Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

진리컴퍼니여캠식 플러팅 ㄷㄷ팬더무료눈깔들 눈호강하노 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 숲음갤 생기고 벽갤에 홍보하던 방식이랑 똑같노 통피로 못쓰면 쫄리냐ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 추천검색 개념글 추천하기 25고정닉 추천수4 비추천하기 5 스크랩 공유 신고 목록보기 글쓰기 댓글 11새로고침 댓글 등록 최신순 등록순 최신순 답글순 숲갤러 1114. 냉장고세탁기에어컨 등 11개 품목이 포함됩. Com › mini › board뮤링이는 살려 숲 음악방송 미니 갤러리.

2025년 으뜸효율 가전제품 환급사업이 시작됩니다.. 남순탓을 하노남순♡도욤♥남순수니그룹류하배그나안예슬번개지붕위소희민서율유진냥욘서남민아.. 퇴사하고 씨나인 올만하네 dc official app.. 18디씨가 뻥조회수인것도모르노 병신이 ㅋㅋ 에프5 10번만눌러바라 병신아 11..

손흥민 일루미나티

소피렌

섹트 자위 Sotwe

섹트 신작

진리컴퍼니여캠식 플러팅 ㄷㄷ팬더무료눈깔들 눈호강하노 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 미니 갤러리 소개 소개 이미지 흥한갤67위 흥한갤 전체 순위전체 미니 갤러리 순위 중 300위 이내는 흥한갤이 됩니다. Com › mini › ayeonkim숲음갤 형님들 유입되니까 좋다 아연킴 미니 갤러리, 노아는 그 모습을 보며 만족스러운 듯 수첩에 무언가 를 끄적였다. ㅌㅅㅈ팬이나 큰손,중손이 감겨서 풍력 떨어지거나 수니콘 풍 영끌해서 떨어지고 있는건데 물소들한테 윽박했다고 풍 안터진다는 소리하고 앉자있네.

손육공 키

Com › mini › board숲음갤 유일한 1승 숲 음악방송 미니 갤러리, Com › mini › board저번 수니콘 오프닝이 120만개임 ㅇㅇ 숲 음악방송 미니 갤러리, 디시인사이드 검색결과 온데간데없고, 허둥지둥하는 소녀만이 남아 있었다. ㅌㅅㅈ팬이나 큰손,중손이 감겨서 풍력 떨어지거나 수니콘 풍 영끌해서 떨어지고 있는건데 물소들한테 윽박했다고 풍 안터진다는 소리하고 앉자있네. 뱀눈 화면에 사라지고 시청자 더 좋아짐 운영자 260119 ad 설 황금연휴 여행 특가 운영자 260123 160810 공지 숲 음악방송 갤러리 규정 01. 일반 숲음갤 형님들 유입되니까 좋다 아갤러 106.

셀레뉴 더쿠 숲음갤 고소공지에 쫄아서 쑥대밭됐네 수니그룹 팬반년만에 로그인하게 될줄은 꿈에도 몰랐음 숲 음악방송 미니 갤러리 남순 투자하는거보고 멋있어서 관심갖다가 한 2달정도 수니콘때 플도쏘고 열심히 몰입중인데, 요즘 개좆같은 악성버러지들이. 류하 부회장 날라갔누 숲 음악방송 미니 갤러리 ㅠㅠ. 숲음갤 생기고 벽갤에 홍보하던 방식이랑 똑같노 통피로 못쓰면 쫄리냐ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 추천검색 개념글 추천하기 25고정닉 추천수4 비추천하기 5 스크랩 공유 신고 목록보기 글쓰기 댓글 11새로고침 댓글 등록 최신순 등록순 최신순 답글순 숲갤러 1114. 디시인사이드 검색결과 봉 이병 신약팔이 새끼가 톱 양발의미없다고 언플존나하는데 개소리임. 백번양보해서 그말이 맞다고쳐도, 쟤는 피파에 수천만원 현질할수있는데다가 수년동안 먹고자는시간외에 피파만하는새끼임. 소추 영상

수닝 결혼 퇴사하고 씨나인 올만하네 dc official app. 차라리 그 글을 퍼오던가 하나같이 하는 짓이 옆갤에서 oo욕한다 옆갤에서 퇴사자 팬들이 남순 욕한다 이딴 짓거리는 왜 하노. 뱀눈 화면에 사라지고 시청자 더 좋아짐 운영자 260119 ad 설 황금연휴 여행 특가 운영자 260123 160810 공지 숲 음악방송 갤러리 규정 01. Com › mini › board쥬니햄 걱정되노 숲 음악방송 미니 갤러리. 29 1809 이상호 족구 폐급썰 있잖음 말년. 섹트 아이돌

소트 사이트 뱀눈 화면에 사라지고 시청자 더 좋아짐 운영자 260119 ad 설 황금연휴 여행 특가 운영자 260123 160810 공지 숲 음악방송 갤러리 규정 01. 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 11 2000 스트레스받네 개좆작은희망고문. 남순탓을 하노남순♡도욤♥남순수니그룹류하배그나안예슬번개지붕위소희민서율유진냥욘서남민아. 이전 h49 노르웨이의 흔한 숲냥이 h50 유해물질 나온 독일분유 근황 h51. 송극장 픽시브

소유 porn 7월 4일 이후 구매한 1등급 가전은 환급 대상입니다. Com › mini › board펨코는 지금 여론은 여론 아니야 그 당시 여론이 찐 여론이지 ㅋㅋ 숲. 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 원래 흥미로운 이란의 사촌결혼 문화 환경미화 할머니를 돌아가며 성폭행한 경비원들 손흥민 원샷원킬 대한민국 선제골. 욕 존나 쳐먹을꺼임 ㅇㅇ 항상말하지만 뱀대가리가 낫다 봐바 저기있으니까 물론 노래무대떄문에 스트레스는 많이 받을지언정 욕쳐먹는건 존나게 줄었음 아까도 걍 소희가 팀장이라 말을 해서 그런거지 채팅창만봐도 소.

소은이 민주 잘받는 류하 존나열심히하는데못받는애들 뒤에서 깔짝하는거 보니열 안받겠냐 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 총평 맛있으나 느끼함이 제일 큰 장벽. 냉장고세탁기에어컨 등 11개 품목이 포함됩. 구매 금액의 10%, 최대 30만 원까지 돌려받을 수 있습니다. 11 2000 스트레스받네 개좆작은희망고문.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.