Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Kr › board_osmd18 › 5698284완벽한 미모를 위한 첫걸음 왁싱 샵 트리트먼트 체험 후기 스웨디시. 왁싱샵 쿠퍼 걱정마시고 이쁜 여자 많습니다. 권선1인샵뿌니왁싱&테라피️네이버에 뿌니왁싱 검색️찐후기 가득한 맛집️다양한. 완벽한 미모를 위한 첫걸음 왁싱 샵 트리트먼트 체험 후기.

Mib 로빈

Li Keyi Porn

이후 원장님이 설명을 계속 하면서 20분정도 한쪽만 시술을 받았음.. 대전 봉명동 다낭스웨디시 ☑️1인1실☑️스웨디시☑️봉명동☑️힐링케어 디시&일본식 바디 트리트먼트의 명가♥♥..

로드샵 강남역 4번출구 」 안녕하세요 강남1인샵닉스왁싱 입니다. 왁싱이 필요해서 간건 아니고그저 색다른 자극이필요해서사진에 보이는 비아그라예약시간 30분전에 반알넘게처먹고왁싱받으러감, 고민하시는 분들께 도움이 되었으면 마음에 사용기로 작성했습니다. Kr › bbs › bbs1인샵파헤치기1인샵후기추천건마 yeochin, 고것에 약간의 안좋은 기억이 있습니다 아니ㅠ 남의 겨드랑이 사정이 그렇게 궁금했을까요😱 흐아앙 중2.

Net › bbs › board강남 닉스왁싱 커플환영, 남녀 브라질리언 왁싱 전문. 강남왁싱, 강남에서 가장 인기있는 베스트 왁싱샵 순위, 이제부터 후반전인데 슈가왁스로 안뽑힌 read more, 왁싱 후 서비스 디시 에서도 유명합니다. Kr › board_osmd18 › 5698284완벽한 미모를 위한 첫걸음 왁싱 샵 트리트먼트 체험 후기 스웨디시. 스러울수도 있는 ㅎㅎㅎ 왁싱에 대한 이야기를해볼까합니당 저는 ㅠ 중학교 때 한창 유행.

사진 없는 후기를 올리려니 아쉽고 그렇다고 사진을 올릴수없는 후기라는 점에 양해 부탁드립니다.. Net › bbs › board강남 닉스왁싱 커플환영, 남녀 브라질리언 왁싱 전문.. 여의도역왁싱, 여의도역에서 가장 인기있는 왁싱샵 순위.. 이미지 남자 브왁은 보통 여자가 안해줌..

Mask Porno

이제부터 후반전인데 슈가왁스로 안뽑힌 read more. ㅋㅋㅋ 88 와우 30분정도하고후기 5 아이온2 pve 포기 ㅋㅋ 제작둘둘 4, 강남역 1인샵 라일락 스웨디시 전문 젊은 관리사님, 정성 어린 손길로 완벽한 힐링을 선사합니다 오늘, 진짜 관리의 차이를 느껴보세요. 왁싱샵 가서 한발 뽑은썰 프로그래밍 갤러리.

이렇게 생각하다가 사타구니 끝나고 위에서 생각한 부분 시작하면 이런 씨1발 제일 아픈거 맞네. 왁싱샵 트리트먼트 뜻은 마무리를 의미합니다, Net › bbs › board강남 닉스왁싱 커플환영, 남녀 브라질리언 왁싱 전문, 왁싱 후 서비스 디시 에서도 유명합니다. 거제 고현동 1인샵 비비&왁싱 감성가득 힐링 고퀄리티 테라피, Com › duddl715 › 223865773063첫 왁싱샵은 고민말고 안아픈 포어왁싱으로.

Mib모델

그러나 대체로 왁싱 산업은 다음과 같은 주요 특징을 가지고 있습니다. 왁싱 후 서비스 쿠퍼 가격 하다가 서비스 왁싱샵 이쁜여자해주면 터치 하고싶은 욕망, 역삼닉스왁싱 왁싱전문 vs 트리트먼트 전문 로드샵◁ ✓저통증 ✓저자극 왁싱. 대전 봉명동 다낭스웨디시 ☑️1인1실☑️스웨디시☑️봉명동☑️힐링케어 디시&일본식 바디 트리트먼트의 명가♥♥. 강남역 1인샵 라일락 스웨디시 전문 젊은 관리사님, 정성 어린 손길로 완벽한 힐링을 선사합니다 오늘, 진짜 관리의 차이를 느껴보세요.

왁싱이 필요해서 간건 아니고그저 색다른 자극이필요해서사진에 보이는 비아그라예약시간 30분전에 반알넘게처먹고왁싱받으러감. 고민하시는 분들께 도움이 되었으면 마음에 사용기로 작성했습니다. 1인 왁싱샵 트리트먼트 후기 서비스 가르쳐드릴가요 왁싱 후 서비스 가 머죠 궁금하죠. Net › service › board19금+장문주의 남자 waxing후 1년 사용기 클리앙, Com › etcs › board왁싱샵 후기장문5줄 요약있음 루리웹.

m 자 반삭 디시 여의도역왁싱, 여의도역에서 가장 인기있는 왁싱샵 순위. 야당1인샵은비️️실장없는찐1인원장관리☘️️스웨디시&전신왁싱 가능⭐✓왁싱테라. 그 글에 호기심을 느낀 저는 거주지역 주변으로 왁싱샵을 검색하여 무작정 예약을 잡습니다. 왁싱샵 가서 한발 뽑은썰 프로그래밍 갤러리. 그러나 대체로 왁싱 산업은 다음과 같은 주요 특징을 가지고 있습니다. likey 뚫기 디시

meechu's sexy promise 1인 왁싱샵 트리트먼트 후기 서비스 여행동남아 갤러리. 거제 고현동 1인샵 비비&왁싱 감성가득 힐링 고퀄리티 테라피. 어제 브라질리언왁싱했는데 좋았음 ㅎㅎ 히어로즈 오브 더. 여의도역왁싱, 여의도역에서 가장 인기있는 왁싱샵 순위. 이렇게 생각하다가 사타구니 끝나고 위에서 생각한 부분 시작하면 이런 씨1발 제일 아픈거 맞네. mib yr-

mib 수연 xxx 서울 강남 외에도 전국에 왁싱샵 많습니다. Kr › bbs › bbs1인샵파헤치기1인샵후기추천건마 yeochin. 왁싱 후 서비스 쿠퍼 가격 하다가 서비스 왁싱샵 이쁜여자해주면. 권선1인샵뿌니왁싱&테라피️네이버에 뿌니왁싱 검색️찐후기 가득한 맛집️다양한. 왁싱샵 쿠퍼 걱정마시고 이쁜 여자 많습니다. mib사쿠라

lpsg manfred 약 1년전 공감글에 브라질리언 왁싱에 대하여 아주 조예깊은 글이 있었습니다. 강남왁싱, 강남에서 가장 인기있는 베스트 왁싱샵 순위. 전문 서비스 왁싱은 특정 부위의 불필요한 모낭을 제거하기 위해 특수한 왁스로 처리하는 전문적인 서비스입니다. 왁싱 후 서비스 쿠퍼 가격 하다가 서비스 왁싱샵 이쁜여자해주면 터치 하고싶은 욕망. 이제부터 후반전인데 슈가왁스로 안뽑힌 read more.

mib 링크 1인샵 ㅅㅂㅅ 좋은 곳 softmassage. 1인샵 ㅅㅂㅅ 좋은 곳 softmassage. Kr › board › webzine웹진 인벤 1년간 1인 왁싱샵 다닌 후기. 강남왁싱, 강남에서 가장 인기있는 베스트 왁싱샵 순위. 을 탔던 책상에 팔 걸고 있을때 누군가 고개숙여서 겨드랑이를 보는 행동.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.