Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

0권 당시에는 헤어스타일이 후시구로 메구미 와 닮아서 본편에서는 지금과 같은 모습으로 디자인이 변경되었다. 나나미 켄토 처음으로 싸운 1급 주술사로, 상성상 우위에 있던 마히토도 꽤나 고전한 강적이었다. 고유특성만독불침, 불요불굴의 정신력, 신체능력, 영혼타격 주태구상도 특성노화x, 혈액이 독으로 작용 평타가 흑섬 적혈조. 주술회전스포작품 내에서 토도의 인망jpg.

Xxhamsterxx

X Videos

Yasyadong 주소

인류의 희망 이타도리 유지의 생존 확인과 시무리안 외계 종족과의 긴장감 넘치는 정치 드라마, 그리고 저울 규정의 놀라운 재등장까지. 이 hat을를 다른 아이템과 믹스하고 매치해 나만의 독특한 아바타를 만드세요. Com › community › board주술회전스포모듈로 최근 전개로 퍼뜩 떠오른 후속 전개 예상.

줄거리 편집 평범한 소년 vs 저주의 왕 격돌. Days ago 마히토는 이러한 공통점을 진작에 의식하고서 이타도리를 농락했으며, 이타도리 본인은 계속해서 그것을 부정했지만 결국 자신이 마히토와 닮았다고 인정했다. 모듈로 이타도리 근황 주술회전 팬텀 퍼레이드 마이너 갤러리. Ⓞ 추천 ⓤ 단축url shumoruniv, Day ago 잡담 주술회전모듈로 이타도리 등장씬 애니메이션 4 샤크드레이크 2185490 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 4363일 lv.

이타도리 빼곤 주술회전 수십년뒤인 모듈러까지. Days ago 특기는 떡지우개를 만드는 것이라고 한다. 고죠는 지 강한거에 취한채로 존나 싸돌아.

Days ago 그후 이타도리를 만나 술을 권하며 고죠 사토루는 술은 못했다고 말하는데, 이타도리가 고죠를 모르는 척하자 수상하다고 판단하여 6 이타도리를 공격한다.. 마히토는 걍 영혼까지 공격가능한 이타도리 해한방에 반갈죽 날거고.. 이타도리 지금 스펙적혈조술어주자반전술식영역전개육탄능력 최상위늙은티 안내게 그린 것 같은데 주태구상도 섭취로 약간.. 이타도리한테 쳐맞으면서 다부라 각성할거고 근데 여태 등장인물 다 합쳐도 이타도리 못 죽일거같은데 최종보스가 누구려나..

마히토의 술식에 의해 개조 인간이 되어버린 뒤, 이타도리에게 덤벼든다. 👀 팬들 사이에서 회자되는 주술회전 후속 세계관 ‘모듈로 modulo’ 에서 노년의 이타도리 유지가. 인류의 희망 이타도리 유지의 생존 확인과 시무리안 외계 종족과의 긴장감 넘치는 정치 드라마, 그리고 저울 규정의 놀라운 재등장까지. 이타도리 지금 스펙적혈조술어주자반전술식영역전개육탄능력 최상위늙은티 안내게 그린 것 같은데 주태구상도 섭취로 약간, 마히토는 걍 영혼까지 공격가능한 이타도리 해한방에 반갈죽 날거고, 구체적인 시기는 불명이지만 옷코츠의 반지를 유카가 갖고 있었기에 옷코츠가 살아있던 때로 보인다.

xv videos 아쿠타미 게게가 스토리를, 이와사키 유지가 작화를 맡은 이 작품은 본편 완결 시점으로부터 68년이 흐른 2086년을 배경으로 한다. 모듈로 이타도리 근황 주술회전 팬텀 퍼레이드 마이너 갤러리. 29 143330 ip ip보기클릭 스크랩 url 복사. Days ago 특기는 떡지우개를 만드는 것이라고 한다. 유지 이타도리 머리 미소 jjk 모듈로 및 수천만 개의 아이템으로 아바타를 꾸미세요. xfans お市

xhamster 남자 이타도리가 늙지 않는 이유, 드디어 밝혀졌다. 마히토는 걍 영혼까지 공격가능한 이타도리 해한방에 반갈죽 날거고. Days ago 특기는 떡지우개를 만드는 것이라고 한다. 근데 모듈로에서 이타도리 주술회전 마이너 갤러리. 👀 팬들 사이에서 회자되는 주술회전 후속 세계관 ‘모듈로 modulo’ 에서 노년의 이타도리 유지가. yadongstore porn

xmadter If 모듈로 이타도리 vs 카시모 주술회전 마이너 갤러리. 이타도리가 늙지 않는 이유, 드디어 밝혀졌다. Days ago 특기는 떡지우개를 만드는 것이라고 한다. 주술회전 모듈로 20화드디어 진짜 실력이 공개된 이타도리. 햇병아리 주술사들의 뜨거운 반란이 시작된다. yr-101 mib

yas닷컴 2003년 3월 20일 미야기현 센다이시1. 2003년 3월 20일 미야기현 센다이시1. 주술회전스포작품 내에서 토도의 인망jpg. 7년간의 대장정을 마친 주술회전의 공식 후속작. 고죠는 지 강한거에 취한채로 존나 싸돌아.

xhater 7년간의 대장정을 마친 주술회전의 공식 후속작. Ⓞ 추천 ⓤ 단축url shumoruniv. Com › board › view주술회전 모듈로 이타도리 나오는거 확정인듯 ㅋㅋ 만화 갤러리. 9 이타도리는 스쿠나에게 준페이의 치료를 요청하지만 스쿠나는 이를 거절하며 10 마히토와 함께 이타도리를 비웃고 11 결국 준페이는 무위전변의 부작용으로 사망한다. Com › benicio_ › 224133901199후속작인데 이렇게 재밌다고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.