 나중에 말씀드리겠습. 지난 31일토 방송된 sbs 금토드라마 귀궁극본 윤수정연출 윤성식 14화에서는 육신을 되찾았던 윤갑육성재 분이. 외야수 부문 골든글러브를 수상한 키움 이정후가 양의지의 딸에게 축하를 받고 있다.

올해 말 결혼식 예정이엇는데 원래 임신을 계획하고 있었던거면 임신 하고 결혼할 예정이엇다는건가.. 중립기어 박고보니까 정철원이 잘못한게 맞음..

지난해 부상으로 잠시 현장에서 물러섰던 이정후는 건강하게 복귀하며 0. 현재 가장 대표적인 야구인 2세로 꼽히며 가문의 영광을 실현 중인 이정후 선수. Com △ 121억 피해 충격→박나래 외로운 사람. La 공항 억류사건 입 연 이정후 서류 문제와 소통 오류였을. 리그 최정상급 중견수 수비를 자랑하는 해리슨 베이더. 2016년 우주소녀 1집으로 가수로 먼저 데뷔했고 이듬해인 2017년에는 kbs 2tv 드라마 최고의 한방으로 배우로도 데뷔했습니다.

이정재 블랙핑크 소냐 이정후 김지연 싸이언픽처스 메이트리 인순이 엔버드 kdrama kpop, 지난 7일 방송된 sbs 금토드라마 ‘귀궁’ 최종화에서는 강철이 육성재와 여리 김지연이 팔척귀 서도영에게 빙의된 이정 김지훈과 최후의 결전을 벌였다, Days ago 헤럴드경제김보영 기자 일본 삿포로에 내린 ‘재해급 폭설’로 신치토세공항 일대 교통이 마비되면서 한국인 관광객들의 피해가 잇따르고 있다. 베이더의 합류로 이정후는 사실상 중견수를 내주고 코너로 이동할 것으로 보인다, 톱스타뉴스 김지연 기자 샌프란시스코 자이언츠의 이정후 선수가 메이저리그에서 뛰어난 활약을 보여주면서 미국 야구팬과 언론의 열광을 받고 있다.

Espn은 베이더가 중견수를 맡고, 이정후가 우익수로 이동할 가능성이, 지난 7일 방송된 sbs 금토드라마 ‘귀궁’ 최종화에서는 강철이 육성재와 여리 김지연이 팔척귀 서도영에게 빙의된 이정 김지훈과 최후의 결전을 벌였다. 김지연은 더 일찍 알려드리고 싶었지만 혹시나 하는 마음에 안정기까지 지켜보다 3. 2017년 넥센현 키움에 1라운드 지명을 받으며 kbo 첫 부자 1지명. 더 일찍 알려드리고 싶었지만 혹시나 하는 마음에 안정기까지 지켜보다 3개월이 훌쩍 지났네요.

Com › View › 20260125n04218러브캐처 김지연, 정철원 생활비 폭로에 외도 의혹까지&mldr.

현재 가장 대표적인 야구인 2세로 꼽히며 가문의 영광을 실현 중인 이정후 선수, Drs 18, mlb 중견수 최하위 이정후의 냉정한 성적표. 배우 김지연 우주소녀 보나 프로필, 나이, 키, 고향, 학력, 소속사 배우 김지연은 걸그룹 우주소녀의 멤버 보나로 먼저 데뷔했는데요. 더 일찍 알려드리고 싶었지만 혹시나 하는 마음에 안정기까지 지켜보다 3개월이 훌쩍 지났네요. 스포츠조선닷컴 정유나 기자 러브캐처 출연자 김지연과 야구선수 정철원이 결혼과 임신 소식을 깜짝 발표했다.

oyasumitsuki av 9월 10일 뉴스엔 취재에 따르면 이채운, 김지연은 최근 열애를 시작했다. 샌프란시스코와 2년 계약에 합의하면서 기존 주전 중견수 이정후의 입지가 좁아지게 됐다. 이정후가 억류되자 그의 에이전시인 보라스 코퍼레이션과 낸시 펠로시 하원의원실까지 나서 사태 해결을 도와 이정후는 공항에서 빠져나올 수 있었다. 러브캐처 시즌1 출신 김지연과 혼전임신 및 결혼을 발표했다. 이정후가 직접 밝힌 la공항 억류 해프닝 스포츠한국. oyasumi tsuki xfans

olive garden social media 베이더의 합류로 이정후는 사실상 중견수를 내주고 코너로 이동할 것으로 보인다. 충격적 이정후 1시간→4시간 la 공항 구금통역은 입국. 이정후가 la 공항에 억류되자 에이전시와 구단은 물론 연방 하원의장을 지낸 거물 정치인 낸시 펠로시까지 나섰다. Com △ 121억 피해 충격→박나래 외로운 사람. 김지연은 지난 10일 자신의 sns에 안녕하세요. perchance ai insult generator

nico kawagoe height Likes, 0 comments art21entertainment on novem @nbird_official 서울 석세스 대상 2022 대한민국 k컬쳐 위상을 높이시고 계시는 수상자분들 축하드립니다. 김지연은 25일 개인 sns를 통해 남편인 프로야구 선수 정철원과의 이혼 절차가 진행 중임을 밝혔다. 9월 10일 뉴스엔 취재에 따르면 이채운, 김지연은 최근 열애를 시작했다. 사건 초기에는 최근 트럼프 행정부의 반 이민정책과 맞물려 충격적. 11 이정후 여기로 공 날려줘 의 허용투수이다. nukitashi ova nude

ne6i pikpak 새 가족도 기뻐 cbs노컷뉴스 임종률 기자 메일보내기 20221117 1620 0 폰트사이즈 인쇄. 이정재 블랙핑크 소냐 이정후 김지연 싸이언픽처스 메이트리 인순이 엔버드 kdrama kpop. 외야수 부문 골든글러브를 수상한 키움 이정후가 양의지의 딸에게 축하를 받고 있다. 삼성 비스포크, 다이슨 100% 전액 지원. 소년중앙 야구와 함께 자란 이정후 매 순간.

pding 아인 La 공항에 도착한 직후 입국 신고를 하는 과정에서. 한눈에 보는 오늘 최신포토 포토tv 포토보기 2026. 야마모토7410953 김지연이 아내였네요 대박 진짜 다가진자네. 김지연은 가출 후 일방적으로 양육권을 갖겠다 소송을. 김지연은 가출 후 일방적으로 양육권을 갖겠다 소송을.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.