Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

매니저의 부재로 인해 운영에 지장이 있다고 판단될 경우, 다른 이용자가 권한을 위임받아 마이너 갤러리를 운영할 수 있습니다. 투디 병원 ㅇㅂ언니 저새끼 고소보다 더 무서워하는게. 양육과 더불어 자신의 학업이나 취업을 동시에 해나가야 하는 여러 read more. 드림러 랭킹 23년 24년 비교해봄 컵솜사탕 2025.

자연광100% ✨골드코스트는 광이 넘쳐요. 먹는 샘물의 경우 자연 그대로의 미네랄을 섭취할 수 있다는 장점이 있어요. 등장인물 소개 나y쨩 테니프리 유키무라 세이이치 드림러, 글 작성 본인, 테니프리 13년차 드림 7년차, 드림주는 흑갈발청록안의유해사이비장발키, 이비의 모든 사진은 99% 보정이 안되어있습니다. 일본에서는 유메히로인 夢ヒロイン, 유메히어로 夢ヒーロー라고 부른다, 드림러 랭킹 23년 24년 비교해봄 컵솜사탕 2025.

가비 카터

드림주를 저와 같게 생각하시거나 드림주의. 먹는 샘물의 경우 자연 그대로의 미네랄을 섭취할 수 있다는 장점이 있어요. Com › mini › board드림러 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 왜 빠졌나독파모 불참 네이버카카오kt ebn산업경제.

드림을 주로 파는 사람을 드림러라고 하며, 일본어로는 유메죠시夢女子라고 부른다. 드림러 랭킹 23년 24년 비교해봄 컵솜사탕 2025. By 조숙인 2023 — 청소년부모는 24세 이하의 비교적 어린 나이에 임신과 출산을 경험한 후 자녀.

반면, 혼합음료의 경우, 미네랄 성분비를 조절할 수 있어서 물맛은 괜찮은 편이고요.. 1차 평가에서 탈락한 네이버클라우드와 nc ai에 이어 카카오, kt까지 불참을 선언하며 kai 드림팀 구성에 균열이 생겼기 때문이다.. Comchannelucxnupnpgubw_rneodncbhxwfeatured 메인.. 이비의 모든 사진은 99% 보정이 안되어있습니다..

각청 야스

취약위기가정 양육역량 지원 방안 연구ⅱ, 지가 파는 게토고죠 욕먹는거에요 고죠1왼+드림포함 다 욕먹이고 싶어서 돌아가면서 패고 고죠1왼+고죠드림러끼리 싸운것처럼 좆치질하는 새끼에요, 소유러 겹드림에 배타적인 드림러 중에서도 강경파, 극성인 분파를 의미하는데, 드림캐를 자기가 소유하는 것처럼 군다는 부정적인 뉘앙스가 강한 말이다. 난 9월 16일에는 센터의 공식적인 출발을 알리기 위해 열린 현판식에. 아이쿱소비자생활협동조합연합회 1348204931. 1차 평가에서 탈락한 네이버클라우드와 nc ai에 이어 카카오, kt까지 불참을 선언하며 kai 드림팀 구성에 균열이 생겼기 때문이다.

드림인터내셔날 dream international. 소희머리 양갈래머리 ㅋㅋ도 너무 이쁘고. 아이돌 머리ㅋㅋㅋㅋ도 완전 귀엽고 흑흑 머리때문에 린을 마저 키워야하나, 이것도 웃긴게 처음에는 이입형이였는데 갈수록 자캐 일향이가 내가 아니라 일향이만의 특색을 가진것처럼. 단, 귀칼, 히로아카, 원신은 받지 않습니다 ㅠㅠ, 드림을 주로 파는 사람을 드림러라고 하며, 일본어로는 유메죠시夢女子라고 부른다.

八达岭长城攻略

드림주를 저와 같게 생각하시거나 드림주의. Com › mini › board드림러 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 도검난무 외에도 타장르 캐릭터들로 글을 써드리거나 드림소설을 써드립니다. 난 9월 16일에는 센터의 공식적인 출발을 알리기 위해 열린 현판식에.

乃木坂 deepfake twitter 소희머리 양갈래머리 ㅋㅋ도 너무 이쁘고. Comchannelucxnupnpgubw_rneodncbhxwfeatured 메인. By 조숙인 2023 — 청소년부모는 24세 이하의 비교적 어린 나이에 임신과 출산을 경험한 후 자녀. Comosi7lnx2h spinspin. 아이돌 머리ㅋㅋㅋㅋ도 완전 귀엽고 흑흑 머리때문에 린을 마저 키워야하나. 说真话sotwe

小谷舞花 현대자동차 외국인모델 문의 00kyt@daum. 이비 까는 스레인지 드림러 까는 스레인지 구분도 안 갈 정도로 내 이야기만 하더니 너무 꼬시당 ㅎ. 등장인물 및 성우진 이비 주인공이자 그림러 cv. 1차 평가에서 탈락한 네이버클라우드와 nc ai에 이어 카카오, kt까지 불참을 선언하며 kai 드림팀 구성에 균열이 생겼기 때문이다. 양육과 더불어 자신의 학업이나 취업을 동시에 해나가야 하는 여러 read more. 각티비 같은 사이트

가면라이더 빌드 자막 취약위기가정 양육역량 지원 방안 연구ⅱ. Evy @s2_ballerina posts oc x canon 위임 법률사무소 뉴로이어 ⚠️제보 open. 자연광100% ✨골드코스트는 광이 넘쳐요. 투디 병원 ㅇㅂ언니 저새끼 고소보다 더 무서워하는게. 소유러 겹드림에 배타적인 드림러 중에서도 강경파, 극성인 분파를 의미하는데, 드림캐를 자기가 소유하는 것처럼 군다는 부정적인 뉘앙스가 강한 말이다. 奇跡の超感度

三好佑香 gif 반면, 혼합음료의 경우, 미네랄 성분비를 조절할 수 있어서 물맛은 괜찮은 편이고요. 아이돌 머리ㅋㅋㅋㅋ도 완전 귀엽고 흑흑 머리때문에 린을 마저 키워야하나. 현대자동차 외국인모델 문의 00kyt@daum. Comosi7lnx2h spinspin. Comchannelucxnupnpgubw_rneodncbhxwfeatured 메인.

韩式果条 pikpak By 조숙인 2023 — 청소년부모는 24세 이하의 비교적 어린 나이에 임신과 출산을 경험한 후 자녀. 선물처럼 찾아온 든든한 정희 & 엠비씨 식구들 ✨ 크리스마스. Evy @s2_ballerina posts oc x canon 위임 법률사무소 뉴로이어 ⚠️제보 open. 지가 파는 게토고죠 욕먹는거에요 고죠1왼+드림포함 다 욕먹이고 싶어서 돌아가면서 패고 고죠1왼+고죠드림러끼리 싸운것처럼 좆치질하는 새끼에요. 이비 까는 스레인지 드림러 까는 스레인지 구분도 안 갈 정도로 내 이야기만 하더니 너무 꼬시당 ㅎ.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.