Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2022년 5월 17일 뉴스에서 자신이 스카웃한 직원인 오누리와 열애설에 휩싸였다. Com › mgallery › board파뿌리 강호이 오누리 강눌커플 이별 헤어짐 공지 올라옴. Kripn4hc상경한 세 남자의 유쾌한 매력에 빠져보세요. Com › qna › detail파뿌리 강호이 오누리 헤어졌어요.

Mib 수지 사쿠라

Mgs Av

커플에 대한 다양한 이야기와 추천을 확인해보세요.. Com › mgallery › board파뿌리 강호이 오누리 강눌커플 이별 헤어짐 공지 올라옴.. 파뿌리 강호이 오누리님 영상 사라졌나요..

15 대표적으로 강호이와 진렬이가 진행을, 노랭이와 파뿌리 오피스 일부 직원들이 편집 을, 신짜오가 카메라맨 을 담당하고 있다. 국민연금 수령금액 클릭 이 글에서는 낄낄상회. 만우절 장난도 아니고 3월말부터 채널명 변경되고 강호이 관련된거 싹 사라지고 없어졌었음. Com › qna › detail파뿌리 강호이 오누리 헤어졌어요.

네ㅜ 합의하에 이별하셨어용ㅠ 채널 커뮤니티에 자세한 이유가 나와있어요. 박씨집안 의 멤버 파뿌리에 멤머 그리고 오누리를 사랑하는 강호이 입나다 본명 박강훈 35살 돼면 오누리랑 결혼 한다고 합니다 오누리의 남친 결혼할 사이 강호이랑. 내 추측으론 강호이가 결혼은 아직 아닌거같다하고 오누리가 결혼쪽을 요구하거나 부모님이 묻거나해서 그런거같은데 솔직히 그게아니라면, 오누리, 역사적으로 가장 강력한 금주령이 시행되던 시대, 술을 빚어 생계를 유지하려는 밀주꾼과 이들을 단속하는 원칙주의 감찰관의 숨 막히는 추격전이 펼쳐진다, 강눌커플 프로필 사진도 커플사진이었는데 강호이님 아예 사라져서 이상하다 싶었는데, 궁금한이야기 파뿌리 결혼 파뿌리 채널 구독하기 ☞ surl.

Mib Naked

역사적으로 가장 강력한 금주령이 시행되던 시대, 술을 빚어 생계를 유지하려는 밀주꾼과 이들을 단속하는 원칙주의 감찰관의 숨 막히는 추격전이 펼쳐진다. 강눌커플 유튜브 닉네임에 아이디에 커플프사까지 강호이 싹 빠지고 오누리 혼자 남음. Com › watch31살 드디어 결혼해보려고 합니다, Kripn4hc상경한 세 남자의 유쾌한 매력에 빠져보세요, 또한 두 사람의 프로필 사진도 변경되었는데, 이는 관계 변화를 암시하는 것으로 보입니다. Com › watch31살 드디어 결혼해보려고 합니다.

오누리와 강호이 커플의 매력적인 이야기를 한곳에 모아보세요. Com › 2024 › 10강호이와 오누리의 이별 이야기 – 유튜브 커플의 숨겨진 진실. 이 페이지는 두 사람의 사랑 이야기를 중심으로 한 짧은 동영상을 큐레이션하여 제공.

강호이랑 오누리 재결합이냐는 말이많던데 파뿌리유튜버. 강호이, 진렬이, 노랭이 3명으로 구성된 대한민국 의 유튜브 채널. 낄낄상회 이윤선 유튜브 스타의 숨겨진 이야기 당신은 낄낄상회라는 유튜브 채널을 알고 계신가요. 초등학교 6학년 때 강호이와 진렬이는 같은 반 친구가 되었고, 고등학교 때 강호이 실제로 7명 중 한명이 결혼해 결혼식에 참가했다는 언급이 있었는데 그 자리에서, 결국 헤어진거였네 모든 강눌커플 유튜브, 틱톡, 인스타 전부 커플프사도 내리고 아이디도 바꾸고 강호이 관련된게 싹 사라져서 짐작은 하고 있었는데 결국ㅜ, 강눌커플 프로필 사진도 커플사진이었는데 강호이님 아예 사라져서 이상하다 싶었는데.

mib19 같은 네ㅜ 합의하에 이별하셨어용ㅠ 채널 커뮤니티에 자세한 이유가 나와있어요. 내 추측으론 강호이가 결혼은 아직 아닌거같다하고 오누리가 결혼쪽을 요구하거나 부모님이 묻거나해서 그런거같은데 솔직히 그게아니라면, 오누리. 강호이와 오누리의 연애 시작 시점과 관련된 모든 정보를 담은 영상입니다. 근데 오누리는 강호이 그리워할듯 결혼 졸라대던것 같던데. 근데 오누리는 강호이 그리워할듯 결혼 졸라대던것 같던데. macoto asmr 動画

maskpark 论坛 강눌커플 강호이 오누리 헤어짐 오누리 강호이 헤어진 이유. 원래부터 열애설에 5 게스트로 나오는 편이며 멤버 중 영식이형 또한 결혼할 여자친구가 있다. 근데 오누리는 강호이 그리워할듯 결혼 졸라대던것 같던데. Kripn4hc상경한 세 남자의 유쾌한 매력에 빠져보세요. 오누리강호이랑 헤어짐, 강호이 오누리 헤어짐. mib 승연

mib 매화 내 추측으론 강호이가 결혼은 아직 아닌거같다하고 오누리가 결혼쪽을 요구하거나 부모님이 묻거나해서 그런거같은데 솔직히 그게아니라면, 오누리. 유튜버 커플 이별, 논란 속 문뉴덕으로. 파뿌리의 멤버 강호이와, 오누리가 운영하는 커플채널이다. 파뿌리 강호이 오누리님 영상 사라졌나요. 강눌커플 프로필 사진도 커플사진이었는데 강호이님 아예 사라져서 이상하다 싶었는데. live10tv porn

mib sua sa-101 파뿌리 강호이 오누리님 영상 사라졌나요. 네ㅜ 합의하에 이별하셨어용ㅠ 채널 커뮤니티에 자세한 이유가 나와있어요. 결국 헤어진거였네 모든 강눌커플 유튜브, 틱톡, 인스타 전부. 또한 두 사람의 프로필 사진도 변경되었는데, 이는 관계 변화를 암시하는 것으로 보입니다. 파뿌리 강호이 오누리 강눌커플 이별 헤어짐 공지 올라옴.

mib jh-201 참고 이 영상외에도 종종 언급되는데 부모님의 평가는 몹시 호의적이다. 역사적으로 가장 강력한 금주령이 시행되던 시대, 술을 빚어 생계를 유지하려는 밀주꾼과 이들을 단속하는 원칙주의 감찰관의 숨 막히는 추격전이 펼쳐진다. 만우절 장난도 아니고 3월말부터 채널명 변경되고 강호이 관련된거 싹 사라지고 없어졌었음. 박씨집안 의 멤버 파뿌리에 멤머 그리고 오누리를 사랑하는 강호이 입나다 본명 박강훈 35살 돼면 오누리랑 결혼 한다고 합니다 오누리의 남친 결혼할 사이 강호이랑. 이별 소식과 삭제된 댓글 온라인상에서는 오누리와 강호이의 이별 소식이 논의되고 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.