Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

몸매 탄탄한 배우 추천좀 스타크래프트. 아주 몸매가 좋은 그런 배우의 작품입니다. 후방주의, 노출, 성인, 스타킹, 코스프레, 동양, 서양, 피지컬, 몸매, 야외, 침실, 각선미, 언니, 힙업, 글레머, 슬렌더, 은꼴. 25 1836 몸매 탄탄한 배우 추천좀.

여자 허벌 기준

여자 가슴 짤

요시나가 아카네 키 150 i b100 w59 h90, 정말 최고의 몸매, 유메노 아이카의 작품입니다. 가장 매끈한 슬렌더 몸매를 지녔음 그냥 지금은 쭉쭉, 마츠오카 치나 키 148 h b88 w57 h85. 아주 몸매가 좋은 그런 배우의 작품입니다.

한명씩만 뽑은거라 반박시 님 의견이 맞습니다. 난 몸매 탄탄하고 완벽하다 생각하는건 예나지금이나 오키타 안리 밖에 생각안남 키 크고 바스트 크고 골반도 잇고 와꾸는 내 스탈아니지만. 2 months ago 106 일본 최고의 베이글, 하지만 d컵의 볼륨감을 갖추고 있어 마르기만 한 몸매가 아닌, 여성스러운 곡선이 살아있는 건강한 몸매로 평가받습니다.

연도별 Av배우

오늘도 눈이 즐거울 만한 좋은 작품을 소개드리고자 합니다 작고 아담한 체구에 어울리지 않는 공격적인 몸매를 가진 유메노 아이카의.. Com › board › 253491..

요즘 외모,몸매 밸런스 1티어 av 배우들 웃긴자료, 츠지이 호노카연기력 괜찮고, 육감적인 몸매장르 불문 꽤 볼만한 육덕배우스타킹 좋아하시는, 여러분이 생각하는 몸매 원탑은 누구신가요. Who am i text me records. 정말 최고의 몸매, 유메노 아이카의 작품입니다.

연운 무명검 구현검

310k subscribers218 videos. 유메노 아이카 키 149 h b79 w52 h78. 몸매 평가 이상적인 슬렌더 라인 160cm의 키에 잘록한 허리 58cm를 가진 전형적인 슬렌더 체형입니다, Com › board › 451830일본 배우, 품번 검색 avdbs, 64k views 5 years ago more, 마츠오카 치나 키 148 h b88 w57 h85.

마츠오카 치나 키 148 h b88 w57 h85 유메노 아이카 키 149 h b79 w52 h78 요시나가 아카네 키 150 i b100 w59 h90 나카노 나오 키 151 h b95 w56 h84 미우라 사쿠라 키 152 g b79 w52 h78 요시. 마츠오카 치나 키 148 h b88 w57 h85 유메노 아이카 키 149 h b79 w52 h78 요시나가 아카네 키 150 i b100 w59 h90 나카노 나오 키 151 h b95 w56 h84 미우라 사쿠라 키 152 g b79 w52 h78 요시. 25 1836 몸매 탄탄한 배우 추천좀. 후보 이오리 히메카 153, 시로하나 논 156, 이토 마유키, 사쿠라 모모 160, 코이부치 모모나 161, 이토 read more.

오구라유나 키

이토 마유키 ㄴ 허리에서 골반 내려가는 라인이 개지리고 허리 움직임이 좋아서 여성 상위 자세에서 포텐이 터짐 카미키 레이read more. 요즘 외모,몸매 밸런스 1티어 av 배우들 웃긴자료. 몸매 탄탄한 배우 추천좀 스타크래프트. 다소 주관적인 신장별 베스트 몸매 정리.

다소 주관적인 신장별 베스트 몸매 정리, 후보 이오리 히메카 153, 시로하나 논 156, 이토 마유키, 사쿠라 모모 160, 코이부치 모모나 161, 이토 read more, 64k views 5 years ago more. Com › board › 452847일본 배우, 품번 검색 avdbs. 사야마 아이개인적 추천1순위미친듯한 연기력,육덕몸매 남자가 흥분할만한 요소 다갖춤각종 ntr 작품 전문 배우최근 작품 내용중 남편과 전화통화중 조카에게 강제 삽입후 중출 당하는 씬이 압도적2. 올드고전배우는 잘못느끼겠어서 올드배우 제외 추천부탁드립니다.

여자 흉통 크기 디시 츠지이 호노카연기력 괜찮고, 육감적인 몸매장르 불문 꽤 볼만한 육덕배우스타킹 좋아하시는. 난 몸매 탄탄하고 완벽하다 생각하는건 예나지금이나 오키타 안리 밖에 생각안남 키 크고 바스트 크고 골반도 잇고 와꾸는 내 스탈아니지만. 요즘 외모,몸매 밸런스 1티어 av 배우들 웃긴자료. 마츠오카 치나 키 148 h b88 w57 h85. 한명씩만 뽑은거라 반박시 님 의견이 맞습니다. 영서 벅지

여자똥설사방귀 요시나가 아카네 키 150 i b100 w59 h90. 한명씩만 뽑은거라 반박시 님 의견이 맞습니다. 사야마 아이개인적 추천1순위미친듯한 연기력,육덕몸매 남자가 흥분할만한 요소 다갖춤각종 ntr 작품 전문 배우최근 작품 내용중 남편과 전화통화중 조카에게 강제 삽입후 중출 당하는 씬이 압도적2. 추천품번iptd646레전드 작품 mide021 2. 한명씩만 뽑은거라 반박시 님 의견이 맞습니다. 여학생 브라 디시

연예인 젖꼭지 몸매 탄탄한 배우 추천좀 스타크래프트. 마츠오카 치나 키 148 h b88 w57 h85. 정말 최고의 몸매, 유메노 아이카의 작품입니다. 크고 아름다운 가슴 과 날씬한 허리골반 라인으로 상체파와 하체파를 동시에 만족시키는 배우로 유명하다. 가장 매끈한 슬렌더 몸매를 지녔음 그냥 지금은 쭉쭉. 여자 주인님 디시

오가키 소프랜드 이치노 아오이 1998년생 g컵 쿠노 히나노 2001년생 g컵 샤쿠 아리스 2003년생 e컵 메가미 준 1999년생 g컵 나기 히카루 1998년생 j컵 이토 마유키read more. Com › board › 253491. 추천품번iptd646레전드 작품 mide021 2. 요즘 외모,몸매 밸런스 1티어 av 배우들 웃긴자료. 마츠오카 치나 키 148 h b88 w57 h85 유메노 아이카 키 149 h b79 w52 h78 요시나가 아카네 키 150 i b100 w59 h90 나카노 나오 키 151 h b95 w56 h84 미우라 사쿠라 키 152 g b79 w52 h78 요시.

옛날 일본 보추 만들기 25 1836 몸매 탄탄한 배우 추천좀. 다소 주관적인 신장별 베스트 몸매 정리. 한명씩만 뽑은거라 반박시 님 의견이 맞습니다. 310k subscribers218 videos. 64k views 5 years ago more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.