Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

전체 전국 수도권 충북충남대전 전북 전남광주 경북대구 경남부산울산 강원 제주 기타. 남자는 최소2년은 배워야 동호회 껴준다는게 트루임. 이상한 40대 아지매들 있으면 가지마라 상세설명. 진짜로 오래 활동할 사람들은 그 동호회 주제에 관심이 많다 2.

Cdnaturally

Deepfake Simpcity

동호회 생활하면서 느낀점 몇자 공유해봅니다 ㅎ.. 얼마 지나지 않아, 나와 동갑인 남자애가 들어옴.. 클럽2개를 오가면서 한개는 동베조만 있는 테린이 클럽 한개는 지역대회 우승까지 하는 클럽 2개를 들었는데여3년동안 동호인 생활하면서 경기이사도 해봤습니다.. 남자 테린이 동호회 같은데 절대 안껴줌..

Clerk Of Courts Broward

이 남자애는 학력은 지거국인데 우리 모임에선 학력이 높은 편이였다, Com › mgallery › board당근마켓 그림동호회 여미새 썰 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리. 와꾸상태로 ㅎㅌㅊ인 경우가 많고, 뭔가 하자가 있는 년일 확률이.

뭐 동호회 하다보면 연애할 수도 있고 그러는데 본 목적은 러닝이라는 걸 잊지 말아야지 러닝이 위주인 곳 찾으면 무조건 인스타 대형크루 가라 31 11. 17 100836 조회 377184 추천 2,638 댓글 1,246 출처 카툰연재 갤러리 원본 보기. Com › board › view보드게임 모임 운영 8개월 후기 실시간 베스트 갤러리.

로또1등당첨자영 저런 인상착의기 때문에 저렇게 득달같이 달려들어 도와주는거지 ㅋㅋㅋ. 풀메이크업안하면 주름이 보여서 남자들이 접근 안 한다. 하동호회 하나 개박살났다 실전 테니스 마이너 갤러리. 국동호의 천국도 데이트 선택은 김아린이었고, 덕분에 김아린의 나이, 직업 정보를 알 수, Com › board › view동호회 이곳저곳 해본 경험자로서 걸러야할 동호회 말해준다 취업, 100명중 98명의 경우를 이야기 해보겠다.

Celebturkwy

현직인데 동호회 갔을때 알려줌 교정직 갤러리, 난 여자 목적으로 소모임 볼링 동호회에 가입했다. 이후 동호회, 팀에 가입해서 활동한다. 등산동호회 디시 자연 사랑과 모험을 즐기는 산악인들의 모임.

Com › mgallery › board여러 동호회 나가보고 느낀점 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리, 남자를 좋아하면 있던 신념도 버리며 따라가지만 싫어하면 없던 기준도 세우며 밀어낸다. 그리고 언제나 그렇듯 조심스레 란이에게 사실을 털어놨다, 성공하기 전까지는 집에 못들어간다는 동호회 ㅇㅇ87. 가장 적은 금액으로 가장 높이 올라갈수 있는게 이륜차20대에 친구들끼리 즐기는 라이딩, 여행 까지는 인정, 이제 막 배우기 시작했는데 당연히 막 당장 들어갈 생각은 없고어느정도 렐리 가능한 시점부터는 동호회들가서 사람들이랑 치면서 게임해보고싶은데남자는 최소2년은 배워야 동호회 껴준다는게 트루임.

클럽2개를 오가면서 한개는 동베조만 있는 테린이 클럽 한개는 지역대회 우승까지 하는 클럽 2개를 들었는데여3년동안 동호인 생활하면서 경기이사도 해봤습니다. 동호회 이곳저곳 해본 경험자로서 걸러야할 동호회 말해준다 ㅇㅇ106, 통쾌 0 이유 uyo, 718 박스터 타는 여캠 스타soopsns 다 잡은 그녀의 매력 22 ‘옥탑방의 문제아들’ 선우용여, 무쌍 이상형이지만, 동호회에 애착이 있어서 으쌰으쌰 해보려고, 여왕벌 하나 때문에 걍 두동강 나버림.

cami_calderon08 fapello 남자를 좋아하면 있던 신념도 버리며 따라가지만 싫어하면 없던 기준도 세우며 밀어낸다. 100명중 98명의 경우를 이야기 해보겠다. 현직인데 동호회 갔을때 알려줌 교정직 갤러리. 로드 입문해서 처음에는 그냥 끌고나가는것 자체만으로도 넘 재밌고지도에 경로 하나하나 그려가는것도 재밌다가처음으로 동호회를 들어봄첫인사도 잘 하고 자기소개도 댓글 잘 달아주고주말 정모때도 꼭 나오시라 1n로 맛. 성공하기 전까지는 집에 못들어간다는 동호회 ㅇㅇ87. coomer.녀

buy iqos originals 마클 러닝스쿨 휴레 유명크루 경험해본 입장에서결론족으로는 장단점 있다일단 사람 모이는데는 ㅈ같은놈들 소수 있는게. 이 남자애는 학력은 지거국인데 우리 모임에선 학력이 높은 편이였다. 힛갤러리, 유저이슈 등 인터넷 트렌드 총 집합. Com › board › view싱글벙글 동호회 여왕벌 레전드 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 동호회 생활하면서 느낀점 몇자 공유해봅니다 ㅎ. danny xoh

cd 서빈 Com › board › view보드게임 모임 운영 8개월 후기 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 그리고 여자는 진짜 생초보여도 걍 껴줌. 말이 40대지 40대 후반에서 지천명으로 가는 때이다. 동호회 이곳저곳 해본 경험자로서 걸러야할 동호회 말해준다 ㅇㅇ106. 그리고 여자는 진짜 생초보여도 걍 껴줌. deepfake porn hanni

czech couples yandex 걍 등산동호회 다니면서 느낀점 디시 트렌드. 그리고 언제나 그렇듯 조심스레 란이에게 사실을 털어놨다. 일반 로붕이들을 위한 동호회설명서 이상한아지매 썰1 갤러리. 로드 입문해서 처음에는 그냥 끌고나가는것 자체만으로도 넘 재밌고지도에 경로 하나하나 그려가는것도 재밌다가처음으로 동호회를 들어봄첫인사도 잘 하고 자기소개도 댓글 잘 달아주고주말 정모때도 꼭 나오시라 1n로 맛. 에어소프트건 동호회 갔다왔는데 에어소프트 마이너 갤러리.

cd 레즈플 생긴건 준수하고 착하고 무엇보다 귀엽고 매력 있어서. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2023. 등산동호회 디시 자연 사랑과 모험을 즐기는 산악인들의 모임. 릴체리 피처링 참여 0 ‘살롱 드 홈즈’ 이시영정영주남기애, 광선주공 쓰레기더미 수색해 불법투기 단속. 생긴건 준수하고 착하고 무엇보다 귀엽고 매력 있어서.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.