Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › daikanyama東京代官山一日遊：6個口袋名單一次看！距離很近走路就可以到呦～. 代官山位于东京的涉谷区，毗邻中目黑与惠比寿，因为有很多驻日使馆和外企设立于此，有不少老外生活在这一带。 应运而生的除了高端住宅，还有隐藏在街道里的各种品牌时装、个性小店、人气咖啡馆、甜品店和异域料理等。. 绿树成荫的街道、别致的精品店、充满艺术气息的咖啡馆以及精心设计的建筑，让人忍不住放慢脚步，漫步街头，细细品味当下。 对于那些寻求现代精致与悠闲魅力完美融合的旅行者来说，代官山无疑是远离涩谷和新宿喧嚣的理想去处。. Com › article › v2ujylfjbzi日本深度游 代官山10家逛吃推荐+8家剁手中古店.

Kissjav 왕따

Kissjav 高校

上门服务（选妹微信7090046）微信附近的人400元2小时b7i商品就在蝦皮購物！ 現貨 寶包星人 日本手作代官山curly collection 迷你小草莓捲髮.. Com › article › v2ujylfjbzi日本深度游 代官山10家逛吃推荐+8家剁手中古店.. 將重點行程放在中間，前後會穿插些東京市區想去的美食、逛街行程，如 代官山 、 中目黑 、 澀谷 、有樂町、 銀座 等，而 代官山一日遊 就是首日行程，而飯店我們預訂了鄰近的 惠比壽霍利克飯店（ebisuholic hotel），這間飯店我們很喜歡，地點好、交通方便！.. 在被稱為「森林中的圖書館」的非常有型的「代官山tsite」，沿著雜誌街有3棟建築相連，按照外國書籍、古書等類別設置了6個圖書賣場。 在這個愛書者的天堂，無論購書前後，都可以在書架的閱覽區或咖啡區閱讀書籍。 有專門的服務人員提供服務。..

东京最优雅的大人游乐场——代官山全攻略。 从代官山站出发的零失败散步路线，打卡地标茑屋书店 tsite、forestgate、garden terrace，还有hollywood ranch market、maison kitsuné等宝藏店铺巡礼。 附tabelog百名店美食推荐。. 3,651,000+ 亚丁市约炮同城约炮『快速约爱网m5255．cc小妹约炮』哪里有色情服务_亚丁市找美女上门服务全套_亚丁市美女包养小姐包养&sozwg jobs in united states 113,863. Search results for 东莞万江区外围vx4124431提供顶级.

如果您渴望遇见全新的自己或想体验日本独特的高品质护发服务，这里将是您的理想选择。 在轻松愉悦的环境中，尽情享受由专业技师打造的发型设计。 欢迎您前来体验这一次特别的护发之旅，我们期待着您的光临！, 代官山位于东横线上，与 渋谷、中目黑、惠比寿皆是徒步10分钟 可到的范围，这区可说是 日本上流社会的代名词，跟银座的奢华成熟味，以及六本木的年轻潮流文化有些不同。, Ems 服服了youpp已经不止n多个人投诉ems了年前还看到新闻说ems的收费由原来的20元起改为10元起了真是佩服中国邮政在有这么多知名物注公司新起后在人家的一流服务态度下.

Jisoo Idolfap

代官山位于东横线上，与 渋谷、中目黑、惠比寿皆是徒步10分钟 可到的范围，这区可说是 日本上流社会的代名词，跟银座的奢华成熟味，以及六本木的年轻潮流文化有些不同。, 3658000+ 罗定加益镇找美女上门服务全套﹛快速约爱网. 在這裡能邊看書邊享用美味的咖啡與餐飲。店內不但販售音樂、電影、文具等娛樂用品，同時也提供旅遊行程的建議、計畫及安排的全套服務。read more. 色情按摩店in 代官山, 东京 red light japan.

3,658,000+ 罗定加益镇找美女上门服务全套﹛快速约爱网ye998．com小妹约炮﹜小妹上门包夜罗定加益镇美女包养小姐包养罗定加益镇约炮同城约炮, 您理解、同意并授权订购平台因提供代订服务，于必要时将以您的代理人名义向餐厅提出订位相关需求。 尽管有kkday的使用条款的内容，但本产品是餐厅和用户之间的直接合同。 kkday客服会尽力为您提供支持，但我们无法承担任何责任，敬请谅解。, 我们提供上门烹饪服务。 传真：0334641187, Com › question › 308421672国内上门服务类平台有哪些？ 知乎, 推荐的29 名东京高级上门服务排名！ japan friday night.

Architectural projects from contemporary studios, 代官山位于东京的涉谷区，毗邻中目黑与惠比寿，因为有很多驻日使馆和外企设立于此，有不少老外生活在这一带。 应运而生的除了高端住宅，还有隐藏在街道里的各种品牌时装、个性小店、人气咖啡馆、甜品店和异域料理等。. Com › zhcn › product东京代官山 nabe manin（代官山总店）仅座位预定 kkday. 电梯间里的上门按摩广告来势汹汹。 东郊到家、往约、泰到位这类o2o（offline to offline）上门推拿服务平台，一时间占据了, Rinspecial vergue 涩谷的上门服务 欢迎外国游客. Ems 服服了youpp已经不止n多个人投诉ems了年前还看到新闻说ems的收费由原来的20元起改为10元起了真是佩服中国邮政在有这么多知名物注公司新起后在人家的一流服务态度下.

Klein dytham architecture tokyo, japan, 2011.. Japanese drama four former classmates share an apartment in daikanyama, tokyo and..

3,651,000+ 亚丁市约炮同城约炮『快速约爱网m5255．cc小妹约炮』哪里有色情服务_亚丁市找美女上门服务全套_亚丁市美女包养小姐包养&sozwg jobs in united states 113,863. Com › zh香港按摩 hong kong massage. Rinspecial vergue 涩谷的上门服务 欢迎外国游客.

Karinnoracam Leaked

在被稱為「森林中的圖書館」的非常有型的「代官山tsite」，沿著雜誌街有3棟建築相連，按照外國書籍、古書等類別設置了6個圖書賣場。 在這個愛書者的天堂，無論購書前後，都可以在書架的閱覽區或咖啡區閱讀書籍。 有專門的服務人員提供服務。. 有提供上門迎接服務。具體上車／下車範圍，請參考行程資訊。 有提供回程送回服務。具體上車／下車範圍，請參考 read more. Top花儿到家 上门服务大平台，24小时高品质上门按摩推拿spa到家服务. Com › zh香港按摩 hong kong massage. 按摩到家app 按摩到家是一家上门推拿、按摩、养生、保健、足疗、spa的o2o 上门服务平台。专业针对居家、差旅、酒店顾客提供便捷健康养生 服务。专业、正规、安全、快捷的24小时上门服务。.

joosomoa.com 3,658,000+ 罗定加益镇找美女上门服务全套﹛快速约爱网ye998．com小妹约炮﹜小妹上门包夜罗定加益镇美女包养小姐包养罗定加益镇约炮同城约炮. Architectural projects from contemporary studios. 3,658,000+ 罗定加益镇找美女上门服务全套﹛快速约爱网ye998．com小妹约炮﹜小妹上门包夜罗定加益镇美女包养小姐包养罗定加益镇约炮同城约炮. 同城上门服务的 软件平台 比如58 微信公众号还有哪些. Com › article › v2ujylfjbzi日本深度游 代官山10家逛吃推荐+8家剁手中古店. jul843

kijiro_bites porno Architectural projects from contemporary studios. Rinospecial vergue 涩谷的上门服务 欢迎外国游客. クラインダイサムアーキテクツ tokyo, japan, 2011. Com › question › 286876742同城上门服务软件有哪些？ 知乎. 您理解、同意并授权订购平台因提供代订服务，于必要时将以您的代理人名义向餐厅提出订位相关需求。 尽管有kkday的使用条款的内容，但本产品是餐厅和用户之间的直接合同。 kkday客服会尽力为您提供支持，但我们无法承担任何责任，敬请谅解。. jr 삿포로 비에이 열차 시간표

k mib missav 电梯间里的上门按摩广告来势汹汹。 东郊到家、往约、泰到位这类o2o（offline to offline）上门推拿服务平台，一时间占据了. Japanese drama four former classmates share an apartment in daikanyama, tokyo and. Com › daikanyama東京代官山一日遊：6個口袋名單一次看！距離很近走路就可以到呦～. Search results for 东莞万江区外围vx4124431提供顶级. 網站介紹因旅遊、商務等目的來到東京都的外國人能夠放心消費的日本上門服務。yoasobi heaven由『城市天堂網』負責運營，那是日本最著名的色情資訊網站之一。. jioknet

komi.ia Term 新山怎么找小姐服务联系方式〔约妹网址yu899．vip真实上门〕新山哪里有小姐上门服务 daikanyama tsite. 先说结论，题主在此保证，这种宣称上门服务，满意付费的100%都是诈骗，而且一旦被骗几乎不可能挽回损失。 我这就有一个血淋淋的经历，我的一个朋友，今年一月份一个人去西安旅游，晚上一时冲动，在tg上附近的人找. Search results for 东莞万江区外围vx4124431提供顶级. 推荐的29 名东京高级上门服务排名！ japan friday night. 同城上门服务的 软件平台 比如58 微信公众号还有哪些.

jjelly onlyfans Com › article › v2ujylfjbzi日本深度游 代官山10家逛吃推荐+8家剁手中古店. 有提供上門迎接服務。具體上車／下車範圍，請參考行程資訊。 有提供回程送回服務。具體上車／下車範圍，請參考 read more. Com › blog › 代官山攻略代官山景點一日遊東京最時髦的逛街巷弄，日本名媛都愛逛，最美蔦. Com › blog › 代官山攻略代官山景點一日遊東京最時髦的逛街巷弄，日本名媛都愛逛，最美蔦. 網站介紹因旅遊、商務等目的來到東京都的外國人能夠放心消費的日本上門服務。yoasobi heaven由『城市天堂網』負責運營，那是日本最著名的色情資訊網站之一。.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.