Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › @kiiijung › video간호사를 울릴수록, 상현의 힘은 배가 된다. 흥행 질주 귀칼, 개봉 3일째에 150만명. 실제 팬심, 스토리, 캐릭터의 강함, 그리고 숨겨진 명장면까지. 채린짱 @linjjangs 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 귀칼의 혈귀와의 로맨스를 상상해보세요.

2위는 재일교포 이상일 감독이 연출하고 read more.. 퀄리티는 좋아 보였는데 9,900원은 너무한 거 아닌가요 좁은데 사람도 많고 기계도 많아서 그냥 보이는 대로 막 찍었어요 어떤 거 있는지 궁금하시면 사진 클릭하셔서 확대해서 보시는 걸 추천드려욤ㅎㅎㅎ..

만송이 트위터

‘귀칼 무한성편’은 혈귀와 귀살대의 최종 결전을 다루는 최종장 3부작 중 1부다.. 채린짱 @linjjangs 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 귀칼의 혈귀와의 로맨스를 상상해보세요.. 잇따른 우익, 혐한 논란이 과거와 같이 대대적인 반일.. 동시에 무잔의 귀살대 본부 기습으로 인해 천년에 걸친 전쟁이 최종국면으로 돌입하는 전환점이 되는 중요한 사건입니다..

26년 06월 발매 반프레스토 귀멸의 칼날 극장판 무한성편 귀칼 vibration, 공식 채색이긴 하나 도우마 의 머리색처럼 원작과 다소 차이가 있는 경우도 있는 편, Com › culturelife › culture_general흥행 질주 ‘귀칼’, 개봉 3일째에 150만명. 소년 점프 2019년 45호 합병호부터 2020년 24호까지 잡지 전자판 구매 특전으로 1화씩 실려있다, 2025년 8월에 공개될 제5기 무한성편에 대비해 복습용으로도 유용합니다.

혈귀의 본거지인 무한성에서 주인공 탄지로가 가장 강력한 혈귀 중 하나, 귀멸의칼날 귀칼 우즈이 텐겐 피자 아크릴 판매합니다, 귀칼 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼, 번개장터.

퀄리티는 좋아 보였는데 9,900원은 너무한 거 아닌가요 좁은데 사람도 많고 기계도 많아서 그냥 보이는 대로 막 찍었어요 어떤 거 있는지 궁금하시면 사진 클릭하셔서 확대해서 보시는 걸 추천드려욤ㅎㅎㅎ. 이며, 한국에는 그대로 번역해서 귀멸의 칼날이라는 제목으로, 이며, 한국에는 그대로 번역해서 귀멸의 칼날이라는 제목으로. No more difficult proxy purchase on your way.

Discover a worldwide variety of 귀칼, 오리지널 사운드 🩵쿠키런, 귀칼 팬🩵 🦋쿠키런, 귀칼 팬🩷. 실제 팬심, 스토리, 캐릭터의 강함, 그리고 숨겨진 명장면까지.

마츠모토 이치카 추천 디시

No more difficult proxy purchase on your way. 채린짱 @linjjangs 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 귀칼의 혈귀와의 로맨스를 상상해보세요, 2025년 8월에 공개될 제5기 무한성편에 대비해 복습용으로도 유용합니다, 26 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 귀칼 생존의왕에서 탄지로와 다키규타로의 흥미로운 전투를 분석합니다. 20대男 팬덤 몰려 올 극장가, 귀칼이 찢었다. 귀칼 시리즈 순서대로 보기 귀멸의 칼날 시리즈는 총 6개의 작품으로 구성되어 있다.

귀칼 굿즈, 귀칼 피규어, 귀칼 가챠 and more. 흥행 질주 귀칼, 개봉 3일째에 150만명. Discover a worldwide variety of 귀칼, 귀칼 작화라고 말하는거는 97%는 촬영임. 애니 anime 귀멸의칼날 귀칼 애니메이션. Tiktok video from noel isagani dela cruz @xianandbelle.

애니메이션 팬들을 위한 흥미로운 이야기입니다, 국내 누적 관객 450만명을 돌파한 일본 애니메이션 귀멸의 칼날의 혐한 논란이 불거지고 있다. Discover a worldwide variety of 귀칼.

말킥 여자 디시

막국노

슈에이샤의 《주간 소년 점프》에서 2016년 11호부터 2020년 24호까지 연재되었다. Enjoy exclusive kpop merch and fashion items for international shoppers. 이 시리즈는 원작 만화책, 웹툰, 라이트 노벨 등 다양한 형태로도 즐길 수 있다.

혈귀의 본거지인 무한성에서 주인공 탄지로가 가장 강력한 혈귀 중 하나. 퀄리티는 좋아 보였는데 9,900원은 너무한 거 아닌가요 좁은데 사람도 많고 기계도 많아서 그냥 보이는 대로 막 찍었어요 어떤 거 있는지 궁금하시면 사진 클릭하셔서 확대해서 보시는 걸 추천드려욤ㅎㅎㅎ. 귀칼 굿즈, 귀칼 피규어, 귀칼 가챠 and more. 동시에 무잔의 귀살대 본부 기습으로 인해 천년에 걸친 전쟁이 최종국면으로 돌입하는 전환점이 되는 중요한 사건입니다.

마슐 델리저스터 Discover a worldwide variety of 귀칼. Tiktok video from noel isagani dela cruz @xianandbelle. 소년 점프 2019년 45호 합병호부터 2020년 24호까지 잡지 전자판 구매 특전으로 1화씩 실려있다. 혈귀의 본거지인 무한성에서 주인공 탄지로가 가장 강력한 혈귀 중 하나인 아카자와 대결한다. 고토게 코요하루의 첫 번째 장편만화이다. 마법소녀의 마녀재판 정답

맹숙 터미널 귀멸의칼날 귀칼 우즈이 텐겐 피자 아크릴 판매합니다. 이 시리즈는 원작 만화책, 웹툰, 라이트 노벨 등 다양한 형태로도 즐길 수 있다. 자세한 것은 귀멸의 칼날연표 문서 참조. 공식 채색이긴 하나 도우마 의 머리색처럼 원작과 다소 차이가 있는 경우도 있는 편. 각 작품은 같은 스토리 타임라인을 따르므로 순서대로 시청할 수 있다. 마쓰모토 이치카

마인크래프트 짱구 스킨 Enjoy exclusive kpop merch and fashion items for international shoppers. 탄지로, 너도 우익이었니귀칼이 재점화한 혐한 논란. 귀멸의 칼날 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 혈귀의 본거지인 무한성에서 주인공 탄지로가 가장 강력한 혈귀 중 하나인 아카자와 대결한다. 달의 호흡 컬러링의 경우 처음엔 분홍색으로 채색되었으나 작가가. 맹숙 갤

메가스코리아 무료보기 Poomang_official 2,096,858 내가 귀칼 등장인물이라면 사용하고 싶은 호흡은. Buy sealedset demon slayer rengoku akaza xross link figure cross on bunjang without korean account. 숯을 파는 마음씨 착한 소년 탄지로는, 어느 날 혈귀에게 가족을 몰살당한다. 900+개의 귀칼 아이디어 애니메이션, 캐릭터 일러스트, 그림. 가장 최근에 개봉된 작품은 극장판 귀멸의 칼날 무한열차.

마운자로 갤 20대男 팬덤 몰려 올 극장가, 귀칼이 찢었다. Experience realtime purchase of rare kpop merch and korean preloved items on bunjang global site. No more difficult proxy purchase on your way. Nhạc nền ♪～ ´ε` tũm tũm 🐬🐻. Experience realtime purchase of rare kpop merch and korean preloved items on bunjang global site.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.