Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Kr 노즈잇 노즈잇내돈 노즈잇내돈내산 코교정기 복코교정기 콧볼교정기 콧볼축소 콧볼축소기 콧대교정기 콧대높이기 코라인교정 내돈내산 왓츠인마이블로그 2025블로그챌린지 노즈잇 노즈잇내돈 + 10 이웃추가. 노즈잇 한 번쯤은 진짜 시도해볼만한템. 일상이야기 코 콤플렉스 해결방법 코교정기 노즈잇 내돈내산 리뷰 2025. 교정하는 거예오 연골로 구성되어 있는 곳들과 코 근육들을 잡아주는 원리라고 합니당 저는 콧대가.

제가 직접 착용해보니까 콧볼과 콧대를 일정한 압력을 주더라구요.. 네이버 블로그 기타제품 107개의 글 목록열기..

청모 意味

노즈잇 나이트라인 내돈내산 콧볼, 콧대 교정기 나는 만족해 네이버 블로그 etc 3,242개의 글 목록열기, 네이버 블로그 뷰티 4,988개의 글 목록열기. 쿠팡이 추천하는 노즈잇라인업 특가를 만나보세요, 댓글 1 아이템 116개의 글 목록열기, Com › zorostrin54416 › 224010206316셀프 코 교정기 노즈잇 후기 내돈내산 네이버 블로그.

Com › bbbb1201 › 224021854491노즈잇 콧볼과 콧대 코교정기 내돈내산 네이버 블로그.. 노즈잇 한 번쯤은 진짜 시도해볼만한템.. 노즈잇 한 번쯤은 진짜 시도해볼만한템.. Url 복사 이웃추가 노즈잇 내돈내산 콧대높이기, 복코교정기 사용해본 솔직후기 요즘들어 코라인이 넘 신경 쓰이더라구요ㅠㅠ 콧대는 낮고 콧볼은 살짝 넓은 편이라, 자연스럽게 잡아주는 코교정기를 찾아보다가 요즘 핫한 노즈잇 심플 핏 콧대・콧볼 교정기..

청산 유수현 구독 디시

왓츠인마이블로그 2025블로그챌린지 노즈잇 노즈잇후기 코골이 코골이방지 내돈내산 코관리 수면질 콧볼교정 코막힘 수면 숙면 수면생활 코건강 코골이완화 코골이제품 코골이치료 자연스러운착용 편안한수면 실사용후기 리얼리뷰 생활제품. 오늘 이 후기가 노즈잇 내돈내산을 고민하시는 분들께 도움이 되었으면 좋겠습니다. Com › bbbb1201 › 224021854491노즈잇 콧볼과 콧대 코교정기 내돈내산 네이버 블로그. 간편하게 착, 하루 30분 착용으로 라인업 퍼지고 눌린 라인 고민을 위한 정교한 설계 나에게 맞는 강도로 설정하여 사용하는 라인업.

Monchouchou 헥헥이 포글 움직이는 노즈워크 장난감 포그리볼헝그리 포글 포글 움직이는 노즈워크 장난감 포그리볼앵그리 포글 래핑찰리 노즈워크 장난감 노래방토이, 지금 할인중인 다른 노즈워크iq 장난감 제품도 바로 쿠팡에서 확인할 수, 지피포우즈 스마티포우즈 노즈워크 돌려돌려 돌림판 강아지장난감 대형견.

최홍자 근황

제가 직접 착용해보니까 콧볼과 콧대를 일정한 압력을 주더라구요. Com › bbbb1201 › 224021854491노즈잇 콧볼과 콧대 코교정기 내돈내산 네이버 블로그. 세계에서 가장 유명한 원숭이 캐릭터로 꼽힌다. 작지만 세심한 디테일, 당신을 위한 노즈 잇, 핸디맨미니롱노즈 플라이어 m820318, 노즈잇 노즈잇내돈 노즈잇내돈내산 코교정기 복코교정기 콧볼교정기 콧볼축소기 콧대교정기 콧대높이기 코라인교정 내돈내산 댓글 1 인쇄.

쵸단 제로투 매운맛 서비스 이용약관 작지만 세심한 디테일, 당신을 위한 노즈 잇. 코교정기 콧볼교정기 노즈잇 내돈내산 찐 후기. 제가 한동안 계속 하고 다니니까 엄마가 도대체 그게 뭐냐고 물어보셔서 알려드리니 본인도 해보고싶다고 제 코에 올려져있는 교정기를 빼시더니 본인 코에 딱. 코교정기 노즈잇 내돈내산 리얼후기 네이버 블로그 제품패션이너뷰티 2,934개의 글 목록열기. 활동정보 블챌 왓츠인마이블로그 70개의 글 목록열기. 츠유리 카나오 영어로

초코밀크 드에린 쇼핑몰 잇템샵 네일도구 손톱정리 네일케어 네일아트. 잇템샵 뷰랩 라이트글루 2g 네일패디팁 전용글루. 손오공孫悟空은 중국의 고전소설 《서유기》의 주인공인 원숭이 수인이다. 노즈잇 한 번쯤은 진짜 시도해볼만한템. 강아지 사료간식 황태듬뿍 노즈워크 져키 1kg+1kg 쇼핑. 체인소맨 히토미 추천

체인소맨 폰트 핸디맨미니롱노즈 플라이어 m820318. 왔다갔다 수고를 좀 덜고자 구매했네요. 12,000원17%9,900원 혜택정보 보기. 쿠팡에서 유앤펫 강아지 오픈잇 노즈워크 장난감 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요. 작지만 세심한 디테일, 당신을 위한 노즈 잇. 체인 소맨 182화 디시

최솜이 likey 왓츠인마이블로그 2025블로그챌린지 노즈잇 노즈잇후기 코골이 코골이방지 내돈내산 코관리 수면질 콧볼교정 코막힘 수면 숙면 수면생활 코건강 코골이완화 코골이제품 코골이치료 자연스러운착용 편안한수면 실사용후기 리얼리뷰 생활제품. 포우퀘스트 아보카도 흘림방지 노즈워크 오뚝이 장난감. 서비스 이용약관 작지만 세심한 디테일, 당신을 위한 노즈 잇. 노즈잇 나이트라인 내돈내산 콧볼, 콧대 교정기 나는 만족해 네이버 블로그 etc 3,242개의 글 목록열기. 왔다갔다 수고를 좀 덜고자 구매했네요.

최솜이 유료 노즈잇 코 교정기 라인업 & 나이트라인 세트 가격 45000원 노즈잇 코 교정기 라인업, 나이트 판매합니다 미개봉 새상품이고 나이트케어까지 2개 세트. 저는 귀찮아서 매일 착용은 하지 않겠지만 생각날 때마다 착용해 주려고요☺️. 연관검색어 노즈잇 배송비 포함 쿠팡 랭킹순 쿠팡 랭킹순은 판매 실적, 고객 선호도, 상품 경쟁력 및 검색 정확도 등을 종합적으로 고려한 것입니다. 내돈내산 코교정기 노즈잇 사용 후기 안녕하세요 뷰티 인플루언서 로라입니다🩶 평소 살짝 아쉬운 코라인. 5주에서 6주 정도 착용하고 난 후 사진이에요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.