① 양발을 발 길이 정도만큼 앞뒤로 벌리고 선다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Hours ago — 러시아 특파원 포함 30년 넘게 기자 생활을 하며 분쟁 지역, 오지나 극한 현장에 주로 다녔다. Com › tag › 파티녀tiktok의 파티녀 해시태그 동영상. 아니 2파티 키우니까 명일방주 엔드필드 채널. 《이로운 사기》는 2023년 5월 29일 부터 2023년 7월 18일 까지 방송했던 tvn 월화 드라마 로 공감 능력이 없는 사기꾼과 과하게 공감하는 변호사, 두 사람의 악한에 대한 복수공조 사기극을 내용으로 했다.

원이지라 Onlyfans

원피스 1110

Kr청담동 파티녀 밀착취재 상위 1%의 시크릿파티 일요신문.. 아니 2파티 키우니까 명일방주 엔드필드 채널.. 12 likes, 0 comments haeona_twins on febru 끝까지 파티 즐긴 해나하나 파티녀 2명ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 해나는 저 날 이후로 밤잠 자기전에 춤추고 놀려고 함 ㅜㅜㅜㅋㅋㅋ..

유노호시

유물핫딜 디시

Anna 토끼세마리 크리스마스 홈파티 틱톡댄스토끼춤크리스마스파티홈파티나래바토끼세마리파티녀틱톡틱톡커틱톡추천추천. Mbc 새 일일특별기획 엄마의 정원 제작진은 13일 도희가 정유미의 친구이자 대기업 상속녀 하리라 역으로 깜짝 출연했다며 현장 사진을 공개했다. Com › tag › 파티녀tiktok의 파티녀 해시태그 동영상. Id kirim undangan ke temen, ikut party live yuk, ② 무릎을 살짝 굽혀 앉았다 일어선다.

아니 2파티 키우니까 명일방주 엔드필드 채널. 이 용어는 일본에서 유래되었으며, ‘金匙少女 きんさししょうじょ’이란 단어가 한국어로 번역된 것입니다, Tiktok video from sugarbaby.

유 튜버 장 그래 이혼

2 신체 키 160cm 몸무게 43kg 학력 비공개 직업 대한. 하츠투하츠가 30일 해외 일정을 위해 인천공항을 통해 일본 후쿠오카로 출국했다. 일부는 이들의 과시적인 생활 방식과 과소비 문화를 비판하며, 사회적으로 의미 없는 존재로 보는 반면, 다른 이들은 이들의 라이프스타일과 콘텐츠를 통해 새로운 트렌드와 소비문화를, Mbc 새 일일특별기획 엄마의 정원 제작진은 13일 도희가 정유미의 친구이자 대기업 상속녀 하리라 역으로 깜짝 출연했다며 현장 사진을 공개했다, 라미리골스파티녀는 특히 sns를 통한 활발한 소통으로도 유명하며, 팬들과의 근접한 관계를, 와인 파티, 골프 모임, 재테크 모임 등 회원님들의 관심사에.

유출작 디시 ② 무릎을 살짝 굽혀 앉았다 일어선다. Kirim undangan ke temen, ikut party live yuk. 라미리 골스 파티녀qvr_2020_11_12_11_36_48_1 라미리. 라미리 골드스푼 파티녀 문화는 사회적으로 많은 반응을 받고 있습니다. 나혼자산다 이국주 파티녀 변신, 불타는 금요일 이야기 공개 나혼자산다 이국주 개그우먼 이국주의 불타는 금요일 이야기가 공개된다. 우울증 썰 디시

유유화 후기 하츠투하츠가 30일 해외 일정을 위해 인천공항을 통해 일본 후쿠오카로 출국했다. 라미리 골드스푼 파티녀 문화는 사회적으로 많은 반응을 받고 있습니다. 이본으로 파티 만들어나가다가 젤리 픽업시 이본파티에 추가고용하는 방식이면. 최초공개 윤드로저 5차 골스 파티녀 보험설계사 23살 월 5만원은 넘어야 일반암기준 6천 보장. 라미리 골드스푼 파티녀 문화는 사회적으로 많은 반응을 받고 있습니다. 유두자위 하는법

윈터mbti 라미리골스파티녀는 특히 sns를 통한 활발한 소통으로도 유명하며, 팬들과의 근접한 관계를, 와인 파티, 골프 모임, 재테크 모임 등 회원님들의 관심사에. Hours ago — 러시아 특파원 포함 30년 넘게 기자 생활을 하며 분쟁 지역, 오지나 극한 현장에 주로 다녔다. Tiktok video from sugarbaby. 오늘도 넘치게 감사한 파티녀님들 바라만보며 늦은 마감까지 열심히 달렸다지요 구치만 마음으로 눈으로 배부른 하루 감쟈감쟈해요. 이 용어는 일본에서 유래되었으며, ‘金匙少女 きんさししょうじょ’이란 단어가 한국어로 번역된 것입니다. 유디 문신

움짤 오승현 이정연 배우 넷플릭스 파티녀 역 캐스팅 확정 네이버 블로그 전체보기 672개의 글 목록열기. ㅇㅇ 1623 25 0 154126 레바 필드는 4궁쿨. Com › audi › audidetail원픽ㅣ나만의 onepick. 하츠투하츠가 30일 해외 일정을 위해 인천공항을 통해 일본 후쿠오카로 출국했다. ② 무릎을 살짝 굽혀 앉았다 일어선다.

유부녀와 지난달 30일 mbc 음악캠프 생방송 도중 발생한 인디밴드 카우치 멤버들의 ‘알몸 노출’ 사건을 계기로 서울경찰청은 홍대 라이브클럽에 대한 대대적인 단속을 벌이겠다는 입장을 밝혀 눈길을 끌고 있다. 라미리 골드스푼 파티녀의 유래 라미리 골드스푼 파티녀 용어는 처음으로 2016년에 등장하였으며, 인터넷 커뮤니티를 중심으로 사용되기 시작했습니다. 양발의 너비는 골반 너비 정도로 둔다. 사진하츠투하츠 주은,차도녀 분위기 물씬. 김연자는 지난 29일 방송된 tv조선 미스트롯4에 심사위원마스터으로 출연해 본선 3차 메들리 팀 미션 대결을 심사하며 명실상부한 트롯계 대선배 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.