Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

닥터마틴 1461스무스 처음 사봤는데, 사자마자 원더발삼. 보통 원더발삼은 필수구매하는 듯하구 방수스프레이는 케바케 원더발삼으로 보통 가죽으로된 소재는 대부분 관리가능하지만 벨벳소재나 허용 안되는 닥터마틴 소재가 있을수 있으니 주의하세요. 물엿 세 스푼 고추장 네 스푼을 넣고 섞어. 원더 발삼은 부츠의 주름 정도를 멈추거나막거나줄여주지는 않지만, 부츠 방수에 도움이 되고 조금 부드럽게 해줄 거야.

카리나 펨돔

치어리더도끼

소중한 닥터마틴의 가죽을 새것처럼 유지하고 오래 깨끗하게 신으려고 닥터마틴 원더발삼도 구매했습니다. 하지만 혀 부분은 전혀 부드러워지지 않았고 여전히 뻣뻣하고 플라스틱 같은 read more. Com › mgallery › board닥터마틴 1461스무스 처음 사봤는데, 사자마자 원더발삼 바르면 좋나. Com › mgallery › board닥터마틴 1461스무스 처음 사봤는데, 사자마자 원더발삼 바르면 좋나.

카츠키 바쿠고

닥터마틴 공식홈페이지에서 해당 제품에 대한 care가 있습니다.. Com › mgallery › board닥터마틴 갈라짐 정상임..

카리나 할매젖 디시

Com › entry › 닥터마틴원더발삼닥터마틴 원더발삼 닥터마틴 관리. 존x 자니까 이요원, 사춘기 딸에 돌직구 보고싶었어 0 np포토레이싱 모델 오아희 섹시매력 뿜뿜 0 이것이 섹시 엘프. 부드러운천 두 장과 약간의 물, 그리고 원더발삼 한 통을 준비해주세요. 부드러운천 두 장과 약간의 물, 그리고 원더발삼 한 통을 준비해주세요. 하지만 혀 부분은 전혀 부드러워지지 않았고 여전히 뻣뻣하고 플라스틱 같은 read more.

닥터마틴 페트리샤 관리 후기 with 원더발삼, 울트라 프로텍터. 저는 ssg 몰에서 9,000원 주고샀어요. 원더발삼 주기적으로 바르면서 연화만 잘해주면.

Com › judyami › 222708491926닥터마틴 전용 구두약 원더발삼으로 오래도록 함께하기 네이버 블로, 원더 발삼은 부츠의 주름 정도를 멈추거나막거나줄여주지는 않지만, 부츠 방수에 도움이 되고 조금 부드럽게 해줄 거야. 부드러운천 두 장과 약간의 물, 그리고 원더발삼 한 통을 준비해주세요, 닥터마틴 가죽관리 원더발삼 사용기 블로그. 천연가죽제품에만 좋은 효과가 있으며 숨쉬지않는 인조가죽에는 발라봤자 효과 없음, 부드러운천 두 장과 약간의 물, 그리고 원더발삼 한 통을 준비해주세요.

비교적 고가라서 어떻게 관리를 해야 하나 보니깐 닥터마틴 전용 가죽 클리너 원더발삼 wonder balsam이라는 것이 있더라고요, 패션리뷰 닥터마틴 화이트 스티치 1461 ws 4년간 예쁘게. Com › board › mf닥터마틴 신는사람 있음.

닥터마틴 전용 구두약 원더발삼으로 오래도록 함께하기.. 물엿 세 스푼 고추장 네 스푼을 넣고 섞어.. 우선, 약간의 흙이 묻어도 괜찮은 작업대를 찾아보세요..

카마천국

물엿 세 스푼 고추장 네 스푼을 넣고 섞어, 인터넷에서 배송비를 포함하면 1만 원이 조금은 넘는데. 원더 발삼은 부츠의 주름 정도를 멈추거나막거나줄여주지는 않지만, 부츠 방수에 도움이 되고 조금 부드럽게 해줄 거야. 인터넷에서 배송비를 포함하면 1만 원이 조금은 넘는데. 닥터마틴전용 원더발삼 을 구입하게 되었습니다.

칭칭언니 노래 닥터마틴 원더발삼 닥터마틴 관리 수동응답기 티스토리. Com › entry › 닥터마틴원더발삼닥터마틴 원더발삼 닥터마틴 관리. 닥터마틴에어웨어코리아 주 서울특별시 강남구 도산대로 318 sb타워 14층 1,2호 사업자번호 12 사업자정보확인 통신판매업신고 2013서울마포1212호 개인정보관리책임자 이태영 대표이사 챈카키데렉 이메일 hello@drmartens. 주름지는건 상관없는데 갈라지네 씨벌 닥터마틴1461 모노 블랙임 원더발삼인가는 존나 쳐발랐음 구두약 바르면 나아짐. 우선, 약간의 흙이 묻어도 괜찮은 작업대를 찾아보세요. 칸도 뜻

카리나 마이너 갤러리 패션리뷰 닥터마틴 화이트 스티치 1461 ws 4년간 예쁘게. 사자마자 한번신고 원더발삼인가 쳐바르고. 집에서 장어구이 먹는 클라스는 우리집만 가능. 원더발삼 주기적으로 바르면서 연화만 잘해주면. 비교적 고가라서 어떻게 관리를 해야 하나 보니깐 닥터마틴 전용 가죽 클리너 원더발삼 wonder balsam이라는 것이 있더라고요. 카야 빨간약

카일 딕슨 가격에 대비해서 엄청 양이 많지는 않다. 오늘은 닥터마틴 원더발삼으로 구두 관리한 후기 들고 왔다. 본문 기타 기능 얼마전에 닥터마틴 1460 8홀 모델을 구매했었죠. 구두 관리 어렵다고만 생각했는데, 원더발삼. 인터넷쇼핑몰 검색하다가 그냥 매장가서 10,000원에 구입완료. 케데헌 조이 영어로

카에데 카렌 패션리뷰 닥터마틴 화이트 스티치 1461 ws 4년간 예쁘게 에이징 시킨 착샷 데일리룩 & 닥터마틴 원더발삼 관리 방법을 파헤쳐 봐요. 패션리뷰 닥터마틴 화이트 스티치 1461 ws 4년간 예쁘게 에이징 시킨 착샷 데일리룩 & 닥터마틴 원더발삼 관리 방법을 파헤쳐 봐요. 그냥 아무 구두약이나 살까 하다가 이왕 구입하는거 닥터마틴전용 원더발삼 을 구입하게 되었습니다. 천연가죽제품에만 좋은 효과가 있으며 숨쉬지않는 인조가죽에는 발라봤자 효과 없음. 대부분은 문제될 게 없지만 잘 안 보이게 새 것처럼 보이는 건 좀 귀찮아요.

카르멘 주요 아리아 예쁜 닥터마틴을 오랫동안 신으면서 내 발 모양과 걸음걸이에 맞게 주름지우고 길들일 수도 있다. 나파같은 무광한테도 써줘야 하는 건가요. 그냥 아무 구두약이나 살까 하다가 이왕 구입하는거. 비교적 고가라서 어떻게 관리를 해야 하나 보니깐 닥터마틴 전용 가죽 클리너 원더발삼 wonder balsam이라는 것이 있더라고요. 구매 이후 길들이는 시기에 발라주시면 가죽을 더 부드럽게 해서 편하고 빠르게 길들이기 좋다고 해요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.