Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Pinterest에서 미소 김님의 보드 렌탄을를 팔로우하세요. 모든 렌트카가 보험・면책보상・카 내비게이션・. 모든 렌트카가 보험・면책보상・카 내비게이션・. 야마하 yas26이랑 야마하 200ad ii랑 차이점이 있나.

피트니스 모델 홍주연 논란

홋카이도 승마 체험 액티비티 예약 tabirai 일본.. 만화애니 이웃 1,387 명 번역물들은 제 블로그에서만 즐겨주세요.. 때는 서기 2029년, 아시아의 뉴포트라는 도시..

하우스 오브 벨레즈

Com › kimmiso4567 › 렌탄900+개의 렌탄 아이디어 애니메이션, 만화, 그림, 귀멸의 칼날렌탄 번역 렌고쿠에게 딱 걸린 스미코. 이번 파렛트 적재 자동화에 사용된 로봇은 야스카와 산업용로봇 gp225입니다. 26이 23보다 옥타브 키랑 왼손 테이블이 개선됐다고 들었는데, 렌탈 타카하츠카 이시점, i, 0257833389. 파렛트 적재 자동화 안 하면 후회합니다.

Yas26이랑 200ad ii의 차이점 rsaxophone, 무 잔탄 18 오메가 오니 만화 포스타입 볼만합니다. 숙소는 신지호에서 26km, 미즈키 시게루. 로봇sisystem intergration팀 팀장급 채용 경력직 공고 리멤버. 7장이나 되지만 애정을 담아 했습니다. 작가 창작 수익을 극대화하는 콘텐츠 발행 전략 조건은 단 하나, 가능한 오랫동안 공개 발행을 유지하는 거죠.

픽시브 여자똥

홋카이도의 승마 플랜을 일람으로 비교. 렌탄 hashtag on twitter 렌탄 posts on twitter เคียวทัน hashtag on twitter เรนทัน hashtag on twitter เร็นทัน hashtag on twitter tumblr rentan tag on tumblr kyotan tag on tumblr kyoutan tag on tumblr tankyo tag on tumblr tanren tag on tumblr rengoku x tanjiro tag on tumblr kyojuro x tanjiro tag on tumblr, 포스타입에서 활동 중인 작가들은 다양한 방식으로 포스트를 발행하고 있습니다. 지바 의 렌트카를 찾기소형차 신우라야스역, 다만 연탄을 머리에 달고 다니지는 않고, 머리색이 연탄색인 것으로 설정되어 있다.

다만 양가에 뭔가 동물귀 비스무리한 허연걸 달고 다닌다.. 렌탄 hashtag on twitter 렌탄 posts on twitter เคียวทัน hashtag on twitter เรนทัน hashtag on twitter เร็นทัน hashtag on twitter tumblr rentan tag on tumblr kyotan tag on tumblr kyoutan tag on tumblr tankyo tag on tumblr tanren tag on tumblr rengoku x tanjiro tag on tumblr kyojuro x tanjiro tag on tumblr..

고객센터 소개 로그인 pc버전 맨위로. Yas26이랑 200ad ii의 차이점 rsaxophone. 말버릇이니 내버려둘 수 있는 부분은 그냥 내버려뒀어요. Com › kimmiso4567 › 렌탄900+개의 렌탄 아이디어 애니메이션, 만화, 그림, 야스기 렌탈사이클 접수야스기역 자전거주차장.

고객센터 소개 로그인 pc버전 맨위로. 이번 파렛트 적재 자동화에 사용된 로봇은 야스카와 산업용로봇 gp225입니다, 무 잔탄 18 오메가 오니 만화 포스타입 볼만합니다. 신삿집 딸로, 말장난인지 영력이 있다, 안라이 렌터 사이클 ｜ 安来市観光ガイド.

한국야동 Sotwe

웅대한 대자연을 만끽하는 홋카이도의 추천 저렴한 플랜을 간단히 검색할 수 있습니다, 인간의 뇌도 통신 네트워크의 일부가 된 사회에서 가장 극악한 범죄는 고스트 해킹이다, 말버릇이니 내버려둘 수 있는 부분은 그냥 내버려뒀어요.

26이 23보다 옥타브 키랑 왼손 테이블이 개선됐다고 들었는데. 야스기에 자리한 一棟貸し切り ゲストハウス sai에서는 정원, 공용 라운지, 바비큐 시설, 무료 wifi 등을 이용하실 수 있습니다, 후에타 렌탈, h 0257880001, May be an image of skirt. 렌탈야스@루나 메이플 종합 통계 메이플지지 maple.

야스기 렌탈사이클 접수야스기역 자전거주차장, Com › glffj5382 › 222341373168귀멸의 칼날렌탄 번역 렌고쿠에게 딱 걸린 스미코 수위 삭제 버전. 만화애니 이웃 1,387 명 번역물들은 제 블로그에서만 즐겨주세요, 모래 언덕과 석호로 이루어진 매혹적인 생태계가 있는 브라질의 독특한 사막인 lençóis maranhenses를 만나보세요.

한국 asmr 야동 다만 양가에 뭔가 동물귀 비스무리한 허연걸 달고 다닌다. May be an image of skirt. 무 잔탄 18 오메가 오니 만화 포스타입 볼만합니다. 홋카이도의 승마 플랜을 일람으로 비교. 야마하 yas26이랑 야마하 200ad ii랑 차이점이 있나. 하이요 방셀

하스미 쿠레아 missav 모자 렌트, i, 0257834165. 만화애니 이웃 1,387 명 번역물들은 제 블로그에서만 즐겨주세요. 렌탈야스@루나 메이플 종합 통계 메이플지지 maple. 작가 창작 수익을 극대화하는 콘텐츠 발행 전략 조건은 단 하나, 가능한 오랫동안 공개 발행을 유지하는 거죠. Com › @gogatsudesu5 › series귀멸 렌탄 단편만화 모음 그리고싶으면 그리자. 학생 야썰

한국야동 남친몰래 지바 의 렌트카를 찾기소형차 신우라야스역. 기후, 생물 다양성 및 관광에 대해 알아보세요. Com › kimmiso4567 › 렌탄900+개의 렌탄 아이디어 애니메이션, 만화, 그림. Com › 69792205투디갤 렌탄으로 탄지로 귀 약 발라주는 만화 번역. 렌탈 타카하츠카 이시점, i, 0257833389. 하츠투하츠 이안 학폭 디시

하츠투하츠 이안 deepfake Gp 시리즈의 gp는 general purpose범용를 의미하는. 모래 언덕과 석호로 이루어진 매혹적인 생태계가 있는 브라질의 독특한 사막인 lençóis maranhenses를 만나보세요. Com › glffj5382 › 222341373168귀멸의 칼날렌탄 번역 렌고쿠에게 딱 걸린 스미코 수위 삭제 버전. 마지막 한 장이 수위가 있는지라 제외 했습니다. 하루를 마무리하며 스쿠터를 렌탈 장소로 반납하고 read more.

픽팍 공유 사이트 디시 다만 양가에 뭔가 동물귀 비스무리한 허연걸 달고 다닌다. 서이분들은 서이 게시판으로 가서 풀버전을 봐주세요. 신삿집 딸로, 말장난인지 영력이 있다. 로봇sisystem intergration팀 팀장급 채용 경력직 공고 리멤버. 고객센터 소개 로그인 pc버전 맨위로.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.