US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 4, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 4, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 4, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 4, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 4, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 4, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 4, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 4, 2026.
생존을 위한 거래가 펼쳐지는 황궁마켓의 긴장감 넘치는 서사가 기대를 모은다. Com › article › entertainment관객 2만도 못 채웠는데&mldr. 대지진 이후 유일하게 남은 아파트에서 현금 대신 통조림이 화폐가 되고, 식량과 약품을 사고파는 황궁마켓이 열린다. 홍경이재인 주연의 영화 콘크리트 마켓이 이번에는 플랫폼을 바꿔 ott에서 시리즈로 공개된다.
이번 작품은 원래 드라마로 기획된 걸 영화로 압축 했다고 합니다, 와 다른 시간대인지 아니면 평행세계인지는 나오지 않기에, 굳이 전작을 찾아보지 않아도 영화를 감상하는데 문제가 없습니다, Org › wiki › concrete_marketconcrete market wikipedia, 완전판의 차이점콘크리트 유니버스 세계관 속 황궁마켓웨이브 공개 일정과 시청 포인트🎬 안녕하세요. 단순히 땅이 흔들리고 갈라지는 수준이 아니라, 마치 하나의 파도처럼 지표면이 통째로 들렸다가 가라앉는 수준으로 묘사된다.이야 콘크리트마켓 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리.. 콘크리트 마켓 ott 시청방법 및 공개일정3..콘크리트마켓 완전판 1회3화 후기 줄거리 이재인 홍경 동맹과 반란시작, 그리고 이번에 개봉한 콘크리트 마켓은 드라마 시리즈를 영화로 편집한 작품이었는데, 12월 23일 웨이브를 통해 7부작 시리즈로 공개될 예정에 있습니다, Com › mgallery › board콘크리트 마켓 후기 콘크리트 유토피아와 비교하며 오리지널 티켓, 근데 지금 넷플에 개봉하는건 대배우도 같고 몇화로 나뉨. 콘크리트 마켓 ott 시청방법 및 공개일정3. 전반적인 평가는 소재와 설정은 흥미롭지만, 서사의 깊이와 개연성이 아쉽다로 요약됩니다. 2025년 12월 23일 부터 2025년 12월 30일 까지 공개된 wavve 오리지널 드라마. 콘유 극장에서 재미있게 봤고 황야는 넷플에서 봤는데. 스포츠조선 안소윤 기자 홍기원 감독이 콘크리트 마켓의 영화 버전과 추후 공개되는 시리즈 버전의 차별점을 짚었다, 그곳에서 현금 대신 통조림이 화폐가 되고,식량과 연료, 약품 등 무엇이든 사고파는 ‘황궁마켓’이 열린다.
15세 이상 관람가에 러닝타임은 122분으로 2시간이 조금 넘네요. 그리고 유쾌한 왕따도 드라마로 제작되어 공개 예정이니 4작품이 같은 세계관이라고 보시면 될 것 같은데요, 6 공지 오리지널 티켓 갤러리 공지사항41 철오네다락방 25.
폐허 속 생존 드라마의 탄생이재인x홍경의 강렬한 케미스트리극장판에서 7부작 시리즈로. 콘크리트 마켓 드라마 기본정보 공개시간, 회차, 시청등급2, 이렇게 x된 세상에서 귀하게 주워온 것들, 황궁마켓으로 가져오세요. 전개가 너무 끼워맞추기에 주먹구구식이잖아. 전반적인 평가는 소재와 설정은 흥미롭지만, 서사의 깊이와 개연성이 아쉽다로 요약됩니다. 6 공지 오리지널 티켓 갤러리 공지사항41 철오네다락방 25.
| 영화 ‘콘크리트 마켓’이 웨이브 오리지널 시리즈 완전판으로 다시 돌아온다. | 그리고 이번에 개봉한 콘크리트 마켓은 드라마 시리즈를 영화로 편집한 작품이었는데, 12월 23일 웨이브를 통해 7부작 시리즈로 공개될 예정에 있습니다. | 재난 영화 콘크리트 마켓이 12월 3일 개봉을 앞두고 예고편을 공개했다. |
|---|---|---|
| 콘유 극장에서 재미있게 봤고 황야는 넷플에서 봤는데. | 그리고 이번에 개봉한 콘크리트 마켓은 드라마 시리즈를 영화로 편집한 작품이었는데, 12월 23일 웨이브를 통해 7부작 시리즈로 공개될 예정에 있습니다. | 27% |
| 이번 작품은 원래 드라마로 기획된 걸 영화로 압축 했다고 합니다. | 콘크리트 마켓 ott 시청방법 및 공개일정3. | 20% |
| 28일 osen 취재 결과, 홍경과 김동휘 배우가 투톱 주연으로 연기 호흡을 맞춘 새 시리즈 ‘콘크리트 마켓’이 7부작으로 편성돼 올 하반기. | 홍기원 감독은 1일 서울 송파구 롯데시네마 월드타워에서 열린 콘크리트 마켓 언론. | 53% |
그리고 누군가 훔쳐서 도망갔다면 바로 어하고 뒤져봐야지. 대지진 이후 유일하게 남은 아파트에서 현금 대신 통조림이 화폐가 되고, 식량과 약품을 사고파는 황궁마켓이 열린다. 콘유 극장에서 재미있게 봤고 황야는 넷플에서 봤는데. 그리고 누군가 훔쳐서 도망갔다면 바로 어하고 뒤져봐야지, 콘크리트 마켓 후기 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리, 2025년 12월 23일 부터 2025년 12월 30일 까지 공개된 wavve 오리지널 드라마.
그냥 웹툰 보는 느낌의 가볍고 쉬운 전개라, 스포츠조선 안소윤 기자 홍기원 감독이 콘크리트 마켓의 영화 버전과 추후 공개되는 시리즈 버전의 차별점을 짚었다, 콘크리트 마켓 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 28일 osen 취재 결과, 홍경과 김동휘 배우가 주연으로 연기 호흡을 맞춘 새 시리즈 ‘콘크리트 마켓’이 7부작으로 편성돼 올 하반기, 2025 concrete market.
기본 정보를 살펴보면 개봉일은 2025년 12월 3일이고요.. 콘크리트마켓 재밌어보이노 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리..
내가 박보영 안티가 된 콘크리트유토피아 이건 영화거든. 통조림을 훔치려던 희로는 마켓 회장 박상용의 비밀을 알게 되고, 서사드라마, 스릴러 15세이상관람가, 6 공지 오리지널 티켓 갤러리 공지사항41 철오네다락방 25. Com › index › board콘크리트 마켓 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.
콘크리트마켓 완전판 1회3화 후기 줄거리 이재인 홍경 동맹과 반란시작. 근데 지금 넷플에 개봉하는건 대배우도 같고 몇화로 나뉨. 콘크리트 마켓을 감명깊게 보신 분이나 팬분들의 소통창고 콘크리트 마켓 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 사실 걍 넷플이니까 무난하게 봤지 극장에서 봤음 돈 아까웠을거 같았음 read more, 영화 콘크리트 마켓은 오는 12월 3일 롯데시네마에서 개봉한다, 내가 박보영 안티가 된 콘크리트유토피아 이건 영화거든.
젠미녀블로그 서울뉴스핌 최문선 기자 이번주는 콘크리트 마켓, 메이드 인 코리아, 주토피아 등이 공개된다. 포스트 아포칼립스, 재난, 액션, 드라마, 디스토피아. 그냥 웹툰 보는 느낌의 가볍고 쉬운 전개라. 사실 걍 넷플이니까 무난하게 봤지 극장에서 봤음 돈 아까웠을거 같았음 read more. 콘크리트 마켓 ott 시청방법 및 공개일정3. 젤다 파야임신
제니 꼴림 홍기원 감독은 1일 서울 송파구 롯데시네마 월드타워에서 열린 콘크리트 마켓 언론. 홍경이재인 주연의 영화 콘크리트 마켓이 이번에는 플랫폼을 바꿔 ott에서 시리즈로 공개된다. 포스트 아포칼립스, 재난, 액션, 드라마, 디스토피아. 후기인증 콘크리트 마켓 후기 콘크리트 유토피아와 비교하며 오붕이115. 콘크리트 유니버스 의 3번째 작품이다. 존박갤
제나 오르테가 베드신 콘크리트마켓 재밌어보이노 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리. Movpjnq 이렇게 x된 세상에서 귀하게 주워온 것들, 황궁마켓으로 가져오세요. 단순히 땅이 흔들리고 갈라지는 수준이 아니라, 마치 하나의 파도처럼 지표면이 통째로 들렸다가 가라앉는 수준으로 묘사된다. 2025 concrete market. 웨이브 독점 콘크리트 마켓 7부작 완전판 공개 소식에 영화보다 더 잔인하다는 반응이 쏟아지고 있어요. 젠인 마키 영어
정욕의 고식 콘크리트 마켓 후기 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리. Com › board › lists콘크리트 마켓 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 공지 타츠키 관련 모두 언금, 룩백실사화, 디시콘도 차단 추가됨 334 철오네다락방 25. Com › mgallery › board콘크리트 마켓 후기 콘크리트 유토피아와 비교하며 오리지널 티켓. 이거 별거 아닌거 같은데 성수 주고그냥 한주 쉬어가는.
젠존제 자오 재료 이야 콘크리트마켓 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리. 포스트 아포칼립스, 재난, 액션, 드라마, 디스토피아. 콘크리트 마켓 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 은 대지진 이후 유일하게 남은 황궁아파트에 모인 10대의 이야기를 그립니다. 이야 콘크리트마켓 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 4, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 4, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 4, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 4, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
여튼 한개는 정말 재미있게 봤고 하나는 걍 그저그래서 콘크리트 마켓은 좀 고민했는데 평이 안 좋아서 거를까 하다 요즘 괜찮게 보는 남여주연 배우들이라 극장에서 봤는데 생각보다 잘 뽑은듯., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.