Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

株式会社imcf アイエムシーエフの本店住所は東京都港区赤坂5丁目2番33号にあり、法人番号は882で、設立日は2016年5月です。 最新の登記情報では、2024年12月に住所の変更をしました。 また、株式会社imcfの住所の変更回数は4回です。. Mission create value, spread to the world. Net › imcoisio株式会社アイ・エム・シー スタッフ採用公式サイト 採用・求人情. 7件の求人情報が掲載されています about 会社紹介 お客様の笑顔につながる おいしさをお届けします。 地域のお客様に心から喜んでいただける、 おいしい品をお届けしたい。 それが、私たちimcの根底にある想いです。.

히토미 Date

흑혈화

Com › company › cmi3772556001株式会社アイエムエフの求人・中途採用情報｜リクナビnextで転職. 株式会社アイ・エム・シーライフステージの転職・求人情報です。日本最大級、年間5000万ユーザーが利用する会社口コミ・評判プラットフ ォーム「エン カイシャの評判（旧ライトハウス）」では、エン独自サーベイによる企業研究や女性評価の可視化など、企業をあらゆる角度から知ることが. 株式会社アイ・エム・シー採用情報ページ vision 神戸本社勤務の経理事務を募集します 非破壊検査を手掛けて約半世紀、今では大手企業と長期的安定的に取引を行い、10年連続黒字経営を続けております。.

「株式会社アイ・エム・シー」の転職・求人・中途採用情報ページです。 株式会社アイ・エム・シーで募集中の求人情報（1件を掲載しています。 マイナビ転職の企業別求人情報一覧ページでは、関連する業種・職種の企業の求人情報なども探せます。, 印象に残った質問1 長く続けたこと印象に残った質問2 できるかわからないけど将来やってみたいこと面接の概要 ロボットみたいに淡々と read more. 価値あるものを、世界中の人々へ。 私達は新たな価値創出に投資を行い、 ブランドを創造し、インターネットを通じて世界中の人々へ届けます。 次世代の日本発グローバルブランドを インターネットを通じて創出することが私達の使命です。 value 大切にすべき. Mission create value, spread to the world, 8, 平成7年度, 89,547, 49,122, 40,425, 73,296, 64,123, 36,274, 27,849, 19,742, 12,296.

환연 미갤

エフエムシー・ケミカルズ株式会社 法人番号 010 は国税庁に登録された法人です。 法人番号指定日は20151005です。 所在地は.. 株式会社エフ・エム・アイ エフエムアイの本店住所は東京都港区麻布台1丁目11番9号にあり、法人番号は102です。 最新の登記情報では、2016年11月に住所の変更をしました。 また、株式会社エフ・エム・アイの住所の変更回数は1回です。.. Com株式会社アイ・エム・シー ライフステージ 企業サイト.. Com株式会社アイ・エム・シー ライフステージ 企業サイト..

採用に関するお問い合わせ・履歴書送付先 株式会社アイ・エム・シー 〒1600023 東京都新宿区西新宿7211 新宿ロイヤルビル805 0369089363 ・ imc採用窓口. Net › recruit › g2wawk568a8brrr株式会社アイ・エム・シーの採用サイト. エフエムシー・ケミカルズ株式会社 法人番号 010 は国税庁に登録された法人です。 法人番号指定日は20151005です。 所在地は, 株式会社アイジーエフのバイト・アルバイト・パートの求人・募集情報です。短期や単発、高時給、日払い、掛け持ちなど、バイトルオリジナル求人が満載！dip aiもお仕事探しをサポートします。自宅近くの仕事を探したり、応募前に動画で職場の雰囲気を確認したり、求人への応募状況を. 介護支援専門員（居宅介護支援事業所アイエムシー） （株）アイ・エム・シー ライフステージ 正社員 学歴不問 通勤手当あり マイカー通勤可 掲載日 2025年11月11日 詳細を見る.

採用に関するお問い合わせ・履歴書送付先 株式会社アイ・エム・シー 〒1600023 東京都新宿区西新宿7211 新宿ロイヤルビル805 0369089363 ・ imc採用窓口. Com › recruit採用情報｜アイ・エム・シー ライフステージ, アイ・エム・シー ライフステージ 〒7808018 高知県高知市竹島町131 運営施設 会社概要 事業紹介 お知らせ 採用情報 募集要項 社員の声 お問い合わせ 個人情報保護方針 facebook instagram. 勤務地： cz, olomoucký kraj, kojetín.

アイ・エム・シー ライフステージ 〒7808018 高知県高知市竹島町131 運営施設 会社概要 事業紹介 お知らせ 採用情報 募集要項 社員の声 お問い合わせ 個人情報保護方針 facebook instagram, 草加 ヘルス 求人 店員さん一押し、絶対損しないと太鼓判だったのですするちゃんを指名しました。 素晴らしかったです！ 下は最初からビチャビチャに濡れ, 株式会社アイジーエフのバイト・アルバイト・パートの求人・募集情報です。短期や単発、高時給、日払い、掛け持ちなど、バイトルオリジナル求人が満載！dip aiもお仕事探しをサポートします。自宅近くの仕事を探したり、応募前に動画で職場の雰囲気を確認したり、求人への応募状況を, A u01,u02,u03,u99 ソフトウェア保守業務, ネットワー ク保守業務,ict機器等保守業務, クラウドコンピュー ティングサー ビス, インターネット監視, セキュリティコンサルおよび監査,ict支援員等派遣業務委託,学校ネットパトロール,セキュリティ研修等. 株式会社アイ・エム・シーライフステージの求人・採用情報は50件あります。調理スタッフ（若草南）、訪問介護職員（太田上町）、介護職員（デイサービスおおはら）などの仕事や転職に関するハローワーク求人を見る ハローワーク求人検索のシゴトリサーチ会社の名前や給料・職種で, 「株式会社アイ・エム・シー」の転職・求人・中途採用情報ページです。 株式会社アイ・エム・シーで募集中の求人情報（1件を掲載しています。 マイナビ転職の企業別求人情報一覧ページでは、関連する業種・職種の企業の求人情報なども探せます。.

흑자헬스 코리안 매트릭스

Jp › recruit採用情報 imc. ブランドのecサイト開発 デジタルコンテンツディレクター, Jp › dodafront › view株式会社 アイエムシーの転職・求人・中途採用情報&boxv. Jp › dodafront › view株式会社 アイエムシーの転職・求人・中途採用情報&boxv.

히어하트 갤 の会社概要｜ready to fashion. A u01,u02,u03,u99 ソフトウェア保守業務, ネットワー ク保守業務,ict機器等保守業務, クラウドコンピュー ティングサー ビス, インターネット監視, セキュリティコンサルおよび監査,ict支援員等派遣業務委託,学校ネットパトロール,セキュリティ研修等. Català deutsch english español français italiano nederlands. Likes, 0 comments imclifestage on febru 従業員インタビュー第二弾！part② 今回は訪問看護リハビリステーションそらとこころの谷さんに前職でどのような仕事をしていたのか聞いてみました。 高知 高知県 高知市 kochi 介護 介護施設 訪問看護 看護師 求人 求人募集 採用 従業員募集. すべての求人を見る 2034476989のロゴ写真. 히어하트 sex

히토미 리다이렉트 求人情報 イベント情報 magazine topics ネットワーク ログイン 登録. Bereichsleiterin logistik schichtleiterin area manager. 株式会社imcfの事業内容やエンジニア組織の特徴、今後の展望を取材！社員からの評判もわかる itエンジニア・デザイナーの転職・採用情報ならレバテックダイレクト. Com株式会社アイ・エム・シー ライフステージ 企業サイト. Mimc エムアイエムシー｜京都府の求人・転職・派遣の求人一覧ページです。 idaは、ファッション・コスメ業界専門の人材派遣・紹介を行っています。外資系、ラグジュアリーブランド、アパレルの求人 販売員・美容部員の派遣・転職をサポート致します。. 후야디시

히토미 렘 Likes, 0 comments imclifestage on febru 従業員インタビュー第二弾！part② 今回は訪問看護リハビリステーションそらとこころの谷さんに前職でどのような仕事をしていたのか聞いてみました。 高知 高知県 高知市 kochi 介護 介護施設 訪問看護 看護師 求人 求人募集 採用 従業員募集. We are the fashion incubator for excellent. 販売：販売 レディース 国内アパレル系web関連 ec：sns運用販促 マーケティング：プレスpr. 株式会社アイ・エム・シー採用情報ページ vision 神戸本社勤務の経理事務を募集します 非破壊検査を手掛けて約半世紀、今では大手企業と長期的安定的に取引を行い、10年連続黒字経営を続けております。. Imcf（アイエムシーエフ、英名：imcf co. 히토미 노숙자

히토미 izure 信頼性データ デバイス mtbfmttffit. アイ・エム・シー ライフステージ 〒7808018 高知県高知市竹島町131 運営施設 会社概要 事業紹介 お知らせ 採用情報 募集要項 社員の声 お問い合わせ 個人情報保護方針 facebook instagram. Imcf（アイエムシーエフ、英名：imcf co. Cfo（ファイナンスあり） x 年収800万円以上の転職・求人. 株式会社 アイ・エム・シーの求人は4 件あります。 正社員・バイト・パート求人を探すならハローワークの求人情報。 仕事探しでお困りの方に、社労士による無料個別相談を実施中。.

히토미 8번 출구 価値あるものを、世界中の人々へ。 私達は新たな価値創出に投資を行い、 ブランドを創造し、インターネットを通じて世界中の人々へ届けます。 次世代の日本発グローバルブランドを インターネットを通じて創出することが私達の使命です。 value 大切にすべき. 求人ボックスは、検索結果に掲載する求人を通して対価を得ることがあります。 求人の並び順は、検索条件との関連性、採用企業等が支払う対価、利用者の行動等に基づいて決定されます。 詳細については ヘルプ をご覧ください。. Jp › companies › 1036439808imcf co. 法人概要 株式会社エム・シー・エフ（エムシーエフ）は、2007年12月設立の宇野長継が社長代表を務める福島県いわき市小名浜君ケ塚町14番地8に所在する法人です（法人番号 057）。 最終登記更新は20151005で、新規設立（法人番号登録）を実施しまし. 会社概要を見る 事業概要 business 建造物の安全を確認する検査技術である非破壊検査を手がける株式会社アイ・エム・シー。 住まい・職場、ガス・電気などのライフライン工場、交通車両など、すべての場面で「安心できる日常」に貢献。.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.