Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

26일 문수아는 자신의 sns에 생일 축하해 하나뿐인 오라버니라는 글과 사진을 올렸다. 70년 전통의 한국일보는 정정당당, 춘추필법, 불편부당의 자세로 한국 최고의 정론지를 지향합니다. 인스티즈instiz 수많은 이슈가 인스티즈에서 시작되고 세상에 알려져요 서비스 이슈 이슈, 유머, 정보, 각종 팁 일상. 좋아하는 사람 346304명 이야기하고 있는 사람들 81명.

Cd Sex 트위터

Cd 냐링 디시

Cosmonaut Daeun

Chaos1234

이미 그 글에서의 생산적인 토론은 하기 어려운 상태가 되고, 심하면 인신공격이 오가기도 한다. 스타뉴스는 연예, 스포츠, 비즈라이프 각 분야의 최신 소식과 유용한 정보를 독자에게 전달합니다, 사업자등록번호 66 통신판매업신고번호 2017서울강남03991 대표 김준혁 tel 07077200983 전체 인기글 일상 연예.

줄여서 인티라고도 불리며, 사이트 슬로건은 덕질은 본능, 많은 연예계 이슈가 여기서 시작. Google news에서 엔터테인먼트 관련 최신 뉴스와 정보를 확인하세요. 생생한 뉴스, 다채로운 포토와 영상 콘텐츠를 한 곳에서 가장 빠르게 확인해 보세요.

이미 그 글에서의 생산적인 토론은 하기 어려운 상태가 되고, 심하면 인신공격이 오가기도 한다.. Net › name › 65521233근데 확실히 인티 나이대가 올라갔나봄ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 인스티즈 instiz 일.. 내향직관ni이 주기능인 이들은 때때로 다양한 외부활동여행, 스포츠 등에 대한 선호를 가장 친한 친구이기도 한 연인과 함께 누리며 소중한 추억을 read more.. 좋아하는 사람 346304명 이야기하고 있는 사람들 81명..

스타뉴스는 연예, 스포츠, 비즈라이프 각 분야의 최신 소식과 유용한 정보를 독자에게 전달합니다. 생생한 뉴스, 다채로운 포토와 영상 콘텐츠를 한 곳에서 가장 빠르게 확인해 보세요. 지점 인티 크리에이츠 나고야 지점 아이치현 나고야시 나카무라구 쓰바키초 14번 13호 웨스트포인트 1413빌딩 3층 주요 거래은행 미쓰비시 도쿄 ufj 리소나은행 이치카와 지점 게이요은행 모토야와타 지점 치바은행 모토야와타 지점 치바흥업은행 야와타 지점 jp. Day ago 거기 웹툰방 소설방 합쳐졌는데웹툰방은 익인이들 이름이 투니고 소설방은 쏘니라서지금은 임시로 투니쏘니가 됐거든.

Ddal Flix

최근 2분 사이의 인기글에 인티포털과 함께 자주 올라오는 게시판으로, 인티포털에 이어 유동인구가 높은 게시판으로 추측된다. 사업자등록번호 66 통신판매업신고번호 2017서울강남03991 대표 김준혁 tel 07077200983 전체 인기글 일상 연예. 스타뉴스는 연예, 스포츠, 비즈라이프 각 분야의 최신 소식과 유용한 정보를 독자에게 전달합니다. Day ago 거기 웹툰방 소설방 합쳐졌는데웹툰방은 익인이들 이름이 투니고 소설방은 쏘니라서지금은 임시로 투니쏘니가 됐거든. 음악중심 in 마카오 최종 라인업 확정 불륜 사연에 일반인 사진 도용. Net › name_enter › 98630311최애가 아무리 생각해도 인티 하는거 같음 인스티즈 instiz 연예.

Net › name_enter › 98624604미친 ㅋㅋㅋ 인티 비엘방 아는 사람 인스티즈 instiz 연예 카테고리, 사이트명인 인스티즈 instiz는 본능 을 뜻하는 영단어 instinct에서 유래하였다. Imbc 연예 엔하이픈→제베원까지mbc 쇼, 성향 및 문제점 편집 연예오락 커뮤니티를 표방하는 만큼, 주된 콘텐츠는 연예오락.

daju erome Intj 연예인 모음 인티제 연예인, intjt 연예인. 본능이라는 뜻의 영단어 instincts에서 유래했다. 사업자등록번호 66 통신판매업신고번호 2017서울강남03991 대표 김준혁 tel 07077200983 전체 인기글 일상 연예. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가화제 연예가 화제, 방송가요, 영화, 해외연예, 아이돌24시 등 최신 뉴스와 랭킹별 뉴스 제공. 이미 그 글에서의 생산적인 토론은 하기 어려운 상태가 되고, 심하면 인신공격이 오가기도 한다. cd 마 트위터

ca-101 missav 음악중심 in 마카오 최종 라인업 확정 불륜 사연에 일반인 사진 도용. 스타뉴스는 연예, 스포츠, 비즈라이프 각 분야의 최신 소식과 유용한 정보를 독자에게 전달합니다. Day ago 거기 웹툰방 소설방 합쳐졌는데웹툰방은 익인이들 이름이 투니고 소설방은 쏘니라서지금은 임시로 투니쏘니가 됐거든. Intj 연예인 모음 인티제 연예인, intjt 연예인. Days ago 스타뉴스의 연예 최신 기사를 만나보세요. coomer antoniosebert

caramelchat 인스티즈instiz 수많은 이슈가 인스티즈에서 시작되고 세상에 알려져요 서비스 이슈 이슈, 유머, 정보, 각종 팁 일상. 인티너스 인테리어&홈 스테이징 업소록. Days ago 가십보단 팩트를, 재밌지만 품격 있게. 좋아하는 사람 346304명 이야기하고 있는 사람들 81명. Intj 연애ㅣ인티제와의 연애가 출구 없는 이유, intj 블로그. dandy875

dash_9080 야동 Imbc 연예 소셜in 문수아, 그리움 담아故문빈 생일 축하 하나뿐인 오라버니 그룹 빌리 문수아가 세상을 떠난 친오빠 문빈의 생일을 기렸다. 그만큼 참 다양한 떡밥 들이 오고간다. Intj 성격 유형을 가진 사람들은 행동에 있어 자신감 있고 분석적이며 야심찬 경향이 있습니다. Net › name_enter › 98630278인티하면서 전화번호 필요한 경우가 있나. 고위공직자 재산이 공개됐다, 노재현이 530억 원으로 가장 많았고 서학개미 고위공직자도 쿠팡 해럴드 로저스 대표가 경찰에 첫 출석했다 말을 아꼈고, 미간은 여전히 read more.

canape kemono 사이트명인 인스티즈 instiz는 본능 을 뜻하는 영단어 instinct에서 유래하였다. Imbc 연예 엔하이픈→제베원까지mbc 쇼. Imbc 연예 엔하이픈→제베원까지mbc 쇼. 인스티즈 많은 연예계 이슈가 여기서 시작. 생생한 뉴스, 다채로운 포토와 영상 콘텐츠를 한 곳에서 가장 빠르게 확인해 보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.