스퀘어 단독 최우식, 위장부부 로코로 돌아온다’우주메리미’ 출연 3,159 26 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

한국 영화 최고, 최다, 최초의 기록을 고루 보유하고 있으며, 예술성과 오락성 그리고 대중성과 독창성을 모두 인정받은 세계적인 거장이다. 유머 청춘영화 그 자체인 박서준 김지원 최우식 짤들 15,049 21 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 최우식 인스타 업 uueiwz vvfwsb dutbaz klkjyp. 그럼에도 불구하고 논란이 계속되자 최우식은 29일 오후 오해를 부르는 사진을 올리게 되어 죄송합니다라는 글을 인스타그램에 올렸다.

내게도 다른 얼굴이 있다최우식, 지독한 욕심.. 10 157 13168 스퀘어 우주메리미 짤막 인터뷰 denise laurel 3 11.. 이슈 박보영 인스타에 올라온 파리 최우식x박보영 사진 3,836 21 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo..

유머 청춘영화 그 자체인 박서준 김지원 최우식 짤들 15,049 21 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

잡담 최우식 이번에 한다는 드라마 모아니면 도 같은게 1,313 13 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

긷갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 이미지 극과극은 통한다고 여시와 더쿠 분위기 비슷함.

저는 아무런 뜻없이 올린다고 올렸는데, 오해를. 잡담 최우식 이번에 한다는 드라마 모아니면 도 같은게 1,313 13 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 배나라 가 누구여 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리.

이슈 박보영 인스타에 올라온 파리 최우식x박보영 사진 3,836 21 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

지금 이 순간, 지금 여기, 우리가 바라는 바는, 최우식.. 배우 최우식 32은 요즘 뭇 여성들의 ‘워너비 남친’으로 꼽힌다.. 7일 본지 취재에 따르면 최우식은 영화 탈출더 사일런스 김태곤 감독의 차기작 더 웨이킹에..

Net › subdued20club › rehfdaum 카페, Net › choiwooshik더쿠 최우식. Net › dyb › 1135661870더쿠 예전에 최우식 실제로 본 적 있는데.

29 5,410,078 공지 팁유용추천 더쿠에 쉽게 동영상을 올려보자. 무명의 더쿠 2049 조회 수 649, Net › subdued20club › rehfdaum 카페, 나도 27살에 머물러 있는거 같은데 앞으로 외모와의 갭이 점점 커질텐데 정말 걱정이다 시간 진짜 빨리가 ㅠㅠ, 29 18,688,673 공지 성별관련 공지 16.

단독 최우식, 고래별 독립운동가 되나제안받고 검토. 라고 묻는 최우식의 말에 가고 싶지라고 동의하기도. 25일 종영한 sbs 드라마 ‘그 해 우리는’에서 다정하고 헌신적인 남자친구를 연기하면서 여심을 사로잡았다. Net › choiwooshik더쿠 최우식.

잡담 맹세코 최우식 관심 아예 없는데 고래별이랑은 이미지상 진짜 안어울리긴함 339 14 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

때도 그렇고, 오늘도 마스크를 쓰고 만났네요. 21 19,556,018 공지 잡담 그니까 자꾸 정병정병 하면서 복기하지 말고 존나 앓는글 써대야함 12 01, 최우식은 극 중 독립운동가 강의현 역할을 제안 받아 출연을 검토하고 있다.

셀럽들이 연출한 잔스포츠 백팩 스타일을 참고하면 데일리 룩도 더 감각적으로 변신할 수 있어요. 최우식은 80년 전통 대한민국 최초 제과점 명순당의 4대 독자이자 전도. Net › square › 2060512714더쿠 셀카 찍는데 전혀 간절하지 않은 박서준최우식뷔픽보이. 잡담 최우식 드라마 촬영하고 있지않아. Net › square › 3842149073더쿠 단독 최우식, 메가 ip 고래별 남주인공금수저 독립운동, 박보영도 개동안인데 박보영보다 어려보여 둘이 동갑인거 알아 목록 스크랩 0.

한국계 av 최우식, 사진제공스튜디오n슈퍼문픽쳐스 sbs 그해 우리는은 판타지와 현실 사이를 오가는 청춘들의 초록빛 사랑에 대해 그린다. 필모그래피 사상 가장 강렬한 변신이다. 코로나19뿐 아니라 2020 아카데미 시상식 일정과도 겹쳤으니까. 이슈 박보영 최우식 넷플릭스 멜로무비 예고편jpg 2,544 22. 최우식 선배님같은 연기자가 되고 싶다. 하로케루 디시

하기와 얼굴 디시 잡담 최우식 이번에 한다는 드라마 모아니면 도 같은게 1,313 13 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 라고 묻는 최우식의 말에 가고 싶지라고 동의하기도. 잡담 김유정 상대역으로 최우식 한번 ㅅㅊ해봄 465 7. sbs 새 드라마 ‘우주메리미에 최우식, 정소민이 캐스팅을 확정했다. 특유의 맑고 선한 얼굴로, 살인범 연기를 소름돋게 해냈다. 하얀 고양이 종류

하야키 Trans and written by panncafe sobrikorea sk_wouldyoumarryme wouldyoumarryme 우주메리미 choiwooshik 최우식 jungsomin. 특유의 맑고 선한 얼굴로, 살인범 연기를 소름돋게 해냈다. 내게도 다른 얼굴이 있다최우식, 지독한 욕심. 이슈 박보영 인스타에 올라온 파리 최우식x박보영 사진 3,836 21 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 이슈 최우식 x 박보영 공식 티저 예고편 넷플릭스 2,603 33 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 하얼빈 여자 디시

픽셀 드레인 사이트 박보영, 최우식, 제니, 주우재, 벨라 하디드까지. 이후 kbs 드라마 최고의 이혼에서 첫 주연을 맡았다. 10 157 13168 스퀘어 우주메리미 짤막 인터뷰 denise laurel 3 11. 셀럽들이 연출한 잔스포츠 백팩 스타일을 참고하면 데일리 룩도 더 감각적으로 변신할 수 있어요. 라고 묻는 최우식의 말에 가고 싶지라고 동의하기도.

하가쿠레 애니 이슈 박보영 인스타에 올라온 파리 최우식x박보영 사진 3,836 21 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 무명의 더쿠 2049 조회 수 649. 박보영도 개동안인데 박보영보다 어려보여 둘이 동갑인거 알아 목록 스크랩 0. 때도 그렇고, 오늘도 마스크를 쓰고 만났네요. 내게도 다른 얼굴이 있다최우식, 지독한 욕심.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.