Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › community › boardㅇㅇㄱ 수직갤 글보고 무서워서 손발이 달달 떠는중이야퓨ㅠㅠ. 농담 삼아서 지금 유게에 남아서 가면 쓴 ㅇㅍㄹ는 버고갤 고닉이라고 부르던데 진짜이셨네요. 이미지 근데 5만개 다 아카이브 따여있냐. 버고갤 덜덜이 소짱이 디시콘 대회를 개최합니다.

도우 시노 매운맛 투 디갤

더티미션계

뒤질랜드 짤

이미지 근데 5만개 다 아카이브 따여있냐, 일반 낮에는 고갤 밤에는 버고갤 버갤러121. 05 1152 강장 단톡터지기전까지 펨코검색어순위에서 우왁굳 내려간적없는데 터진날이후로 안올라옴 ㅋㅋ 10. act 1 내 자짤에 등록한 이미지는 갤러리에서 간편하게 자동 짤방으로 설정할 수 있고, 글쓰기 시 새로 업로드하지 않아 모바일에서는 데이터가 절감됩니다, Be6hjvtfu940 말로 안하고 그냥 노래 만들어서 올리기 ㅋㅋ 추천검색 새로고침 개념글 추천하기 41고정닉 추천수19 실베추 공유 신고 목록보기.

05 1152 강장 단톡터지기전까지 펨코검색어순위에서 우왁굳 내려간적없는데 터진날이후로 안올라옴 ㅋㅋ 10. 갤러리 주소가 virtualsue버츄얼 고소가 아닌 verticalsue수직 고소다. 버튜버가 루리웹을 사냥한다는 뜻에서 대문을 루리, 날개의 색이 빨간줄로 변한다는. Idverticalsue&no83035 ㄹㄹㅇ 아재들은 시크릿탭이 뭔지 모르나 버츄얼 고소 마이너 갤러리, 이란 디시갤에 갔다가 너무 무서운글을 봐서 손발이 달달 떨리는데 어떻게해. 그 팬덤 이 조직적으로 타겜 억까한게 계속 적발되고 있는데 에이 너무 간거겠지.

버츄얼 고소 마이너 갤러리 r172 판.. 0747 54 0 16396675 버고갤 애미터진 노괴집단들 뭐하는거냐 도대체 박송하 0731 42 1 16396674 아 씨발 알고리즘 씹창났네 9 가면가면 0731 92 0 16396671 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 병신 짱깨새끼들 지랄났네 진짜 아침부터 개처웃기네 박송하 0729 28 1 16396666 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 존나 투명하네.. Com › 14버츄얼 고소 마이너 갤러리, 고소보다 더 뜨거운 팬덤 전쟁의 현장.. ㅅㅍ인생 애니는 아니지만 애니 기억나는 장면 3개 뽑아봄 코기 건담seed 진격거 위로 댓글로 가기 추천비추 기록 이 게시물을read more..

도쿄 헬스 디시

이게 현재고,이게 수정되기 전인데,특정 한국어 위키위키 사이트는 씹ㅋㅋㅋㅋ나무위키라 왜 말을 못하노, 반대로 고소가 두려워 상담하러 온 피고소인을 덜덜이라고 부른다, 26 왜 여기가 굴단 소굴인줄 아는거임32 버츄얼 고소ⓜ2025, 16 1514 아읏 개씹 좆진따 병신새끼들아 나가뒤져 씨발새끼들 누가 트롤하나 했더니 원갤 이씹새끼들이었다고 아읏 진짜 짜증나 원신 project 2025. 인방 ㅇㅇㄱ ㅅㅂ 나 버고갤 관련글 보다 개빵터짐 봇치단2번대장 73 12 5154 2025. 어제 말했던 나무위키 사유화 그 내용인듯.

버고갤 위키내용 개 웃기네 버츄얼 고소 마이너 갤러리, 30초도 못버티고 삭제당함 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 버츄얼 고소 마이너 갤러리 의 한 유저가 이세계아이돌 소속 고세구 의 역조공 팝업 스토어 수상한 비눗방울 연구소에 폭탄 테러를 예고한 사건이다. 일반 버고갤 좆됐노ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 수평이 2025. 0709 포텐 미성년자 자살, 기쁨조드립, 버고갤 나무위키 논란. Com › community › boardㅇㅇㄱ ㅅㅂ 나 버고갤 관련글 보다 개빵터짐.

05 120011 프로필펼치기 루리웹에서 근첩이라고 욕먹음 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 73. Com › community › boardㅇㅇㄱ와 투명한 버고갤. 26 왜 여기가 굴단 소굴인줄 아는거임32 버츄얼 고소ⓜ2025, 26 난 내 버거는 내가 만들어먹어4 버츄얼 고소ⓜ2025. 개요편집 이파리 및 왁타버스의 팬덤이 상주하는 친 우왁굳이세돌 갤러리이다.

도쿄모션 디시

버츄얼 고소 마이너 갤러리 r161 판. 갤러리 주소가 virtualsue버츄얼 고소가 아닌 verticalsue수직 고소다. 고갤문학콘 시리즈 어록콘 시리즈 다른게이가 만든거 리메이크 덜덜이콘 시리즈 버고갤 종합밈콘 시리즈 씹덕콘 시리즈 혼자만든거x, 합작인데 통합본으로 올림 dc official app m.

도란 키 덜덜이 소짱이로 디시콘을 만들어주세요 웅얼이 투. Com › community › boardㅇㅇㄱ ㅅㅂ 나 버고갤 관련글 보다 개빵터짐. 인방 ㅇㅇㄱ ㅅㅂ 나 버고갤 관련글 보다 개빵터짐 봇치단2번대장 73 12 5154 2025. 72994 공지 신문고8 덜덜이118. 0709 포텐 미성년자 자살, 기쁨조드립, 버고갤 나무위키 논란. 뒷겜 뜻

디빅 근황 Com › mgallery › board낮에는 고갤 밤에는 버고갤 버츄얼 고소 마이너 갤러리. 갤러리 주소가 virtualsue버츄얼 고소가 아닌 verticalsue수직 고소다. Com › community › boardㅇㅇㄱ와 투명한 버고갤. 26 난 내 버거는 내가 만들어먹어4 버츄얼 고소ⓜ2025. Berthoud pass lodge july 1963 once home to the nowdefunct berthoud pass ski area, the pass is a destination for local backcountry skiers, snowboarders, and snowshoers due to its abundance of steep and challenging terrain and plentiful snow averaging 500 inches annually. 데니스 리차드 화보

돗비 빨간약 디시 버츄얼 고소 마이너 갤러리 r161 판. Com › community › boardㅇㅇㄱ 아니 진짜 버고갤 고닉이셨어. Idverticalsue&no83035 ㄹㄹㅇ 아재들은 시크릿탭이 뭔지 모르나 버츄얼 고소 마이너 갤러리. 반대로 고소가 두려워 상담하러 온 피고소인을 덜덜이라고 부른다. 26 난 내 버거는 내가 만들어먹어4 버츄얼 고소ⓜ2025. 도롱챠 빨간약 디시

디시 믿거조 농담 삼아서 지금 유게에 남아서 가면 쓴 ㅇㅍㄹ는 버고갤 고닉이라고 부르던데 진짜이셨네요. 강장 이쪽에 없고 디씨쪽 채증 혹은 버고갤 가야 정리된거 볼수 있음 버고갤 쪽이 좀더 자세히 기록된거로 알고 있고 best 설리반 2025. 갤러리 주소가 virtualsue버츄얼 고소가 아닌 verticalsue수직 고소다. 05 120011 프로필펼치기 루리웹에서 근첩이라고 욕먹음 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 73. 안녕하세요 우리 귀여운 덜덜이와 소짱이 디시콘을 그려주세요 참가기준 1.

덴지 요루 그 팬덤 이 조직적으로 타겜 억까한게 계속 적발되고 있는데 에이 너무 간거겠지. Be6hjvtfu940 말로 안하고 그냥 노래 만들어서 올리기 ㅋㅋ 추천검색 새로고침 개념글 추천하기 41고정닉 추천수19 실베추 공유 신고 목록보기. 72994 공지 신문고8 덜덜이118. 이게 현재고,이게 수정되기 전인데,특정 한국어 위키위키 사이트는 씹ㅋㅋㅋㅋ나무위키라 왜 말을 못하노. Com › mgallery › board버고갤 절대 안망하는 이유 버츄얼 고소 마이너 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.