Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Узнайте перевод слова 수서안마 價 『oio 8436 3481』 수서안마스웨디시 세상예쁨 aaa 수서마사지 5210 수서유흥 aaa 수서업소 0. 스웨디시 마사지는ツ 근육의 긴장을 완화하고ツ 혈액 순환을 촉진 read more. 더풋샵 수서역점은 각종 이벤트로 할인 행사를 진행하고 있어서, 근처 사는 분들이나 직장인분들 잘 활용하면 좋을듯. 𝐜𝐨𝐦 l 수서건마 수서안마 ウ 내상.

Q&a 수서안마후기💥💥💥〈 달림가자.. 스웨디시 마사지는ツ 근육의 긴장을 완화하고ツ 혈액 순환을 촉진 read more..

최 솜이 라이 키 후기 디시

천인주박

은은한 조명과 차분한 음악이 흐르는ど 공간에서ど read more, 스웨디시 마사지는ツ 근육의 긴장을 완화하고ツ 혈액 순환을 촉진 read more. 각기 다른 매력을 가진 이곳들에서 특별한 휴식을 경험해.

수서역마사지 20대,30대 힐링 마사지샵 가볼만한곳 추천 건마시티 카피라이트. 𝐜𝐨𝐦 l 수서건마 수서안마 ウ 내상, 영업시간 오전 10시30분 익일 오전 2시30분 매장 공지사항 라스트 오더는 새벽 1시30분까지입니다. 수도권 전철 3호선 은 심야에 1편성이 주박한다.

수서역 水西驛, suseo station은 대한민국 서울특별시 강남구 수서동 에 있는 수도권 전철 3호선 과 수도권 전철 수인분당선 의 전철역 이자 환승역이고, 수서평택고속선 수도권 광역급행철도 a노선의 철도역이자 종착역이다. 예약시간 30분전 매장으로 전화하셔서 꼭 예약. 여지껏 태국이나 다른 곳에서 아로마마사지 받을 때 일회용 팬티만 주고 상의는 아무것도 입지 않았었는데 란테라피에서는 일회용 브라도 제공되더라구요.

최솜이 실물

3월에는 35만 원 정액권, 55만 원 정액권을 1820% 할인해 준다.. 수서역에 위치한 가장 저렴하고 인기있는 한국, 러시아, 일본 다양한 국적의 홈케어 홈타이를 위치, 가격, 인지도 부분을 모두 비교 분석하여 소비자에게 가장 합리적이고 정확한 수서역주변 출장샵을 찾을 수 있도록 도와.. 안마의자는 저 2개가 다이고, 저녁에는 공용홀 전체에 저 매트를 깔아주더라고요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그럼 각자 자리잡고 누워서 자요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 진짜 동네 사랑방 같이 친근한 느낌이었어요 ㅋㅋㅋ 스포츠 마사지 실이 따로 있고..

평일 이벤트로 오전 10시 30분 부터 오후 4시까지 80분 이상 코스는 10% 할인. Com 〉손흥민 추천 업소수서안마후기◇수서술집후기く예약 많은 인기 매니저 체크 안마 예약라인 mk388 민락동일본인출장. 게다가 일회용 속옷도 저렴한 메이드인차이나가 아닌 메이드 인 태국, Com › view › armaanhill56수서역안마 no, 수서역 근처 마사지 더스킨 플로리아 문정역 망고테라피 가락시장역 벨라스웨디시 가락시장역 세인트 가락시장역 허니스웨디시 가락시장역 에비뉴.

츄 꼭지

Узнайте перевод слова 수서안마 價 『oio 8436 3481』 수서안마스웨디시 세상예쁨 aaa 수서마사지 5210 수서유흥 aaa 수서업소 0. 기존가130,000원 할인가 31% 90,000원, 053283257 수서역안마 수서동안마. Com › today › seoul수서역24시마사지, 24시간 운영하는 마사지샵 인기 순위 vip인포.

최애의 아이히토미 기존가130,000원 할인가 31% 90,000원. 수서역출장마사지 수서역출장안마를 찾으신다면 vip인포에서 찾으세요. 영업시간 오전 10시30분 익일 오전 2시30분 매장 공지사항 라스트 오더는 새벽 1시30분까지입니다. 안마의자는 저 2개가 다이고, 저녁에는 공용홀 전체에 저 매트를 깔아주더라고요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그럼 각자 자리잡고 누워서 자요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 진짜 동네 사랑방 같이 친근한 느낌이었어요 ㅋㅋㅋ 스포츠 마사지 실이 따로 있고. 평일 이벤트로 오전 10시 30분 부터 오후 4시까지 80분 이상 코스는 10% 할인. 채령 레전드 디시

최세희 논란 Q&a 일상의 행복을 찾아가는 시간 에라토. 3월에는 35만 원 정액권, 55만 원 정액권을 1820% 할인해 준다. 수도권 전철 3호선 은 심야에 1편성이 주박한다. 가격표 입니다 회원가로 20% 할인된 가격은 꼭 회원으로 가입하지 않아도 현금결제시 적용금액이라고 해요 계좌이체도 가능하답니다 제가 즐겨받는건 60분 타이마사지에요 아로마 마사지도 받아봤는데, 미끄덩 오일로 문지르는 느낌보다는 강하게 꾹꾹 눌리고 늘려주는 타이마사지가 저는 더. 수서역안마 칼럼 마사지 요법이란 무엇인가. 채솔 라이키 라이키

채류진 트젠 디시 안마의자는 저 2개가 다이고, 저녁에는 공용홀 전체에 저 매트를 깔아주더라고요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그럼 각자 자리잡고 누워서 자요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 진짜 동네 사랑방 같이 친근한 느낌이었어요 ㅋㅋㅋ 스포츠 마사지 실이 따로 있고. Com › 254강남구 수서동 마사지 추천 안내 4곳. 수서역안마 칼럼 마사지 요법이란 무엇인가. Str때문에 수서역 찜질방을 이용하시는 분들이 많아졌는데요. 안마의자는 저 2개가 다이고, 저녁에는 공용홀 전체에 저 매트를 깔아주더라고요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그럼 각자 자리잡고 누워서 자요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 진짜 동네 사랑방 같이 친근한 느낌이었어요 ㅋㅋㅋ 스포츠 마사지 실이 따로 있고. 츠야츠야 hitomi

초모 벌칙 야동 90분짜리 전신아로마오일 관리였기에 일회용 속옷으로 갈아입었어요. 영업시간 오전 10시30분 익일 오전 2시30분 매장 공지사항 라스트 오더는 새벽 1시30분까지입니다. 90분짜리 전신아로마오일 관리였기에 일회용 속옷으로 갈아입었어요. 여지껏 태국이나 다른 곳에서 아로마마사지 받을 때 일회용 팬티만 주고 상의는 아무것도 입지 않았었는데 란테라피에서는 일회용 브라도 제공되더라구요. Search results for 수서안마 oio 8436 3481 세상예쁨 클럽이벤트 수서유흥 수서업소 수서역안마 수서동안마 6010 수서안마방 수서안마번호 수서안마위치 수서안마주소 수서안마스웨디시 수서마사지 your search did not turn up any results.

초가스 카운터 디시 기존가130,000원 할인가 31% 90,000원. 바쁜 일상 속에서 잠시나마 피로를 풀고, 심신의 안정을 찾고 싶다면 마사지가 제격이죠. Com 〉손흥민 추천 업소수서안마후기◇수서술집후기く예약 많은 인기 매니저 체크 안마 예약라인 mk388 민락동일본인출장. 은은한 조명과 차분한 음악이 흐르는ど 공간에서ど read more. 수도권 전철 3호선 은 심야에 1편성이 주박한다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.