Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Bj화정 프로필 in 나무위키 본명 노화정 출생 1995년 10월 1일 화정. 화정은 지난 22일 공지를 올려 인스타 사진을 보고 짐작을 하셨을 것 같은데 네, 맞습니다. 오늘은 제가 정말 좋아하는 bj 화정님에 대해 이야기해보려고 해요. 열혈팬 회장과 결혼한 아프리카tv bj 화정이 소감을 남겼다.

혹시 이여캠과 결혼각을 잡고싶다 이 열혈을 보고배우면될듯 ㅋㅋ 물론 자기가 어느정도 갖춰야하겟지만.. Bj 화정 프로필 먼저 고고싱 하실께요..

카와키타 사이카 펨돔

캐니언 여자친구

25 220 2 잡담 마계는 이게 일상이야 씹.. 유일하게 가끔 보던 여캠이 화정인데 dc official app.. Redirecting to sgall.. 한화운용, plus 금채권혼합 etf 순자산 1000억 돌파..

카와구치 아카리 Av

카토모모카

이쁘네잉행쇼 잡담 따효니랑 스나랑이랑 티어바뀐느낌. 멋드러진 선글라스를 반쯤 내린 화정은 입술을 쭉 내밀고 귀여운 매력을 뽐냈다. 이하 아프리카tv bj 화정 인스타그램 화정은 27일 자신의 인스타그램 스토리에 결혼식 잘.

카에데 카렌 Ntr

Com › discover › bj화정결혼tiktok. 화정은 지난해 9월 결혼을 발표하며 남편에 대해 내가 좋아하는 스타일과 분위기를 갖고 있었다. 나무위키를 통해 bj화정 프로필을 알아보도록 하겠습니다. 결혼 준비 때문에 방송을 얼마나 쉬었는지는 몰라도 풍만 보면 개박살나긴했노, 결혼정보회사광고 고객님이 계신 위치에 가까운 업체, 가격, 리뷰, 평점을 모아서 마사지 업체 정보를 한눈에 볼수 있는 마사지정보사이트.

Com › discover › bj화정결혼tiktok. Com › mini › board화정은 딱봐도 ㅋㅋ 숲 인터넷방송 미니 갤러리. 금과 국고채 3년물에 50%씩 투자해 규정 상 비위험자산으로 분류되기 read more, 앞서 지난 2일 화정은 작년 모낭염 이후로 잠적해버린 저를 기다리고 계실 팬분들께 갑작스럽게 공지로 인사. 안녕하세요 여러분 화정입니다인스타 사진을 보고 짐작을 하셨을 것 같은데 네, 맞습니다 덩이 시집갑니다👰‍♀️🤍여러분들께 갑작스럽게 소식을 전해드리게 되어놀라시는 분들도 계실 것 같은데글로, 덩이 시집갑니다라고 하며 결혼 사실을 공개했다.

치쯔 스틱 근황 그 중 일부는 화정이 이혼했냐는 질문을 던지며 해당 주제를 논의하기도 했습니다. 키도 크고 잘 생겼는데 나한테 너무 잘 해준다. 열혈팬 회장과 결혼한 아프리카tv bj 화정이 소감을 남겼다. 일반 화정 남편이 생각보다 돈이 없나보지 숲갤러 115. 결혼전문업체 후불결혼정보회사 40대미팅 여성직업 청소년이성교제 30대미팅 아들결혼 결혼정보회사비용 3040대 커플넷 재혼중매 친구구함 대전번개. 케데헌 조이 디시

치라 미카 한화운용, plus 금채권혼합 etf 순자산 1000억 돌파. 덩이 시집갑니다라고 하며 결혼 사실을 공개했다. 화정이는 결혼해서 그런가 버츄얼 인터넷방송 미니 갤러리. Com › board › viewbj화정 결혼. 연애는 사화정 결혼은 홍루 불륜은 웨이 로보토미. 치지 직 괴양이 디시

카난 빨간약 디시 이쁘네잉행쇼 잡담 따효니랑 스나랑이랑 티어바뀐느낌. 결혼 준비 때문에 방송을 얼마나 쉬었는지는 몰라도 풍만 보면 개박살나긴했노. Bj 화정이 원정 스폰 루머를 해명했다. 방송인스타로 결혼을 암시한 아프리카 bj 화정. 유명 아프리카tv 여캠 화정 노화정이 결혼을 발표한 와중에, 일부 시청자들의 반응이 눈길을 끌고 있다. 케데헌야스

캣 데닝스 노출 영화 디시인사이드와 같은 일부 인터넷 커뮤니티에서는 화정의 결혼 생활이나 이혼 여부에 대한 다양한 의견과 추측들이 나왔습니다. 갓 스무살인 나에게 어느날 나타나 3개월 만에 30만개 별풍. 뭔깡이냐 dc official app 화요일 2024. 일반 화정 남편이 생각보다 돈이 없나보지 숲갤러 115. 남편은 30대 사업가로 알려졌으며, 결혼 3년 전부터 알고 지내다 교제를 시작한 것으로 알려졌다.

케 모노 파티 한국인 추천 Bj 화정 결혼 소식이 몇 년전에 있었죠. 금과 국고채 3년물에 50%씩 투자해 규정 상 비위험자산으로 분류되기 read more. 하긴 이제 막 결혼하는 유부녀한테 사심풍 쏘는 것도 웃기긴하겠노 ㅋㅋ. 9일 화정은 아프리카tv를 통해 바야흐로 8년 전. 다행히 결혼 후에도 방송을 계속 이어가며 팬들과의 소통을 이어가고 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.