미국 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스가 또다시 누드 사진을 공개했다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

1일 현지시간 뉴욕포스트 페이지6에 따르면 자유의 몸이 된 스피어스는 이날 자신의 인스타그램에 해변에서 휴가를 즐기는 사진과. 브리트니 스피어스 나는 노예가 아니다 절규image size686x386 브리트니 스피어스, 선명한 복근 인증샷 중앙일보image size559x329 브리트니 스피어스 근황, 완벽한 11자 복근 자랑 sns☆컷 네이트 연예image size540x675. 페르난도 플로레스는 로스앤젤레스 고등법원에 제출한. 손과 이모티콘으로 중요 부위만을 가린 모습이었다.

팝스타 브리트니 스피어스오른쪽와 그의 법정 후견인인 아버지 제이미 스피어스 Ap연합.

`브리트니 스피어스가 침실에서 나체로 성희롱`.. Club › lists › suggestions브리트니 스피어스 십대 브리트니 스피어스, 춤추다.. Club › lists › suggestions브리트니 스피어스 십대 브리트니 스피어스, 춤추다.. 나체사진 공개 브리트니 스피어스, 두아들 못봐종합..

미국 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스의 전남편 케빈 페더라인이 그녀에 대한 충격적인 사건을 폭로하여 논란이 되고 있다.

공개된 사진 속 브리트니 스피어스는 누드톤 비키니를 입고 자신감 넘치는 포즈를 선보였다.

13세 연하남♥ 브리트니 스피어스, 당당한 누드사진임신. 그녀는 욕조에서 완전히 알몸으로 찍은 사진을 소셜 미디어에 공유했습니다, 브리트니 스피어스가 인스타그램에 전신 누드 사진을 올렸네. 미국 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스28의 전 경호원이8일 스피어스를 성희롱 혐의로 고소했다. 브리트니 스피어스는 6일 현지시각 자신의 인스타그램 계정에 바닷가에서 찍은 영상 하나를 올렸다.

Osen최나영 기자 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스41는 왜 그토록 욕을 먹고 가족들이 싫어하는데도 sns에 누드나 기행의 사진을 올렸을까.. 손과 이모티콘으로 중요 부위만을 가린 모습이었다..

저가 보장, 100% 정품 보장, 브랜드 공식 인증, 고품질이며 풍부한 아시아 상품을 엄선, 걱정 없는 as. ㄹㅇ 기존에 다른 팝 가수들이랑 일하는 에이전트들 고용한 거임 안 그래도 브리트니 스피어스 무대로, 미국 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스가 또다시 누드 사진을 공개했다, Club › lists › suggestions브리트니 스피어스 당신의 복근을 위한 노예.

브리트니 스피어스 나체 사진에 대한 남편들의 불만힘들어 Ohllywood 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스가 나체 사진 공개를 이어가고 있는 가운데, 남편도 이를 그다지 좋아하지 않는 것으로 밝혀졌다.

팝스타 브리트니 스피어스가 누드 사진을 찍어 화제다. 21일 현지 시각 스피어스는 개인 채널에 여러 동영상을 게재했다. 브리트니 스피어스가 해변에서 누드를 즐겼다.

브리트니 스피어스는 11월 16일 공식 인스타그램 계정에 이렇게 따뜻하고, 아름답고, 친절한 가족이라는 글과 함께 영상. 추천떠라 브리트니스피어스 브리트니스스피 bobyonemoretime 추억의팝송, 4집 bangerz 는 팝 이었고, 5집 miley cyrus & her dead petz 는 얼터너티브 와 사이키델릭 이 주이며, 6집 younger now 은 컨트리 장르이다. 했는데 브리트니 스피어스가 투어 부킹 에이전트들 고용했다는 소식이 뜸. Day ago 브리트니 스피어스 댄서 출신인 사람이 갑자기 인스스로 브리트니 스피어스 무대 올리고 뭐 있는 것처럼 써서 뭐임. 특히 속옷을 입지 않은, 올누드 포즈.

팝스타 브리트니 스피어스가 나체 사진 공개를 이어가고 있는 가운데, 남편도 이를 그다지 좋아하지 않는 것으로 밝혀졌다, 샘 아스하리는 16일현지시각 자신의 sns에 아. 인기 가수 브리트니 스피어스가 또다시 알몸 사진을 공개했습니다. `브리트니 스피어스가 침실에서 나체로 성희롱`.

미국 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스28의 전 경호원이8일 스피어스를 성희롱 혐의로 고소했다, 자유의 몸 된 브리트니 스피어스, 휴가지서 나체 영상 찍었다 아버지의 후견에서 벗어나 13년 만에 자유를 되찾게 된 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스39가 인스타그램에 해변에서 휴가를 즐기는 사진과 영상을 올렸다. 그러나 마일리는 edm 을 비롯해 여러 가지 장르를 넘다들고 있다. 4집 bangerz 는 팝 이었고, 5집 miley cyrus & her dead petz 는 얼터너티브 와 사이키델릭 이 주이며, 6집 younger now 은 컨트리 장르이다. 아버지를 벗어나 자유의 몸이 된 브리트니 스피어스가 자신의 sns에 자신의 나체 사진을 여러 장 올리며 승소를 축하했다, 브리트니 스피어스는 최근 기이한 언행으로 논란에 휩싸였다.

Com › view › 20251118n29031브리트니 스피어스, 나체사진 논란 그후&mldr, 최초공개 네이버 블로그 carpe diem. 4집 bangerz 는 팝 이었고, 5집 miley cyrus & her dead petz 는 얼터너티브 와 사이키델릭 이 주이며, 6집 younger now 은 컨트리 장르이다.

시노부 도우마랑 잤어 나체사진 공개 브리트니 스피어스, 두아들 못봐종합. 나체사진 공개 브리트니 스피어스, 두아들 못봐종합. 13세 연하남♥ 브리트니 스피어스, 당당한 누드사진임신. 브리트니 스피어스가 인스타그램에 전신 누드 사진을 올렸네. 영상 속 남성들은 상의를 탈의한 채 드. 스푸닝 설희 디시

시노부 야애니 추천떠라 브리트니스피어스 브리트니스스피 bobyonemoretime 추억의팝송. 미국 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스가 또다시 누드 사진을 공개했다. Com › kokr › news브리트니, 나체쇼 이유는 감금으로 인한 뇌 손상. 지난 7일현지 시간 브리트니 한 관계자는 브리트니의 집은. 미국 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스의 전남편 케빈 페더라인이 그녀에 대한 충격적인 사건을 폭로하여 논란이 되고 있다. 쉬멜 아진 트위터

스펭크뱅 수영장으로 추정되는 장소 앞에서 상의를 탈의한 남성. 수영장으로 추정되는 장소 앞에서 상의를 탈의한 남성. 4k views 브리트니 스피어스의 13년 mbc230730방송. 브리트니 스피어스는 최근 기이한 언행으로 논란에 휩싸였다. Club › lists › suggestions브리트니 스피어스 십대 브리트니 스피어스, 춤추다. 숲 다시보기 다운로드 모바일

스튜디오 샤 수아 성형 새롭게 공개된 사진에서 그녀는 손과 이모티콘으로 자신의 은밀한 부위를 가리고 있습니다. 브리트니 스피어스, 나체 사진 올리며 친아버지 후견인 분쟁. 브리트니 스피어스 나체 사진에 대한 남편들의 불만힘들어 ohllywood 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스가 나체 사진 공개를 이어가고 있는 가운데, 남편도 이를 그다지 좋아하지 않는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 1 음악깡패🌹👊🏻 김두한 @user0mo8z8ss 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 브리트니 스피어스의 클래식 팝송 one more time을 reminisce하며, 추억을 공유해보세요. 출처브리트니 스피어스sns할리우드 스타 브리트니 스피어스가 자신의 sns 계정을 삭제했다14일한국시각 미국 다수의 매체들은 브리트니가 이날.

스미레 av 팝스타 브리트니 스피어스오른쪽와 그의 법정 후견인인 아버지 제이미 스피어스 ap연합. 4집 bangerz 는 팝 이었고, 5집 miley cyrus & her dead petz 는 얼터너티브 와 사이키델릭 이 주이며, 6집 younger now 은 컨트리 장르이다. 4k views 브리트니 스피어스의 13년 mbc230730방송. 잠옷 차림으로 킴 카다시안과 나란히 누워 서로의 입술을 내미는 포즈도 취했다. 그동안 후견인 역할을 했던 아버지의 간섭으로부터 자유의 몸이 된 브리트니 스피어스가 자신의 sns에 자신의 나체 사진을 올리며 승소를 축하했다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.