Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Port elizabeth tvet college is an institution for tomorrow with a rich illustrious past. Com › link公式リンク｜pcolleの使い方と注意点2025年版pcolle活用ガイド. Pcolleでは1ポイント＝1円で商品と交換できる、 「pポイントシステム」 と呼ばれる独自のポイントシステムがあります。 マイページの「pポイントチャージ」からクレジットカード決済、銀行振込決済であらかじめポイントチャージしておく事で、面倒なカード情報の入力や銀行振込入力を省略. Make all your memories last forever.

Sdjs330

Com › search › books anna claire clouds parker ambrose dante colle whatever you.. Pcolleというサイトで動画を購入しました。ダウンロードに必要なアプリってありますか？スマホのアンドロイドです。 pcolleで購入した動画をダウンロードするためには、特別なアプリは必要ありません。ただし、動画をダウンロードするには、ブラウザを使用してリンクをクリックし..

Seoul Asuna Tits

Il portale del comune di gioia del colle realizzato sul nuovo modello comuni di designers italia, con tutte le informazioni per i cittadini. 購入に関するよくある質問 q：pポイントに有効期限はありますか？ pポイントの有効期限は発行日から180日（180日目の. Common app streamlines college applications for over 1,000 schools, saving time, tracking deadlines, and supporting students, counselors, and recommenders. Pcolle プライバシーポリシー 公式リンク 2024–2026 pcolleの使い方と注意点2025年版pcolle活用ガイド.

Pcolleでは1ポイント＝1円で商品と交換できる、 「pポイントシステム」 と呼ばれる独自のポイントシステムがあります。 マイページの「pポイントチャージ」からクレジットカード決済、銀行振込決済であらかじめポイントチャージしておく事で、面倒なカード情報の入力や銀行振込入力を省略, Make all your memories last forever. Il portale del comune di gioia del colle realizzato sul nuovo modello comuni di designers italia, con tutte le informazioni per i cittadini. 2023年1月の販売者ランキングです。 1位電気羊2位☆すとろべりぃしぇいく☆3位ryusei4位ねんいち5位クリオネ6.

Sana A Story Behind Two Idols

Pcolleは、盗撮動画などを売りたい人と買いたい人が集まる デジタルマーケット です。 販売されている動画はジャンルも多岐に渡りますが、出品者も個人から専門業者まで多岐に渡っています。 そのためコンテンツのクオリティに関しては、まさに 「玉石混交」 と言った感じが否めません。 「ハズレ」 を引いたと言う口コミも見ますが、 他のサイトでは見れない思わぬお宝動画を引いたと多くの動画を購入するリピーターやヘビーユーザーがいることも事実です。 まずは無料会員登録をして 1,600本を超える無料動画 をいろいろ見てみると良いでしょう。 クオリティの高そうな優良出品者がいれば、まずその作品から購入してみるのも良いでしょう。 動画の販売単価も 500円から1万円を超えるものまで 多岐に渡っています。. Port elizabeth tvet college is an institution for tomorrow with a rich illustrious past. Books by pcolle author of shiroutopantei. Pcolle has 3 books on goodreads with 9 ratings, Com › link公式リンク｜pcolleの使い方と注意点2025年版pcolle活用ガイド.

sawtatsu hitomi Pcolles most popular book is shiroutopantei japanese edition. 駐車場代削減術 駐車費用34％削減の秘策 法人の導入としても注目 月間平均で34%（30,080円）の削減が可能であることが明らかになりました。この調査結果は、「pcollection」を活用することで企業や一般家庭が抱える経済的な負担を軽減する一助となることがわかった。 n ews. Find their contact information including current home address, background check reports, and property record on whitepages people search, the most trusted online directory. ポイ活付き駐車場検索アプリ『pcollection』の公式チャンネル pcollectionとは？車でのおでかけ・旅行、ドライブデートにおすすめ無料ポイ活. Il portale del comune di gioia del colle realizzato sul nuovo modello comuni di designers italia, con tutte le informazioni per i cittadini. sissy 사이트

romina palmeri age Pcolle プライバシーポリシー 公式リンク 2024–2026 pcolleの使い方と注意点2025年版pcolle活用ガイド. Com › search › books anna claire clouds parker ambrose dante colle whatever you. Com › category › pcollepcolle｜pcolleの使い方と注意点2025年版pcolle活用ガイド. Pcolle has 3 books on goodreads with 9 ratings. New releases and popular books related to anna claire clouds parker ambrose dante colle whatever you need from simon & schuster. roe406

sizhaiwu Pcolleは、盗撮動画などを売りたい人と買いたい人が集まる デジタルマーケット です。 販売されている動画はジャンルも多岐に渡りますが、出品者も個人から専門業者まで多岐に渡っています。 そのためコンテンツのクオリティに関しては、まさに 「玉石混交」 と言った感じが否めません。 「ハズレ」 を引いたと言う口コミも見ますが、 他のサイトでは見れない思わぬお宝動画を引いたと多くの動画を購入するリピーターやヘビーユーザーがいることも事実です。 まずは無料会員登録をして 1,600本を超える無料動画 をいろいろ見てみると良いでしょう。 クオリティの高そうな優良出品者がいれば、まずその作品から購入してみるのも良いでしょう。 動画の販売単価も 500円から1万円を超えるものまで 多岐に渡っています。. Common app streamlines college applications for over 1,000 schools, saving time, tracking deadlines, and supporting students, counselors, and recommenders. We focus on developing people today to enable them to face the challenges of tomorrow by equipping them with relevant practical skills to enable them to attain their dreams and aspirations. 結論から言いますと、 彼女は1人で来ることになります。 というワケでインタビュー当日を迎えまして、待ち合わせ場所に向かう事になりました！ 一目見て間違いなくこの娘だ！ と確信しましたね。. Stefan pieter colle, age 59, lives in denver, nc. rkappachino

saerock 곤장 2023年1月の販売者ランキングです。 1位電気羊2位☆すとろべりぃしぇいく☆3位ryusei4位ねんいち5位クリオネ6. このページではpcolleの購入・支払い方法について解説しています。 『pcolle』公式サイトを見る 購入代金はクレジ. Pcolles most popular book is shiroutopantei japanese edition. Create holiday greetings, wedding invitations, birthday cards, and more. This underpins our vision of being the preferred provider of technical and vocational education and training tvet.

retsu sotwe Com › login_pagepiccollage. This underpins our vision of being the preferred provider of technical and vocational education and training tvet. ニューヨーク体育大学のオリジナルのコンテンツ販売はpcolleでのみになります。 おそらく短期間の販売になると思うので気になるコンテンツは即決をお勧めします。 再販aiリマスターair_0445_03 大学生の黄昏時大会2017 目の前に長身スレンダーハイジャンパーのお尻が！ 再販aiリマスターair_0528_03 スパッツだからこそエ い！ デカすぎる割れ目に食い込んで形が露わに！ 再販aiリマスターair_0528_04 よく見ると・・・透けてないか？ 大胆にブルマをめくったり挑発されすぎて好きになってしまう. We focus on developing people today to enable them to face the challenges of tomorrow by equipping them with relevant practical skills to enable them to attain their dreams and aspirations. Pcolle（ピーコレ）でのお買い物の決済には、クレジットカードか銀行振込が選択可能ですが、利便性から考えてもクレジットカードを利用することになります。 ただ、アダルト系な商品もあるサイトなので、初めて利用する方などは危険性がないか？ と心配されるでしょう。 私自身は2018年12月からクレジット決済でpcolleの動画を購入していますが一度もトラブルにあったことはありません。 それでも念の為の安全策として、私がやっている方法はクレジットカード本体のカード番号を決済に使わず、 バーチャルカード もしくは プリペイドカード といった限度額を小さくした 子カード を決済に使っています。 この子カード番号を使って決済することにより、万が一のトラブルにあっても被害額を最小にする事が可能です。.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.