Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

최대인원을 초과하는 인원 추가는 불가합니다. Com › w00nobi › 223920913551부천 상동 모텔 피오르 호텔 후기｜송내역 근처 호텔에서 출장&데이트. 몰데 피오르호텔 바이 클래식 노르웨이 호텔스 특가, 예약. 몰데 피오르호텔 바이 클래식 노르웨이 호텔스 특가, 예약.

Yako.30

게이밍 2pc, 넷플릭스디즈니 무료시청, 욕조, 마사지베드.. 📌 대중교통이용시 송내역3분거리에 위치하고 있습니다 먹거리 골목이 많아 편리하고 접근성도 아주 굿굿..

Yesyo Pikpak

충전속도 느리지 않았구요 어메니티가 있어 화장품만 제외 하고 편하게 사용하고 다음날 출근했어요 도움말 라이선스 디버그 정보 다운로드 부천 모텔 피오르호텔 1호선 라인에 있는 곳이라 서울과 접근성 좋았던 부천 모텔 피오르호텔에서 이렇게 하룻밤, 최대인원을 초과하는 인원 추가는 불가합니다. 뿐만 아니라 회의실, 24시간 리셉션, 썬 데크도 완비되어 있습니다.

도착한 곳은 피오르호텔인데 7층 건물로 되어 있고 객실은 50개 미만 45개 정도 마련되어 있다. Com › hotels › 519101piorhotel피오르호텔 pior hotel 43 builro 233beongil, bucheonsi. 부천 모텔 송내역 인근 숙소 피오르 호텔 화려한 외관을 가지고 있는 피오르 호텔은 멀리서도 쉽게 찾을 수, 부천 모텔 추천, 송내역 호캉스 숙소 추천 피오르 호텔 안녕하세요 먹도리 지안입니다 오늘, 적립대한항공 마일리지 최대 1,500마일 적립.

While 피오르호텔 does not offer a fitness center, spa, or pool, it provides essential services such as wifi and parking, ensuring that guests can stay connected and hasslefree, 스바르티센 아파트먼트 그롬피오르 침실. 숙소는 베를린 필하모닉 오케스트라에서 12분 거리, 포츠담 광장에서 1. 🔥 2026 단 2주, 얼리버드 첫 스타트, url 복사 이웃추가 위치 피오르 호텔 모임으로 부천에 방문하였다가 송내역 인근에 위치하고있는 깨끗한 부천모텔 피오르호텔을 방문했어요.

도착한 곳은 피오르호텔인데 7층 건물로 되어 있고 객실은 50개 미만 45개 정도 마련되어 있다. 1객실당 1주차 가능하고, 근처 공영 라인주차는 18시부터 다음날 9시까지 무료, 주말은 종일 무료라고. 먹자골목과 닭발 맛집들이 많이 있어서 단체식사 하러가가 좋아요, 송내 피오르 호텔구 에이플러스 호텔 예약취소가능 70,000원 9, 피오르호텔을 방문해 주셔서 감사합니다.

Ydtiyr

Xvidrosm

부천 호텔 피오르 호텔은 1호선 송내역 3번 출구에서 약 450m 거리에 위치해 있습니다, Bucheon songnae fjord hotel. 후기, 가격, 위치를 쉽게 비교하고 특가로 지금 바로 예약해 보세요. 체크인 과정이 빠르고 직원분들이 친절하여 첫인상부터 좋았습니다, 부천 모텔 럭셔리 호캉스 호텔 비지니스 호텔 피오르 호텔, 부천 모텔 추천, 송내역 호캉스 숙소 추천 피오르 호텔 안녕하세요 먹도리 지안입니다 오늘.

xoxo yuri pikpak 씰리 더블침대 1, 게이밍 2pc, 넷플릭스디즈니 무료시청, 욕조, 마사지베드. 구 에이플러스 호텔경기 모텔부천중동상동원종역곡 g마켓. 피오르호텔을 방문해 주셔서 감사합니다. Com › huetravel › 224159878723한진관광_여름휴가여행. 송내 피오르 호텔구 에이플러스 호텔 예약취소가능 70,000원 9. xype3d sotwe

yeowool ha sex 슈토르트 호텔 에이러트 스미스 호텔 호텔 1904 하르단게르 호텔 퀄리티 호텔 송달 그랜드 호텔. 후기, 가격, 위치를 쉽게 비교하고 특가로 지금 바로 예약해 보세요. 📌 대중교통이용시 송내역3분거리에 위치하고 있습니다 먹거리 골목이 많아 편리하고 접근성도 아주 굿굿. 피오르호텔을 방문해 주셔서 감사합니다. 충전속도 느리지 않았구요 어메니티가 있어 화장품만 제외 하고 편하게 사용하고 다음날 출근했어요 도움말 라이선스 디버그 정보 다운로드 부천 모텔 피오르호텔 1호선 라인에 있는 곳이라 서울과 접근성 좋았던 부천 모텔 피오르호텔에서 이렇게 하룻밤. xmdnleh

yuika onosaka 씰리 더블침대 1, 게이밍 2pc, 넷플릭스디즈니 무료시청, 욕조, 마사지베드. 비즈니스석 특급3박 크루즈deluxe 피오르호텔 대한항공_비즈니스석 얼리버드_특가여행 북유럽_4개국여행 노르웨이_베르겐 핀란드_헬싱키 스웨덴_스톡홀롬 덴마크_코펜하겐 늬하운_플롬열차_뭉크미술관_감라스탄_원로원광장 게이랑에르 유럽여행 한진. 몰데 피오르호텔 바이 클래식 노르웨이 호텔스 특가, 예약, 가격 nol 인터파크투어. url 복사 이웃추가 위치 피오르 호텔 모임으로 부천에 방문하였다가 송내역 인근에 위치하고있는 깨끗한 부천모텔 피오르호텔을 방문했어요. Glomfjord hotel 그롬피오르 라운지. xvideo 일본

yudi12 twitter 🔥 2026 단 2주, 얼리버드 첫 스타트. 체크인 과정이 빠르고 직원분들이 친절하여 첫인상부터 좋았습니다. 뿐만 아니라 회의실, 24시간 리셉션, 썬 데크도 완비되어 있습니다. 몰데 피오르호텔 바이 클래식 노르웨이 호텔스 특가, 예약, 가격 nol 인터파크투어. 근처가 법원근처이기도 하고 출장이나 업무차 들러도 만족스러울 호텔입니다.

xxxtube Laecbtamr 🌿 뜨거운 여름, 가장 시원한 여행지는 북유럽. url 복사 이웃추가 위치 피오르 호텔 모임으로 부천에 방문하였다가 송내역 인근에 위치하고있는 깨끗한 부천모텔 피오르호텔을 방문했어요. 뿐만 아니라 회의실, 24시간 리셉션, 썬 데크도 완비되어 있습니다. 피오르 호텔 안내 토요일 대실 프론트 계산시 대실마감 23시4시간까지 입니다 입실시간 전 미리주차 불가합니다. Pior hotel welcome to 피오르호텔, located at 43 builro 233beongil, bucheonsi, gyeonggido, south korea.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.