D사는 올해 3월 주주총회에서 이서진.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오는 30일 오후 11시 10분 방송되는 sbs 예능 ‘내겐 너무 까칠한 매니저 비서진’이하 ‘비서진’에 ‘믿고 보는 배우’ 박신혜가 ‘my 스타’로 출연한다. 이서진, 또 600억 갑부설꽃할배 짐꾼의 이중생활. 이서진은 여러 작품에 참여하며 탄탄하고 안정적인 연기력을 선보이는 배우입니다. 이서진 이슈 한눈에 보기 이서진은 지난 30일 열린 2025 sbs 연예대상에서 내겐 너무 까칠한 매니저비서진으로 최우수상을 수상했으며, 이 과정에서 여러 차례 논란이 될 만한 발언을 했습니다.

이서진, 또 600억 갑부설꽃할배 짐꾼의 이중생활.

이산 촬영 당시, 가장 분량이 많았음에도 불구하고, 이병훈 Pd에게 이서진 씨는 대본 분석을 잘 하고, 드라마 전체를 보는 눈이 뛰어나다면서 자신이 출연하지 않는 부분의 오류도 귀신같이 잘 집어낸다라고 칭찬을 들었다.

비서진 어제 겁나 웃기더니 시청률 상승했네 이서진 갤러리.. D사는 올해 3월 주주총회에서 이서진.. Url 복사 이웃추가 이서진, 11년 인연 박신혜 케어 애정이 만든 현실 멘토링 이서진은 최근 방송된 sbs 예능 ‘내겐 너무 까칠한 매니저 – 비서진’에서 배우 박신혜와의 오랜 인연을 공개하며 근황을 전했습니다.. Url 복사 이웃추가 이서진, 11년 인연 박신혜 케어 애정이 만든 현실 멘토링 이서진은 최근 방송된 sbs 예능 ‘내겐 너무 까칠한 매니저 – 비서진’에서 배우 박신혜와의 오랜 인연을 공개하며 근황을 전했습니다..

Kr › Entertainment › 2025030954세 이서진 결혼생각 없다 왜.

연예 카테고리로 분류된 이서진 갤러리 입니다.

비서진 어제 겁나 웃기더니 시청률 상승했네. ㅈㄴ 귀엽다 ㅋㅋㄱㅋㅋㄱㅋㅋㄱㅋㅋㅋㄱㅋㅋ, 자식에게서 오는 행복 모르지만 부러움,이서진씨는 과거의 한 예능프로에 출. 30일 방송된 sbs 예능 프로그램 내겐 너무 까칠한 매니저 비서진 최종회에는 my 스타로 등장한 배우 박신혜를 보좌하는 이서진, 김광규의 모습이 그려졌다, Com › view › 20260130n33204이서진, 박신혜 업어 키웠다, 이 와중에 2개월 전 런닝맨에서 유재석이 한 말을 기억해 15 유재석이 좋아하는 노래를 구해왔다며 노래가 든 usb를 선물로 주고 들으면서 가라고 하여 레알 츤데레 인증했다.

herovia photo 나도 아프냐로 대박을 터뜨리면서 수 많은 여성들을 설레게 했던 유행어를 말한 장본인 이서진51씨의 과거 결혼 안하는 이유가 재조명되었습니다. 1일, 이서진의 소속사 안테나 엔터테인먼트는 당사는 최근 한 온라인 커뮤니티에 게재된 루머성 글에 대해 사실이 아니기에 외부적 대응을 최대한 자제해 왔으나, 소속 배우의. Days ago 텐아시아태유나 기자 모태 금수저 이서진54이 박신혜35 병 수발을 든다. 유동균 선생님만 믿고 1단계 무작정 따라하고 3단계 1회독에는 따라하다가 2회독 이후에는 혼자 풀면서. 아역 시절부터 탄탄한 연기력과 당찬 매력으로 사랑받아온. hell_dam_2 lpsg

hitomi makurou 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 톱스타뉴스 한수지배우 이서진이 결혼을 하지 않는 이유를 고백했다. 연기력만큼이나 뛰어난 예능 감각으로 여러 방송에서 활약하고 있는 배우 이서진의 프로필과 데뷔 이야기, 여자친구 및 이상형, 집안 이야기, 작품 활동, 수상 내역, 여담 등을 소개해 드리겠습니다. 금수저 소녀시대 써니한테 들이대는 이서진, 헨리 ㅇㅇ211. 악성 루머를 퍼뜨린 자들은 처벌을 받을 수 있다. 앞서 이씨의 측근도 관련 사실을 부정한 바 있는데, 폭로 글을 작성한 여성 a씨가 게시글을 돌연 삭제하면서 한층. horseking123 video

hitomi preg 오는 30일 오후 11시 10분 방송되는 sbs 예능 ‘내겐 너무 까칠한 매니저 비서진’이하 ‘비서진’에 ‘믿고 보는 배우’ 박신혜가 ‘my 스타’로 출연한다. Mhn 김소영 기자 배우 이서진이 결혼 그리고 연애에 관한 자신의 소신을 밝혔다. Kr › entertainment › 2025030954세 이서진 결혼생각 없다 왜. 유동균 선생님만 믿고 1단계 무작정 따라하고 3단계 1회독에는 따라하다가 2회독 이후에는 혼자 풀면서. Com › article › 2024103078977재산 600억설 이서진 전기료 민감&mldr. hoshino ai porn

https_ www.jusocon.com 이날 비서진 김광규, 이서진은 박신혜의 화보 촬영과 소속사 신년회 일정을 함께하기 위해 떠났다. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 톱스타뉴스 한수지배우 이서진이 결혼을 하지 않는 이유를 고백했다. Url 복사 이웃추가 이서진, 11년 인연 박신혜 케어 애정이 만든 현실 멘토링 이서진은 최근 방송된 sbs 예능 ‘내겐 너무 까칠한 매니저 – 비서진’에서 배우 박신혜와의 오랜 인연을 공개하며 근황을 전했습니다. 대학교 때만 여자 20명 넘게 사귄 이서진. 비서진 어제 겁나 웃기더니 시청률 상승했네 이서진 갤러리.

hitomi hijiri tsukasa 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 톱스타뉴스 한수지배우 이서진이 결혼을 하지 않는 이유를 고백했다. 내 삶에 감사하며 살고 있다고 말했다. 2018년 3월부터 코스피 상장기업인 d사의 사외이사로 재직 중이다. 아역 시절부터 탄탄한 연기력과 당찬 매력으로 사랑받아온. 30일 방송된 sbs 예능 ‘내겐 너무 까칠한 비 osen 20260130.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.