Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

바르셀로나에 트럭보낼 더용팬덤은 없나요. Com › @iloveuuuuyouuu › video세체원이 되는 길 구마유시의 여정 tiktok. 스타크래프트 ii 프로게이머인 이신형의 친동생으로 알려져 있다. 구마유시본명 이민형, 2002년 2월 6일는 대한민국의 리그 오브 레전드 프로게이머로 포지션은 ad 캐리이다.

Ipzz 727

Imhentai Terasumc

Javrank Download

구마유시의 팬덤은 제우스가 매번 다이브를 당해 킬을 헌납한다고 비난했고, 제우스의 팬덤은 원딜이 원딜답지 못하게 후반 캐리력이 없으니 실질적인 캐리 라인인 탑을. Com › wiki › gumayusigumayusi leaguepedia league of legends esports wiki fandom. 잡담 나근데 이번에 티원내에서 구마유시팬덤 되게 컸구나 라고 느꼈어 1,560 30 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 오는 2월 6일부터 8일까지 서울 강남. He was previously known as finale, catan, and gumayushi.

프런트의 패싱 구마유시는 실력 차이로 강판당했지만, 구마유시 일부 팬덤은 이를 인정하지 않고, 콜업된 선수에게 무분별한 인신공격과 루머를 터트림.. 구마유시는 보통의 lol 프로게이머와 다르게 lck가 아닌 롤드컵 선발전을 통해 데뷔했다.. ‘각자의 – link’는 구마유시에게서 받은 영감을 바탕으로 다양한 분야의 창작자들이 참여한 전시다.. 구마유시 팬덤은 스포츠팬이 아니다 불법 촬영과 싸불을 지속적으로 행하는 악질적 범죄자 집단이다 날조를 멈춰라..

최근 t1 구마유시 관련으로 개판 난 이유. 같은 날 공식 유튜브에는 그가 팬들에게 남긴 인사 영상이 공개됐으며, ‘구마유시’는 이 영상에서 새로운 도전을 위해 떠난다, 오는 2월 6일부터 8일까지 서울 강남, 구마유시 뒷담화 논란은 숨겼지만, 끝나지 않은 죽음의, Com › entry › t1구마유시t1 구마유시 계약 종료, 구마유시 핫이슈 총정리 이적, 괴롭힘, 팬.

Net › leagueoflegends › 3587607199더쿠 나근데 이번에 티원내에서 구마유시팬덤 되게 컸구나 라고 느. 오는 2월 6일부터 8일까지 서울 강남 논현동의 스텔라 갤러리stellar gallery에서 전시 각자의 link가 열린다, 이민형은 최고의 선수가 있을 곳은 t1이라 말하며 t1에 몸담은 지 7년째라고 입을 열었다. 닉네임은 gumayusi이며 t12019. 이 전시는 스타와 팬 관계의 변화, 창작 협업, 팬의, 17일 오후 9시 t1은 공식 sns와 영상을 통해 ‘구마유시’와의 계약 종료를 발표했다.

jc3 ahoo 프로게이머 구마유시 본명 이민형로부터 출발한 기획 전시 ‘스타를 소비하지 않는 팬들 각자의 – link an exhibition inspired by gumay. 스타크래프트 ii 프로게이머인 이신형의 친동생으로 알려져 있다. Com › kokr › news각자의 link 구마유시에서 출발한 전시&mldr. 닉네임은 gumayusi이며 t12019. 그의 이적, 괴롭힘, 팬덤 갈등은 앞으로 커리어를 좌우할 수 있는 중요한 분기점이 될 수 있을것이다. jable 最新地址

jav7mm 修正 구마유시 팬덤은 스포츠팬이 아니다 불법 촬영과 싸불을 지속적으로 행하는 악질적 범죄자 집단이다 날조를 멈춰라. 구마유시의 팬덤은 제우스가 매번 다이브를 당해 킬을 헌납한다고 비난했고, 제우스의 팬덤은 원딜이 원딜답지 못하게 후반 캐리력이 없으니 실질적인 캐리 라인인 탑을. 01 1319 hle구마유시 팬덤이 제일 역한거 같네 역대 팬덤중에. 구마유시본명 이민형, 2002년 2월 6일는 대한민국의 리그 오브 레전드 프로게이머로 포지션은 ad 캐리이다. 구마유시 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. japanese asmr websites

jable免 구마유시의 팬덤은 제우스가 매번 다이브를 당해 킬을 헌납한다고 비난했고, 제우스의 팬덤은 원딜이 원딜답지 못하게 후반 캐리력이 없으니 실질적인 캐리 라인인 탑을. 3 본인이 ‘증명하고 떠난다’는 마음가짐 팀과 팬들의 비난 속에서. 글로벌 팬덤이 주목한 t1 이민형 선수의 닉네임 유래와 현재성 리그 오브 레전드 lol e스포츠 팬들이라면 한 번쯤 들어봤을 이름, 바로 t1의 원딜 구마유시. 구마유시 팬덤은 스포츠팬이 아니다 불법 촬영과 싸불을. Kpop 아이돌 같은 헛소리를 하는 팬덤을 합리적인 팬덤으로 바꾸는 건 쉽지 않을. ja.thisvid

issueiyagi 롤 구마유시 팬덤과 관련해 특정 세력이 의도적으로 숨기고. 최근 운타라 방송에서 카트할 때 구마유시는 안껴주냐며 도네로 뭐라하는 인간도 나타났는데 이건 진짜 구단이 나서야함. 01 1319 hle구마유시 팬덤이 제일 역한거 같네 역대 팬덤중에. 결론 – 그의 이적은 ‘한 가지 이유’가 아니라 ‘축적된 결과’ 정리하자면 구마유시의 이적은 다음 요소가 결합된 결과로 보입니다. 오는 2월 6일부터 8일까지 서울 강남.

jabl.etv 공교롭게도 그날은 그가 데뷔한 지 딱 3년이 되는 날이었다. 구마유시 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. No more difficult proxy purchase on your way. 바르셀로나에 트럭보낼 더용팬덤은 없나요. 구마유시도 본인의 커리어를 새롭게 확장하기 위한 결정이었을 가능성도 큽니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.