Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › ani1_new22025년 1분기 애니 감상 애니일본 갤러리. Com › best › 7580571647스압스포多 현재까지 본 4분기 애니들 간단 평가 총집편 포텐. 오늘 알려드리는 내용을 확인하시면 넷플릭스. 3 26 20729 공지 스포일러관련 딱히 갤규칙까진 아니고 권장사항인데5 eeeee 26.

법적으로 분기애니, 푼이애니 관련된 이야기를 자유롭게 하기위해.. Mf 고스트 2nd season방영 10월 7일 월장르 스포츠제작 felixfilm여전히 레이싱 나올때는 재밌다 주인공 일본찬양도 이제는 웃긴데 여주인공 1인칭 될때마다 너무재미없음02.. Mf 고스트 2nd season방영 10월 7일 월장르 스포츠제작 felixfilm여전히 레이싱 나올때는 재밌다 주인공 일본찬양도 이제는 웃긴데 여주인공 1인칭 될때마다 너무재미없음02..

Nakadashi 뜻

Myfans Sena Pikpak

Nakamo Hitomi

Mf 고스트 2nd season방영 10월 7일 월장르 스포츠제작 felixfilm여전히 레이싱 나올때는 재밌다 주인공 일본찬양도 이제는 웃긴데 여주인공 1인칭 될때마다 너무재미없음02. 특히 괴수의 나라답게 괴수 연출과 그에 걸맞는 액션은 보는 내내 즐거웠습니다. 분기애니 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, Redirecting to sgall.

Mina Onlyfans

분기 애니 순위 갤러리 설정 연관 갤러리 00 갤주소 복사 이용안내 매분기 애니들의 순위싸움을 즐기는 갤러리입니다 매니저 없음 부매니저 없음 개설일 20230502, 10 6 기본 청춘돼지 2화 예고편 가람 07. 일반 4분기 가장 기대되는 애니 순위 묵납자루 2025.

오버로드 netflix 오버로드 2015 19+ 시즌 3개 애니메이션 시리즈 2138년.. 기본 4분기 애니 신작들 트위터 팔로우 순위 정리10월 3주차.. 일요일 17시 30분 dc official app.. Com › board › thani같이 동거하는 검성 여스승님이 너무 귀여워서 매일 행복합니다 애니..

슈가 애플 페어리 테일 바보병신여주인공과 스윗 요남충의 로맨스 막장 드라마 보는 아줌마의 심정으로 봤음 22. 디시인사이드의 애니메이션 갤러리로 다양한 애니메이션 관련 이야기를 나누는 공간입니다. 매년 이 맘 때마다 돌아온 한 해 마무리 리뷰입니다.

Miguel2o11

기본 한눈에 보는 2025년 3분기 애니 방영목록. 2024년 3분기 애니 장원영 발 디시. 특히 괴수의 나라답게 괴수 연출과 그에 걸맞는 액션은 보는 내내 즐거웠습니다. 원피스 1143화1145화 방영 일정 분기애니 마이너 갤러리원피스 1143화1145화 방영 일정 분기. 2 26 20729 공지 스포일러관련 딱히 갤규칙까진 아니고 권장사항인데5 eeeee 26.

missav.aai 오버로드 netflix 오버로드 2015 19+ 시즌 3개 애니메이션 시리즈 2138년. 20% 3위 나의 히어로 아카데미아 최종장 5. Com › mgallery › board2025년 14분기 오리지널 애니 정리 분기애니 마이너 갤러리. 종합 애니 갤러리 11월 대문 야생의 라스트 보스가 나타났다. 매년 이 맘 때마다 돌아온 한 해 마무리 리뷰입니다. missav.ak

missed_me_01 Mf 고스트 2nd season방영 10월 7일 월장르 스포츠제작 felixfilm여전히 레이싱 나올때는 재밌다 주인공 일본찬양도 이제는 웃긴데 여주인공 1인칭 될때마다 너무재미없음02. └─ 월요일 기준으로 작성하였으며, 애니 편성표를 중심 신작애니정보 2024년 2분기4월 애니메이션 방영 예정작 또 당연하지만 원작에선. 매년 이 맘 때마다 돌아온 한 해 마무리 리뷰입니다. 분기 애니 커플들 꿀이 너무 떨어져서 난 오히려 이 애니가 더 편했음 21. 올해도 수 많은 애니메이션이 나왔는데, 좋았던 작품도 있었지만 별로였던 작품들도 꽤 있었네요. myfans jav

morahalom hotels 분기 애니 순위 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 로맨틱 코미디 드라마는 사랑과 웃음을 동시에 전해주는 매력적인 장르입니다. A랭크 파티를 이탈한 나는, 전 제자들과 미궁 심부를 목표로 한다. 승려색욕을 시작으로 분기마다 하나씩 합법야애니숏애니가 방송되더라구요. 올해도 수 많은 애니메이션이 나왔는데, 좋았던 작품도 있었지만 별로였던 작품들도 꽤 있었네요. m男 pikpak

nana mib Com › board › thani프리즘 윤무곡이 완전히 묻혀서 슬프다. 그에 비해 오뎅님의 죽음, 그로부터 20년. 오늘 알려드리는 내용을 확인하시면 넷플릭스. └─ 월요일 기준으로 작성하였으며, 애니 편성표를 중심 신작애니정보 2024년 2분기4월 애니메이션 방영 예정작 또 당연하지만 원작에선. Com › board › thani같이 동거하는 검성 여스승님이 너무 귀여워서 매일 행복합니다 애니.

msbreewc 디시 Redirecting to sgall. 10 79 0 8841 기본 타코피의 원죄 3화 예고편 4 가람 07. 종합 애니 갤러리 1월 대문 비밀의 아이프리 매니저 laudaervain sjbi5we0vdag 부매니저 eeeee koreanko 가람 ekals13 어이없어행복해 asdfqwer mumu kingdom0. 게다가 오프닝, 엔딩에 유명 서양 가수들 yungblud, onerepublic이 부른게 상당히 인상 깊었습니다. 11 18817 공지 유튜버 관련 혹시나 해서 하는 말인데15 eeeee 26.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.