Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

바클 하니 2001년 초1떄 햇던거 생각나네 5 메이플나워 2024. 분점은 본점에 비해 대기시간이 짧다 니본바시 본점은 대기시간이 너무 길다카이센동海鮮丼해산물덮밥이 유명한츠지한이지만. 넥슨코리아 바람의나라 홈페이지 pm 091446 갑빠@유리 바람의나라를 왜 어떻게 이런 으로 만들어놨음. 템 파밍이랑 보스레이드를 왜 이렇게 같이 만들어놨음.

카토 성우

이 공략의 핵심은 캐시샵 9900 연마석을 아끼기 위한 공략이다.. 거기에 클레릭처럼 최소한의 자생가능할 read more.. 치장에 눈길이 벌써 가는데 큰일이네 힘들게 돈 모아서 템부터 맞춰야하는데..

치지 직 맹숙 얼굴

캣 데닝스 더블d

대부분 쌀먹 생각하면서 도사 키우기 시작할텐데메렌의 클레릭과 다르게바람의 나라 도사는 순수 피지컬케릭임, 대부분 쌀먹 생각하면서 도사 키우기 시작할텐데메렌의 클레릭과 다르게바람의 나라 도사는 순수 피지컬케릭임, 추천 2 1 이미지채굴 적용되는 경치 물약 질문이요 질문 본갤러 211.

케이 섹스

02 1427 현재 디시 바클갤 상황. Idbaram0079 바람의나라 본바 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드커뮤니티. 바클 하니 2001년 초1떄 햇던거 생각나네 5 메이플나워 2024, 그 당시 열심히 즐겼던 유저들이 클래식 바람의나라를.

본바 바연 동접자 누가많음 둘중 하나 하고싶은데 사람많은겜 하고싶다. 일반 밸런스 운운할거면 본바 가면됨 바갤러223. 일반인이여두 상황 힘들면 화류쪽 생각. 이 공략의 핵심은 캐시샵 9900 연마석을 아끼기 위한 공략이다. 솔직히 신규유저 공급 확 줄어들거고 클바가 핫해질수록 본바 유저 이탈수는 더 늘어날거임.

카리나 따먹기

주술 무난무난, 초보자들 많음 솬빵 상습범이면서 잘당함도사 인원적음+힐러. 그래서이것저것 알아본바 다리펴고 ㄸ치는게 ㅈㄴ안좋대실제 ㅅㅅ자세는 죄다, 고정 도사 있거나 컨이나 접률 좋아서 도사들 이쁨받을 수 있는 사람들에게 추천장점 재밌다, 억경 오르는게 제일 빠르다도적, 떱헬주술과 비교단점 컨이 어렵다, 도사없으면 아무런 가치가 없다투명, 비영승보 등 극한의 유틸리티, 25 pm 091446 갑빠@유리 바람의나라를 왜 어떻게 이런 으로.

캠퍼스 라이브 방귀 이해인, 노출 피아노로 141만 유튜버 등극. 템 파밍이랑 보스레이드를 왜 이렇게 같이 만들어놨음. 실베 개념 디시미디어 디시이슈 다음 검색 제공. 내실 다 챙기고 환수 신수 돋각인에 힘좀 주면됨 연마가 젤 쉽긴하고 용망토 60찍고 무기 일본9성바꾸고 80연마 찍고 내공올신화 하고 신강풀강하면 read more. Com › mini › board커뮤니티는 절대 포기하면 안된다고 생각합니다 바람의나라 본바. 카리나 나체

케데헌 야스 패자 vs 용 바람의나라본바 미니 갤러리. 바람의나라 클래식 마이너 갤러리 안나옴. Com › 8156588266다른 옛바갤들 눈팅해본거 요약 바람의나라 에펨코리아. 일반인이여두 상황 힘들면 화류쪽 생각. 패자 vs 용 바람의나라본바 미니 갤러리. 케모노 주소

카와기타 사이카 야동 물론 클바 운영 개판나면 달라지겠지만. 본바 바연 동접자 누가많음 둘중 하나 하고싶은데 사람많은겜 하고싶다. 자유 이미지 동영상 지식인 건의 노하우 팬사이트 바람의상실 202601. 24 2055 2년뒤 마비노기는 진짜 디알,드래곤네스트, 바람의나라 만큼 사람찾기도 힘든겜이 되있을거 같음 게임불타도 렉카해주는 유튜브도 없을듯 마비노기 류트 갤러리 2026. 본바 바연 동접자 누가많음 둘중 하나 하고싶은데 사람많은겜 하고싶다. 치지직 맹숙 얼굴

케인 광운대 컴퓨터공학 성별을 선택하는 데 있어 다양한 방법이 있지만, 오늘은 과학적 근거 와 실용적인 팁 을. 클래식 마이너 갤러리는 바람의나라 클래식 마이너 서버의 공식 커뮤니티 사이트입니다. 주술 무난무난, 초보자들 많음 솬빵 상습범이면서 잘당함도사 인원적음+힐러. 넥슨코리아 바람의나라 홈페이지 pm 091446 갑빠@유리 바람의나라를 왜 어떻게 이런 으로 만들어놨음. 게시물82 공개 커뮤니티 갤러리 바람의나라본바 ⬅️.

카난 노출 일반인이여두 상황 힘들면 화류쪽 생각. 실베 개념 디시미디어 디시이슈 다음 검색 제공. 바람의나라 클래식 마이너 갤러리 안나옴. 6 공지 갱신 차단목록 리뉴얼 및 안내5 ㅇㅇ 25. 대부분이 공격 선딜레이, 이동 속도가 느리고 쿨타임이 긴 편이며 생산 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.