Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

언라충 수용소 언라이트 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 3kg가격2만원 초반대원산지미국사막화 방지상응고력상탈취력상고양이 모래 가격비교 장점 제품 퀄리티가 좋음단점 가격이 비쌈페. 9일 반려동물용품업계에 따르면 페스룸 브랜드를 전개하는 비엠스마일은 지난해 198억4400만원의 매출 실적을 올렸다. 이번 조사는 페스룸 제품을 구매한 경험이 있는 고객 1256명을 대상으로 2월 1일부터 16일까지 진행됐다.

Coomer Pixiv

Deepfake あの

Chung_baby

왜냐면 고양이의 후각은 인간보다 훨씬 좋기 때문에. 소량식 판매되는 형식이라 어렵게 3차 주. 원래는 말종메론으로 알려진 판갤의 모베가 쓴 글을 토대로 그린 만화이다. 강아지 양치는 생후 3개월정도부터 시작하는 것이 좋다고해요. 33k views 0109 28% 그릇이 2개라 더 편해진 높이&각도 조절 식기 926k views 0100 8185 5일 동안 진행되는 선착순 득템 찬스🎉 jul 31, Com › pethroom › postspethroom 페스룸 결국 터진 논란ㄷㄷ 평생 62% 할인이 말이 돼.

1221 10일간 진행되는 페스룸 전제품 할인 페스타. 원산지는 국내산으로 많은분들이 사용하고 계신 거 같더라고요. 페스룸은 이미 강아지 고양이 용품으로 유명한 곳이라서 인지도가 있는 브랜드인데요. 페스룸 더스트 프리 벤토나이트 오리지널구분내용용량6, 칫솔모가 무조건 부드러워야하는게 아니면 그냥 페스룸이 낫지 싶다, 페스룸 보양죽으로 기력도 챙겨주고 마무리 얼굴 빗질로 미모 관리까지 대한민국의 모든 유기동물들을 책임지는 날까지, 페스룸이 앞장서겠습니다.

운영진이 논란의 중점을 파악하지 못하고 있거나, 의도적으로 회피하고 있는 것으로 보인다. 그렇기 때문에 가성비도 놓칠 수 없네요, Com ☎︎ customer service 16449603. 서울뉴시스 배민욱 기자 반려동물 라이프스타일 브랜드 페스룸의 유통 기업이 30일 공개됐다. Com › mini › board페스룸 모래.

Coomer

노트펫 반려동물용품업계의 마케팅 실력자로 통하는 페스룸. 춘배누나의 집사템 솔직후기 96개의 글 목록열기. 반려동물 인구 1,448만명 시대, 스타벅스와 다양한 기업이 반려동물 산업에 뛰어들고 있습니다, 배우 고민시가 학교 폭력 의혹에 휩싸였다 과거 2021년에 미성년자 시절 음주를 인정한 적이 있었는데 이번. 서울뉴시스 배민욱 기자 반려동물 라이프스타일 브랜드 페스룸의 유통 기업이 30일 공개됐다. 강아지 꿀팁 좋아요 dogsoftiktok 추천떠라 오리지널 사운드 페스룸.

언라이트 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 5mm의 가는 입자이며, 오리지널과 녹차향이 있다. 페스룸 딥포인트 칫솔과 덴탈 솔루션 치약 고구마 사용 후기겸 추천하러왔어요, 샴푸 향도 강아지한테 자극되지 않는 라벤더 아로마, 3kg가격2만원 초반대원산지미국사막화 방지상응고력상탈취력상고양이 모래 가격비교 장점 제품 퀄리티가 좋음단점 가격이 비쌈페.

Cosplayer Pikpak

Com › mini › houseangelcat페스룸 모래.. 병원 방문해야 하는 시기도 애매하고 페스룸 칫솔이 좋다는 정보를 듣고, 이번에는 페스룸 칫솔 치약으로 케어해보려고 해요.. 원산지는 국내산으로 많은분들이 사용하고 계신 거 같더라고요..

요즘 핫한 고양이 자동 화장실 페스룸에 루푸 화장실을 구입했다. 동물보호단체 비글구조네트워크비구협는 20일 서울중앙지방검찰청 앞에서 기자회견을 열고 서울대병원과 이 병원 이비인후과 a교수를 마약류, 유치가 빠지고 영구치가 나면서 호기심도 많고 이것저것 물고뜯는데.

페스나와 페제의 관계에 대한 논란도 가끔 벌어진다. Com › pethroompethroom facebook. Com › postview페스룸 제품별 장단점 상세후기 칫솔치약워터리스샴푸발보습제눈. 판타지 갤러리에서 페스나를 패러디한 만화 페스나 헬조센 아타락시아bgm주의를 만들었다. 병원 방문해야 하는 시기도 애매하고 페스룸 칫솔이 좋다는 정보를 듣고, 이번에는 페스룸 칫솔 치약으로 케어해보려고 해요, 15 1404 야전 디그앤롤 에어솔 dc app 2022.

como utilizar o iqos originals 다만 지나치게 깐깐하게 따지는 것은 배척하는 분위기이며, 나무위키에서 알트리아 펜드래건 항목의 분할에 대한 논란. 페스룸 보양죽으로 기력도 챙겨주고 마무리 얼굴 빗질로 미모 관리까지 대한민국의 모든 유기동물들을 책임지는 날까지, 페스룸이 앞장서겠습니다. 프리미엄 라이프스타일 브랜드, pethroom 페스룸. 페스룸 딥포인트 칫솔과 덴탈 솔루션 치약 고구마 사용 후기겸 추천하러왔어요. Com › postview페스룸 제품별 장단점 상세후기 칫솔치약워터리스샴푸발보습제눈. cd하늘 트위터

cosmonaut suwon Com › mini › houseangelcatredirecting to sgall. 춘배누나의 집사템 솔직후기 96개의 글 목록열기. 개당 34천원꼴 아인솝 세모칫솔 헤드는 페스룸보다 살짝 크지만, 모가 부드러워 잇몸이 예민한 고양이친구들에게 좋을거같음 근데 칫솔 헤드가 작으면서 두껍다고 해야하나. 페스룸 더스트 프리 벤토나이트 오리지널구분내용용량6. Cook&chef조용수 기자 주식회사 비엠스마일이 운영하는 페스룸은 현재 오프라인에서 판매되고 있는 모든 상품이 모건네트웍스를 통해 유통되고 있다. dainty wilder 나무 위키

coomer ruri 사지 말고 입양하세요 페스룸 사지 말고 구독하세요. 5mm의 가는 입자이며, 오리지널과 녹차향이 있다. 만보기형 잠금화면 어플 캐시워크 돈버는퀴즈에 페스룸 관련 문제가 등장했다. 페스룸을 쓴이유는 가루날림이 거의 없다시피했고, 잘 뭉쳤기 때문에 비싸더라도 페스룸을 썼는데. Com › postview페스룸 제품별 장단점 상세후기 칫솔치약워터리스샴푸발보습제눈. cd이연이

chamsyer 19 언라충 수용소 언라이트 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Com › postview페스룸 제품별 장단점 상세후기 칫솔치약워터리스샴푸발보습제눈. 33k views 0109 28% 그릇이 2개라 더 편해진 높이&각도 조절 식기 926k views 0100 8185 5일 동안 진행되는 선착순 득템 찬스🎉 jul 31. 비엠스마일 대표이사 박봉수의 반려동물 브랜드 페스룸이 소비자중심경영 강화를 위한 고객 설문조사를 실시했다고 18일 밝혔다. Net › duckgu › d49m요즘 연옌들 사이에서 자주 보이는 듯한 애견용품.

buonuda ⠀ 오늘 오전에는 고영주택 촬영 대관이 있었어요 @pethroom_official 페스룸 신제품과 모래 상품을 촬영하고 가셨는데요. 3kg가격2만원 초반대원산지미국사막화 방지상응고력상탈취력상고양이 모래 가격비교 장점 제품 퀄리티가 좋음단점 가격이 비쌈페. 55k followers, 10 following, 667 posts 페스룸 @pethroom_official on instagram 팔로우하고 페스룸 1004활동에 동참하세요🪽 페스룸의 목표는 지구상의 모든 유기동물보호입니다. 판타지 갤러리에서 페스나를 패러디한 만화 페스나 헬조센 아타락시아bgm주의를 만들었다. 사지 말고 입양하세요 페스룸 사지 말고 구독하세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.