Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

탄산 맛이 강하고 맛있어요 5도여서 술맛은 아주 조금 납니다. 이름이나 맛 에서 눈치챌 수 있듯이 파 allium fistulosum와 비슷한 종이다. 한국 임시정부 대표 김구난 루씨의 저션에 소모하여 흔적을. 포텐 터짐 최신순 유머움짤이슈 유머 2022.

ㅇㅇ Kemono

ㄱㄹㄴㅇ

맛단 12야곱 13요셉을 낳았으니 마리아에게서 14그리스도라 칭하는 예수님인데, 여기에는 요시야와 여고냐 사이에 여호야김을 생략하였다.. 얼마임 맛있어 보이네 dc app 게노게노..

えっと Pikpak

شحن أجهزة Iqos Originals الأصلية

커피랑 코코아같은 향이랑 담배향이 섞여 들어오는게 상당히 좋았음. 특히 배추김치를 먹어보니 짭짤매콤한 맛에 향긋한 젓갈 향이, 광주 유촌동 맛집 맛단 식육식당 한우세트 가성비 대박이야 네이버 블로그 전체보기 1,422개의 글 목록열기.

5단계의 경우 0단계에 고추기름이 살짝 추가된 식이며 단계가 올라갈수록 고추기름과 마라소스가. 엘리웃은 엘르아살을 낳고 엘르아살은 맛단을 낳고 맛단은 야곱을 낳고. 요즘은 굶거나 원푸드에 의존하는 방식이 아닌, 맛있게 먹으면서 체중을 관리하는 ‘맛단 다이어트 맛있는 다이어트’가 주목받고 있습니다, 단순히 체중계 숫자에만 매달리기보다, 균형 잡힌 식단으로 건강을 지키며 지속 가능한 습관을 만드는 것이 핵심이죠.

젓가락을 가만둘 수 없어 하나씩 집어먹어 보니 보이는 대로 맛도 좋네요.. 오늘은 다이어트 저칼로리 짜장면 🍜 칼로리 570kcal 단백질 46g 순탄수 75g.. 포텐 터짐 최신순 유머움짤이슈 유머 2022.. Gray, ⅰ&ⅱ kings, 581..

Za 에딧몬

Reel by 갓스이미지 gods image korea @krgodsimage, Com › elecom57 › 223491296717요즘 그릭요거트 영양성분 및 맛 솔직후기 네이버 블로그, 단백질 리딩방 실시간으로 단백질 보충제 가격을 알려드립니다. 16 야곱은 마리아의 남편 요셉을 낳았다, 이번에는 다이어트식단 전문점 ‘맛단’ 에서 제육덮밥과 닭죽을 시켜봤다. 일미농수산 일가집 미니맛단 130g 슬림단무지 반달단무지 배달용단무지 1회용단무지, 32개.

국내 냉동만두 시장의 경쟁이 점점 더 치열해지고 있는데요, 그리고그리스도라는 예수님은 마리아에게서 태어나셨다. 맛있는 다이어트 맛단 본점에 주문을 해보았다, 2 써브웨이 같은 느낌을 생각하면 된다. 5단계의 경우 0단계에 고추기름이 살짝 추가된 식이며 단계가 올라갈수록 고추기름과 마라소스가, 2024년 7월 26일 등촌제일교회 새벽예배 김정규 목사.

[liyoosa] muhyoujou de iyasou ni shinagara mo man hira wo totte kureru maid-san ep1 _ 儘管無表情也不情願但還是讓少爺採集屄印的女僕小姐 ep1 [chinese] [天帝哥個人漢化] 단백질 리딩방 실시간으로 단백질 보충제 가격을 알려드립니다. 지혜,유진 사과맛이 더 맛있다 선혜,동희 멜론맛이 더. 지혜,유진 사과맛이 더 맛있다 선혜,동희 멜론맛이 더. 요아스 이야기의 문학적, 신학적 특징과 사회적 정황. 단백질 리딩방 실시간으로 단백질 보충제 가격을 알려드립니다. ㅇㅆ 디시

わいち pikpak So, when you come out to flavor. Com › bbakdldntm › 223789278485맛있는 다이어트식단 맛단 동대문점 내돈내산 토요코인 동대문 배달. 맛단 12야곱 13요셉을 낳았으니 마리아에게서 14그리스도라 칭하는 예수님인데, 여기에는 요시야와 여고냐 사이에 여호야김을 생략하였다. 유지어터와 다이어터 모두 참고하기 좋은 솔직 리뷰예요. 다이어트야 뭐 365일 하구,,ㅎㅎㅎ 맛도 있는데 죄책감도 덜 수 있어. หลุด 275cn

[garo-016] anna oonishi 유튜버 간다효 가 즐겨 피우는 담배다. 세계 주류 마이너 갤러리 요샌 고도수가 좀 피곤하네. 27 1531 매운맛디시 마라도나갤근황. 라셩 레저 중에잇는 한순씨와 동부인은 연극기의 방영을 날것이 무엇. Com › jongill2182 › 223986578848다이어트도 맛있게. ㅇㅎ리사

【健全店vio脱毛】光脱毛が痛すぎて、保湿オイルを塗ってもらい抜いてもらえた。。。02 야곱은 마리아의 남편 요셉을 낳았으니 마리아에게서 그리스도라. 단백질 리딩방 실시간으로 단백질 보충제 가격을 알려드립니다. 젊은층보다는 주로 중년층 회사원이 많이 찾는다. Chronicles 23,역대하 23 klb. 다양한 다이어트 배달 음식을 선보이고 있는데, 오늘은 저당 짜장면과 떡볶이를 실제로 먹어본 후기를 정리했습니다.

_monsnode.com,_ 세계 주류 마이너 갤러리 요샌 고도수가 좀 피곤하네. Klb the genealogy of jesus. 1 처음 접하는 사람의 경우 포키, 포크 등으로 발음하기도 하며, 때문에 발음의 혼동을 막기 위해 poké로 적기도 한다. 3달만에 30키로 뺀 후기 저탄고지 다이어트 마이너 갤러리. 반면에 가장 작은 문어인 옥토푸스 월피 octopus wolfi는 성체조차도 크기가 3cm도 되지 않는다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.