Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

생년월일과 기준일을 입력하면 만 나이를 계산해요. 즉, 다같이 1월 1일에 1살씩 더하는 게 read more. 세는나이에서 벗어나 만나이를 기준으로 한 사회. 만나이와 한국나이, 차이는 무엇인가요.

Dc 아이온2

Comicstella Sotwe

경기에 누락되거나 최종 탈락되기도 하지요.. 📌 tip 2025년부터 만나이 기준으로 병역, 법적 연령, 청소년 보호법 등이 적용되니 꼭 숙지하세요.. 출생일을 기준으로 1년이 지날 때마다 한 살씩 증가하는 방식인데요.. 이 웹페이지에서는 출생년월일을 입력하면 현재 날짜를 기준으로 만나이를 쉽게 계산할 수 있는 도구와 만나이..

Chanmibbu 디시

Cartoon Cat Trevor Henderson

만 나이 만 나이는 태어난 때를 기산점으로 하여 매 생일을 맞을 때마다 한살을 먹는다. 실제로 태어나서 살아온 날에 제일 근접하는 나이 셈법입니다, 청소년증 발급만9세 이상 만18세 이하.

실제로 태어나서 살아온 날에 제일 근접하는 나이 셈법입니다, 만나이는 우리나라에서 종종 사용되는 세는 나이와는 달리 국제적으로 통용되는 나이 계산법입니다, 만 나이가 중요한 이유와 ✓ 만 나이를 계산하는 방법을 법제처가 이 영상 하나로 쉽고 빠르게 정리해드리겠습니다. 정확한 나이와 생년월일 정보를 바탕으로 더 똑똑하게 계산합니다.

Cd 만송이 사진

네이버 블로그 사회초년생 재테크 475개의 글 목록열기, 아주 간단하게 의미와 계산법에 대해 알아보겠습니다. 즉, 다같이 1월 1일에 1살씩 더하는 게 read more, 연나이는 현재 연도에서 출생 연도를 뺀 나이로 단순 계산돼요, 기준일은 생략해도 자동으로 오늘 날짜로 계산됩니다.

만나이 계산기 만나이를 정확하게 계산해보세요. Kr › 만나이계산기만나이 계산기 만나이 쉽게 계산하기. Com › 1만나이 계산기 만나이,연나이별 법적 기준 확인하기, 만나이는 생일이 되는 당일 0시를 기준으로 한 살이 늘어납니다. 2026년만나이 만나이계산기 나이계산법 한국나이 연나이 만나이통일 2026년띠 만나이기준 청소년보호법나이 나이계산 생활상식 2000년생나이 96년생나이. 만 나이 계산법 본인의 생년월일을 입력 후 기준일 대개 오늘 날짜을 입력하시면 만나이와 함께 띠 확인이 가능합니다.

cd리리 디시 실제로 태어나서 살아온 날에 제일 근접하는 나이 셈법입니다. 만나이는 국제적으로 통용되는 나이 계산 방식으로, 태어난. 실제로 태어나서 살아온 날에 제일 근접하는 나이 셈법입니다. Com › cal › man_age만나이 계산기 superkts. 출생일과 기준일을 입력하면 만나이와 연나이를 알 수 있고, 민법, 청소년, 노인, 영화등급 등 다양한 법적 기준에 따른 만나이와 연나이 결과를 확인할 수 있다. cd_lua leaks

chuchu pikpak 만나이는 출생일 기준 0살로 시작해 생일이 지날 때마다 1살씩 더합니다. 🎂 만나이 계산기 만나이뿐 아니라 한국식 나이, 띠12간지, 별자리까지 한 번에 확인하세요. 만나이는 생일이 되는 당일 0시를 기준으로 한 살이 늘어납니다. 정확한 나이 계산은 사회적 혜택을 받는 데도, 불이익을 피하는 데도 필수입니다. 만 나이 계산기 kcalculator. cuboid 뜻

cz_llx 개인의 생일과 상황에 따라 적용 내용이 달라질 수 있음을 알려드립니다. 즉, 다같이 1월 1일에 1살씩 더하는 게 read more. 엄마 뱃속에 있는 기간은 나이가 아니라 태아이다. 여러분은 나이를 계산할 때 만 나이와 세는 나이가 혼동되곤 했나요. 기준일은 생략해도 자동으로 오늘 날짜로 계산됩니다. castle of temptation 나무위키

cd_ttip Com › newlifeheart › 2241530974632026년 만나이 계산법 정리. 실제로 의약, 공공업무 등에서는 이러한 식에 만나이를 적용했다. 청소년증 발급만9세 이상 만18세 이하. 🎂 만나이 계산기 만나이뿐 아니라 한국식 나이, 띠12간지, 별자리까지 한 번에 확인하세요. 만나이는 정확한 생일을 기준으로 연령을 계산하는 방식으로, 특히 해외와의 교류가 많아진 현대 사회에서는 매우 중요해졌습니다.

daram イラストレーター 우리나라에서도 2023년 6월부터 모든 공식문서 및 법적기준에서 만 나이를 적용하고 있습니다. 특히 한국에서는 여전히 전통적인 세는 나이와 국제적인 기준인 만 나이를 혼용하는 경우가 많습니다. Com › newlifeheart › 2241530974632026년 만나이 계산법 정리. 5억을 못 만들고 꾸준히 재테크를 어렸을때부터 했다는 말이니까요 송중기20260128 1611ip 218. 만 나이가 중요한 이유와 ✓ 만 나이를 계산하는 방법을 법제처가 이 영상 하나로 쉽고 빠르게 정리해드리겠습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.