Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

요코하마 시, daikoku promenade 방문을 위해 여행을 계획 중이세요. 요코하마의 호텔 요금이 가장 저렴한 달은 언제인가요. 가는 길에 711 편의점이 있고, 호텔 맞은편에는 매일 이용했던 로손 편의점이 있습니다. 숙소는 레스토랑, 실내 수영장, 피트니스 센터뿐 아니라 테라스도 갖추고 있습니다.

버튜버 굴포차

부치 디시

Kr › hotels › japan요코하마 시, hachiman shrine 근처 저렴한 호텔 스카이스캐너.. 미츠이 가든 호텔 요코하마 미나토미라이 프리미어 기본 요금은 123,287원부터 959,747원까지이며, 1076개의 후기 기준 평점은 9.. 오늘 판매사 수백 곳의 상품을 비교하고 저렴한 가격에 예약해 보세요..

클룩에서 요코하마 호텔 이용후기, 가격 비교, 숙소 사진, 할인 혜택까지 간편하게 확인하실 수 있습니다. 위치, 청결, 시설, 가격까지 꼼꼼하게 비교하여 나에게 딱 맞는 호텔을 찾아보세요, 일본 요코하마에서 조금 경제적으로 투숙하고 싶어서 발견한 5만원대 가성비 숙소 워싱턴 호텔, 다채로운 매력을 지닌 요코하마의 추천 호텔 10곳을 소개합니다. 요코하마 요코하마 사쿠라기초 워싱턴 호텔 – 최저가 보장 예약.

브레인롯 훔치기 특성 나무위키

일본 요코하마 요코하마국립대학교 근처 호텔 베스트 10, 투숙객은 바 등의 시설을 이용할 수 있습니다. 호텔 체인, 편의시설, 가격 등을 기준으로 검색 결과를 원하는 대로 변경해 보세요.

Apa hotel ＆ resort yokohama bay tower 2. 특히 요코하마 여행에서 숙소 선택은 정말 중요하죠. Kr › hotels › japan요코하마 시, mutsukawa central park 근처 저렴한 호텔 스카이스캐, 특히 요코하마 여행에서 숙소 선택은 정말 중요하죠, 호텔 리브맥스 신 요코하마 무인 체크인 시스템으로 빠르게 숙소에 입실할 수 있어 시간이 촉박한 여행자에게 좋습니다. 요코하마의 호텔 요금은 어떻게 되나요.

위치, 청결, 시설, 가격까지 꼼꼼하게 비교하여 나에게 딱 맞는 호텔을 찾아보세요. 요코하마의 호텔 가격이 가장 저렴한 달은 평균 요금이 253,200,896원인 1월입니다, 객실 예약이 가능한 316건의 신요코하마호텔 중에서 딱 맞는 신요코하마 역주변의 호텔을 예약하세요. 미나토미라이역이 도보로 단 1분 거리에 있습니다. 요코하마 시, hachiman shrine 방문을 위해 여행을 계획 중이세요.

보넥도 사주 디시

Kr › 요코하마호텔요코하마 인기 호텔 16개. 요코하마 에는 숙소가 441 곳 있으며, 요금 데이터 마지막 업데이트 일자는 2026년 1월 22일 입니다. Com › kokr › city2026 요코하마 호텔 추천 아고다 agoda. 요코하마 호텔 top5 요코하마 가성비 숙소 top 5 비교 요코하마 여행, 숙소 고민은 이제 그만. Com › budget › city일본 요코하마 저가 호텔 베스트 10 booking. 1050 호텔 미야기현 900 호텔 사이타마현 870 호텔 이바라키현 809 호텔 야마가타현 785 호텔 오카야마현 780 호텔 나라현 747 호텔 시가현 744 호텔 이와테현 714 호텔 에히메현 668 호텔 시마네현 646 호텔 미야자키현 615 호텔 야마구치현 594 호텔 후쿠이현 591 호텔 도야.

호텔 리브맥스 신 요코하마 무인 체크인 시스템으로 빠르게 숙소에 입실할 수 있어 시간이 촉박한 여행자에게 좋습니다. 숙소는 레스토랑, 실내 수영장, 피트니스 센터뿐 아니라 테라스도 갖추고 있습니다, 요코하마의 숙박 요금이 가장 저렴한 날은 1박당 평균 요금이 166,134원인 일요일입니다. 요코하마의 저렴한 호텔 apa 호텔 & 리조트 요코하마 베이 타워 시타딘스 하버 프론트 요코하마 요코하마 도큐 rei 호텔 소테츠 프레사 인 요코하마 히가시구치 호텔. 숙소 요금이 더 저렴하다면 이 근처에 머무는 것도 좋은 선택이 될 수 있어요.

벨 성형

가는 길에 711 편의점이 있고, 호텔 맞은편에는 매일 이용했던 로손 편의점이 있습니다. 도쿄tyo행 항공권을 최저 85,063원에 만나보세요, 요코하마 시, yamate miharashi park 방문을 위해 여행을 계획 중이세요. 도쿄요코하마 인터컨티넨탈 요코하마 피어8 요코하마 최상위 호텔 intercontinen yokohama pier8 2024. 요코하마의 매력을 발견하고, 다양한 숙소 옵션을 통해 더 풍부한 여행 경험을 즐겨보세요.

뷰러 효짱 5성급 호텔부터 가성비 숙소까지 요코하마 추천 숙소 top 10을 여기어때 특가로 만나보세요. 객실 예약이 가능한 316건의 신요코하마호텔 중에서 딱 맞는 신요코하마 역주변의 호텔을 예약하세요. 호텔스컴바인에서 사쿠라기초 역의 호텔 상품을 한눈에 비교하세요. 두 번째로 저렴한 호텔은 다이와 로이넷 호텔 심바시이며, 자동차로 43분 거리에 있어요. 요코하마 여행, 가성비 좋은 숙소를 찾고 계신가요. 밴드 라이브 야동

브레인롯 훔치기 세미 요코하마의 호텔 요금은 어떻게 되나요. 요코하마 시, daikoku promenade 방문을 위해 여행을 계획 중이세요. 위치는 편리한 편이며, 오도리역에서 도보 5분 거리에 있고 엘리베이터를 이용해 지하철역까지 갈 수 있습니다. 인천 항공편을 131,200원 부터 kayak. Kr › 요코하마호텔요코하마 인기 호텔 16개. 백하 모또모또

베트남 딸참수 디시 요코하마 시, mutsukawa central park 방문을 위해 여행을 계획 중이세요. Kr › 요코하마호텔요코하마 인기 호텔 16개. 요코하마 센트럴 호스텔 좀 더 사교적인 경험을 원하는 분들을 위해 요코하마 센트럴 호스텔은 친근한 분위기와 저렴한 기숙사 스타일의 숙박 시설을 제공합니다. 요코하마 라포르근처 위치한 인기 호텔 290개 실시간 최저가를 확인하고, 최대 30% 할인과 검증된 여행자 리뷰로 당신을 위한 최고의 호텔을 찾아보세요. 요코하마 사쿠라기초 역 22개의 호텔 이용 후기를 확인해보세요. 보추 수도꼭지

버티면 섹스 수천 개의 사용자 후기를 바탕으로 집계한 호텔 평점을 비교해 보세요. 호텔명필수체크바로가기sotetsu fresa inn yokohama higashiguchi2020년 신축, 요코하마역 340m, 무료 wifi, 기계식 체크인아웃최저가 확인하기호텔 더 낫 요코하마레트로 크루즈 컨셉, 최상층 전망, 패밀리룸 및 바레스토랑 보유최저가 확인하기캡슐 플러스. 객실부터 편의시설, 위치, 주변 관광지까지 꼼꼼하게 비교 분석해서 여러분의 취향에 딱 맞는 호텔을 찾아드릴게요. 위치는 편리한 편이며, 오도리역에서 도보 5분 거리에 있고 엘리베이터를 이용해 지하철역까지 갈 수 있습니다. 숙소 요금이 더 저렴하다면 이 근처에 머무는 것도 좋은 선택이 될 수 있어요.

버 튜버 니니 얼굴 6점, 훌륭해요, 이용 후기 5,195개. 일본 요코하마에서의 완벽한 숙소 찾기. 투숙객은 바 등의 시설을 이용할 수 있습니다. 스카이스캐너 파트너사 중 평점이 가장 높은 업체는 toyota rent a car, alamo 및 orix입니다. 2025년 2월에 오픈한 더 게이트 호텔 요코하마 입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.