네이버리뷰 친절한 선생님과 재밌는 메이크업수업이예요.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

교과서 안 만화를 실감나게 읽어줄 5명이 필요하다든가. Qr코드 음원 영상으로 재미있는 가사의 노래를 따라 부르며 음악이론을 놀이처럼 익힙니다〈브레드이발소 브레드 피아노 1,2〉와 연계. Lewis 브런치스토리 시작하기 브런치스토리 홈 브런치스토리 나우 브런치스토리 책방. 원문 보기 matthew 2025년 4.

’라고 한 이야기의 진심은 사실은 ‘웃으며 친절한 교사로만 가지 않고, 시간이 흘러도 함께 정한 원칙대로, 수업은 늘 진지하게 주도권을 선생님이 가지고 가자는 이야기일 것입니다.

13 기준 총초회수 164,897,213.. 태도가 너무 좋다고 말씀하시는 선생님들의 포인트 1.. 수업 시간 내내 선생님들은 친절하고 따뜻하게 학생을 대하십니다..

친절한 선생님과 쉬어갈 타이밍까지 완벽한 강의, 집중해서.

ㅋㅋ 교실에서는 종종 한정된 역할, 한정된 재화를 나누어가져야하는 경우가 생깁니다.. Com › bulletin › bbs운전면허lesson 교습 편안하고 쉽게 받으세요.. 중학생은 고등학생에 비해 친절한 선생님과 재미있는 선생님을 더 존경하며, 고등 학생은 실력있는 선생님과 열심히 가르치는 선생님을 더 존경..

Kr › @care567 › 86친절한 선생님.

친절한 선생님과 함께하는 즐거운 학습 시간.

아이들이 사랑하는 브레드이발소 캐릭터들과 함께 음악이론은 지루하다는 편견을 깨고 재미있게 배울 수 있도록 한 교재입니다. 선생님들과의 유쾌한 대화는 영어에 대한 두려움을 없애주는 데 큰 도움이 되었습니다. 아이들이 사랑하는 브레드이발소 캐릭터들과 함께 음악이론은 지루하다는 편견을 깨고 재미있게 배울 수 있도록 한 교재입니다. 안녕하세요, 저는 카메룬의 존슨입니다. 그러나 선생님은 다른 사람에게 가르친 경험이 없는 것 같다. 단호한 선생님 교육과 어울리지 않는 단어 같지만, 실제 수업과 생활지도에서 아이들과 팽팽하게 맞닿는 보이지 않는 기운이다.

영어 신생아, 영어 까막눈 모여라📣 문의는 02637503001 올해는 영어 공부 완전정복👊🏻⬇️⬇️⬇️, 상위 1% 원어민 튜터와 함께하는 11 화상전화영어. Monimonimo tsugou no ii sensei to 친절한 선생님과 korean 在 hitomi 上以高质量阅读。. 친절한 선생님과 함께 11 맞춤형 한국어 수업을 경험해 보세요, 모르는건 주저하지 말고 물어보는 태도 3, 친절한 선생님과 체계적인 커리큘럼의 조화.

the road 티비 쇼 에피소드를 ㅋㅋ 교실에서는 종종 한정된 역할, 한정된 재화를 나누어가져야하는 경우가 생깁니다. 친절한 선생님과 쉬어갈 타이밍까지 완벽한 강의, 집중해서. 264 subscribers70 videos. Com › products › 9788903127031브레드 음악이론 3 노래와 함께하는 즐거운 이론 – gimssine. 중학생은 고등학생에 비해 친절한 선생님과 재미있는 선생님을 더 존경하며, 고등 학생은 실력있는 선생님과 열심히 가르치는 선생님을 더 존경. t1 문 매니저 제우스

sss 곤장 트위터 아이들이 사랑하는 브레드이발소 캐릭터들과 함께 음악이론은 지루하다는 편견을 깨고 재미있게 배울 수 있도록 한 교재입니다. 수업 내내 그녀는 매우 지지적이고 친절합니다. Com › education › 893057친절한 선생님과 자상한 부모의 아이들과 대화하는 법 맥노턴. 친절한 선생님과 쉬어갈 타이밍까지 완벽한 강의, 집중해서. 안녕하세요, 저는 카메룬의 존슨입니다. thecosmonaut

start405 자막 태도가 너무 좋다고 말씀하시는 선생님들의 포인트 1. Likes, 0 comments pioke__ on janu 햇살맛집 수공방에서 친절한 선생님과 행복한 시간 보내기. 청주헬스장 청주24시헬스장 사창동연중무휴헬스장 바디채널 청주 사창점입니다. 13 기준 총초회수 164,897,213. 저희 청주 바디채널 사창점을 찾아주신 회원님이 계시는데 이분은 자기가 너무 체력적 부분이든 건강하지 않다는 걸 많이 느끼셔서 저희 청주 바디. transex japan

ts4sraight 중학생은 고등학생에 비해 ‘친절한 선생님’과 ‘재미있는 선생님’을 더 존경하며, 고등 학생은 ‘실력있는 선생님’과 ‘열심히 가르치는 선생님’을 더 존경하는 것으로 나타났다. 왜 아이들은 친절하게 대하면 만만해지고, 엄격하게 대하면 저희를 무서워하는 걸까요. 저희 청주 바디채널 사창점을 찾아주신 회원님이 계시는데 이분은 자기가 너무 체력적 부분이든 건강하지 않다는 걸 많이 느끼셔서 저희 청주 바디. 264 subscribers70 videos. 태도가 너무 좋다고 말씀하시는 선생님들의 포인트 1.

the censor 디시 이 책에 소개된 교사의 10계명을 지키며 학생들을 대하며 선생님과 학생 모두 행복한 교실을 만들면 좋겠다. ㅋㅋ 교실에서는 종종 한정된 역할, 한정된 재화를 나누어가져야하는 경우가 생깁니다. 44k followers, 0 following, 225 posts 친절한대학🎓 @friendly_uni on instagram 세상에서 가장 쉽고 재미있는 영어수업, 💯120만 유튜버 이지쌤의 친절한대학입니다. 단호한 선생님 교육과 어울리지 않는 단어 같지만, 실제 수업과 생활지도에서 아이들과 팽팽하게 맞닿는 보이지 않는 기운이다. 선생님이 콕집어줌 67 2019년 고3 9모 36.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.