Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

서귀포 숙소 콤마하우스는 옥상 루프탑도 있다. 제주스파리조트,잭슨 스파욕조,카페,천연비누공방,천연비누,향수만들기,야외풀,바베큐시설. 2인기준 2방인데 저렇게 수건을 많이 주다니 ㅎㅎ 화장실도 꽤 넓다. 이렇게 부산 해운대 광안리 한달살기 오피스텔 보다도 괜찮았던 콤마 여성전용 쉐어하우스 특징들을 써보았습니다.

히툐

히토미 정장

１８３７５８２

Post 사라하우스 사라 commapartyhouse.. 트립어드바이저 쉼표더하기 게스트하우스, 여수 트립어드바이저에서 여수의 44 기타 숙박시설 중 6위에 랭크되고, 5점만점 평가에서 4점을 받은 쉼표더하기 게스트하우스에 관한 9건의 여행자 리뷰, 13건의 사진 및 특가정보를 확인하세요.. T라미슈cake sns에서 핫했던 티라미슈를 칵테일로 재해석했습니다.. 🏷️ 𝑻𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒖𝑪𝒂𝒌𝒆 𝑩𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒌 𝑻𝒐𝒕 𝑹𝒖𝒎, 𝑻𝒊𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒖 𝑷𝒐𝒘𝒅𝒆𝒓, 𝑴𝒂𝒄𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒂 𝑺𝒚𝒓𝒖𝒑, 𝑪𝒐𝒄𝒐𝒂 𝑩𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓..

3가지의 홀이 있지만, 오늘은 그 중에서 코스모스 홀을 소. 사장님도 친절하시고 주변에 1분만 나가면 놀거리도 많아서 사상에서 자면 콤마호텔만 이용할꺼예요. 도깨비 파티하우스, seoul, korea.

사장님도 친절하시고 주변에 1분만 나가면 놀거리도 많아서 사상에서 자면 콤마호텔만 이용할꺼예요. Title쉼의 정석, 성신여대 루프탑 파티룸 콤마 comma에서 생일축하 파티를 했어요 ft, Comcommahouse 사이트 참고해주시기 바랍니다, 마무리 청소해주실분 구해요 콤마파티하우스 화양동, 핫플레이스 콤마하우스 comma house에서 즐거운 여정을 보내세요.

히토미 작가 디시

마무리 청소해주실분 구해요 콤마파티하우스 화양동. 이렇게 부산 해운대 광안리 한달살기 오피스텔 보다도 괜찮았던 콤마 여성전용 쉐어하우스 특징들을 써보았습니다. 소개 생성일 2022년 09월 휴식이 되는 집 콤마하우스 감성 리빙 소품샵 온라인이 주판매처입니다 ssmartstore.

히토미 학교 핫플레이스 콤마하우스 comma house에서 즐거운 여정을 보내세요. 침대다리가 없어서 떨어져서 다칠일이 없습니다 ㅎㅎ 제주도 게스트하우스 콤마하우스 2인실에는 컴퓨터 tv 냉장고 wifi가 비치 되어 있으며 책상 서랍을 여시면 드라이기가 있습니다 제주도 게스트하우스 콤마하우스에는 전객실 개별 욕실로 이루어져 있으며. Lowest price guarateed and local services for vacation rentals in korea. 시급 1만 5000원, 마무리 청소 설겆이 테이블 정리 부탁드립니다 오후 4시전까지 마무리 하시면 됩니다 장기 알바 하실분 구합니다. The best local home sharing service in 콤마파티하우스. 히토미 얀데레 디시

히토미 체인소맨 요루 침대다리가 없어서 떨어져서 다칠일이 없습니다 ㅎㅎ 제주도 게스트하우스 콤마하우스 2인실에는 컴퓨터 tv 냉장고 wifi가 비치 되어 있으며 책상 서랍을 여시면 드라이기가 있습니다 제주도 게스트하우스 콤마하우스에는 전객실 개별 욕실로 이루어져 있으며. 서귀포 숙소 콤마하우스는 옥상 루프탑도 있다. Com › sonafox › 223541725421쉼의 정석, 성신여대 루프탑 파티룸 콤마comma에서 생일축하 파. Book homes in korea from hanok, korea traditional house, to finestay, delux homestay with concierge services wehome. 제주스파리조트,잭슨 스파욕조,카페,천연비누공방,천연비누,향수만들기,야외풀,바베큐시설. 히토미 여동생 임신

히피펌 안경 디시 9km 경기도 부천시 대장로118번길 서래옥설렁탕 0. 12월 한해를 마무리 하기 위해 친구들과 연말파티를 하기로 했어요. The best local home sharing service in 콤마파티하우스. 도깨비 파티하우스, seoul, korea. 자양동 프라이빗 시네마룸 콤마시네마 가격표 입니다. 히토미 협박 태그

히토미노예 기준인원 초과요금 1인 5000원 이불 추가요금 5,000원 무료 조식 서비스 제공 에그샌드위치와 햄 샌드위치 따뜻한 커피를 제공한다. 9km 경기도 부천시 대장로118번길 서래옥설렁탕 0. 콤마에서 즐기는 블랙 앤 화이트 파티에 여러분. 서울 내에 위치한 더콤마에서 머물러보세요. Post 사라하우스 사라 commapartyhouse.

히토미 할아버지 5km 경기도 부천시 성오로124번길 양씨네왕순대. 복층 글램핑 감성,sourcesblog. 시설 안내 1 160인치 스크린, 음향 돌비 디지털 플러스 2 조명하우스 라이트 디밍 자동화 3 쾌적한 실내 화장실 4 편안한 5인용 쇼파, 리클라이너 4인용 쇼파2석 5. 서울특별시 마포구 에 있는 개인주택 입니다. 성신여대 신상 파티룸 콤마 다녀왔어요 성신여대에 파티룸이 이렇게 많다니요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.