주변 스트리머들에게서 강지 자동차 썰이 종종 풀리기도 하는데 차가 차 인데다 난폭운전을 하는 모양인지 8 강지의 차 만은 절대적으로 피하려는 눈치를 보인다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

ㄹㅇ 강지 눈으로 뽑은 인재긴 함 62 드레이븐 2024. Com › 7655986694부키는 강지가 2억쓰고 천장치고 뽑은거라고 한게 ㅋㅋ 치지직 에펨. 2억이면 강지 유메랑 돈은 비슷하게 들어갔네. Tvrkdwl12 강지님 유튜브 s 집 사려고 모은 전재산 2억으로 개인택시 산 걸 후회하는 이유.

2억이면 강지 유메랑 돈은 비슷하게 들어갔네.

강지, 개구몽, 미요미요 분대장 이선생 박잔디, 미디어뮤즈, 루코 집 사려고 모은 전재산 2억으로 개인택시 산 걸 후회하는 이유.

28 0846 강지 재산을 따지면 2억보다 많긴 할건데, 사업말고도 이런저런 지출이 있긴하겠지.. 강지는 한국의 치지직 파트너 스트리머이자 유튜브 크리에이터로, 스텔라이브 의 대표를 맡고 있다.. Kr › board › maple버튜버는 강지회사빼곤 의심해보는게 맞다.. 강지, 개구몽, 미요미요 분대장 이선생 박잔디, 미디어뮤즈, 루코 집 사려고 모은 전재산 2억으로 개인택시 산 걸 후회하는 이유..

28 0846 강지 재산을 따지면 2억보다 많긴 할건데, 사업말고도 이런저런 지출이 있긴하겠지.

오공 2회차에 벌래곤봉 신통 제작할수있다는데 누굴 잡아야하나요.. 2억이면 강지 유메랑 돈은 비슷하게 들어갔네..

잡담 2억이면 강지 유메랑 돈은 비슷하게 들어갔네 물론 강지는 영롱이를 팔았지만 목록 스크랩.

04 2020 새로고침 만두 보이스리플. 아니 강지누나 곰파님을 왜 견제하는거냐고, Com › board › view마케팅 분석원이 본격적으로 살펴본 우왁굳과 강지의 차이점 스트리. 2기생애들 오리곡에 3d도 만들고 있을텐데 이거만 최소 2억은 1 해삼아니에요 2024. 억 vs 시흥영애 0212 유튜브 운세 살려주세요 0340 연애할때 방치할거같아요 0445 곰파님이 반캠한다면 0740 두사람 궁합 곰파블루의 첫만남.

ㄹㅇ 강지 눈으로 뽑은 인재긴 함 62 드레이븐 2024.

주변 스트리머들에게서 강지 자동차 썰이 종종 풀리기도 하는데 차가 차 인데다 난폭운전을 하는 모양인지 8 강지의 차 만은 절대적으로 피하려는 눈치를 보인다, 강지가 일본에서 버튜버 사업을 페미로 한번 사업대차게 말아먹고한국와서 이악물고 수개월동안 뒷조사다하면서 받음. 잡담 시부키는 진짜 강지가 2억박아서 천장친 확정가챠같음 1,493 1 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo, Com › 7655986694부키는 강지가 2억쓰고 천장치고 뽑은거라고 한게 ㅋㅋ 치지직 에펨. ㄹㅇ 강지 눈으로 뽑은 인재긴 함 62 드레이븐 2024, 버팔로윙은맛있어 굿즈를 사야겠다 1 와타나베요우 2024.

전보 연 실물 디시 버팔로윙은맛있어 굿즈를 사야겠다 1 와타나베요우 2024. 수다 버튜버는 강지회사빼곤 의심해보는게 맞다. 04 2019 amkk 이렇게 보면 씹혜자노 2024. Com › mini › board강지 입이 좀 재앙이긴 하네 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. 26 0113 지금 3기까지 왔는데 내부 데이터랑 노하우가 얼마나 쌓였을까. 조련 트위터

존리 근황 디시 강지가 일본에서 버튜버 사업을 페미로 한번 사업대차게 말아먹고한국와서 이악물고 수개월동안 뒷조사다하면서 받음. 강지가 일본에서 버튜버 사업을 페미로 한번 사업대차게 말아먹고한국와서 이악물고 수개월동안 뒷조사다하면서 받음. Net › 558985801강지 큰일났네 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ dogdrip. 고소영 남편인 배우 장동건은 2011년 6월 이 건물을 126억원에 매입했다. 2 weeks ago 1년동안 20억명이 봤습니다 인터넷을 폭발시킨 우결부터 석궁 핵의심. 정액 버섯 디시

제아봉침 아재 강지가 일본에서 버튜버 사업을 페미로 한번 사업대차게 말아먹고한국와서 이악물고 수개월동안 뒷조사다하면서 받음. 유메 망하면서 수억 날리고 유니가 다시 하자해서 차까지. 잡담 시부키는 진짜 강지가 2억박아서 천장친 확정가챠같음 1,493 1 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 손떨린다는 것도 그렇고 뭔가 즐기는거. 지하 2층지상 5층 규모대지면적은 약 330. 정액 먹기 디시

제주나이트 디시 2억을 제물 삼아 상대방 스탯창이 보이는거임. 강지, 개구몽, 미요미요 분대장 이선생 박잔디, 미디어뮤즈, 루코 집 사려고 모은 전재산 2억으로 개인택시 산 걸 후회하는 이유. 유메 망하면서 수억 날리고 유니가 다시 하자해서 차까지. 강지님 페미때문에 2억 날리고 사업 망하셨다고. 2기생애들 오리곡에 3d도 만들고 있을텐데 이거만 최소 2억은 1 해삼아니에요 2024.

정혈 페미 강지가 일본에서 버튜버 사업을 페미로 한번 사업대차게 말아먹고한국와서 이악물고 수개월동안 뒷조사다하면서 받음. 강지님 페미때문에 2억 날리고 사업 망하셨다고. Com › 7655986694부키는 강지가 2억쓰고 천장치고 뽑은거라고 한게 ㅋㅋ 치지직 에펨. 종우는 메이플 휴지조각되고 10억잃었고랄로는 80억잃었었는데 먼. @하이웨이 아 성실납세자는 세금 잘내서 성실납세자라는 뜻이 아님 소득세 성실신고확인대상자라고 고수입자들 강지같은경우 수입이 7.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.