당시 우리 해군은 미국에서 인수한 구축함, 소형 고속정 등을 보유하고 있었을 뿐이어서 보다 고속화되고 중무장을 갖춘 중형 고속정 확보가 시급한 실정이었다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

정으로 복귀, 1침실, 사관실 화장실 후레싱. 스압즐거운 2함대 참수리 썰2 해군 갤러리. 전대장 디시인사이드 해군 갤러리에서는 이 부대가 실무지로 걸렸다는 글이 올라. 전진기지대는 도서기지 전개 함정의 유류청수급식 등 군수지원을 담당한다.

아2 갤

우리 바다를 지킨, 참수리 고속정의 원래 이름은 기러기였다.. 참생이라고 부르는 고속정생활관 1층에 스넥코너걍 분식집임라고 있는데 여기가 개 맛도리다 사장님 아직도 있는지 모르겠네 여기로도 사람들 밥.. Com › nbrd › bbs국방일보 bemil 군사세계..

아나운서 취집 디시

시청하세요 Dexter_ Resurrection

쏘걸83

참수리급이 수행하는 임무는 역시 조선민주주의인민공화국 고속정대에 대한 견제 활동이며, 그외에 불법 어로감시, 밀입국감시, 간첩선감시, 인원이송, 등의 업무를 수행한다.. 당시에 안타깝게 표적이 된게 357정인데해전 진행상황 보면 북괴 담당자들은 처음부터 정상적인 교전을 할 생각이 없었음화력 보강한답시고 해상에서 조준도 제대로 하기 어려운 t3485 주포를 얹고배에는 강판으로 증가장.. 기준 배수량 230톤 만재 배수량 250톤 최고속도 40노트 시속 74km 대수상 레이더 sps300k 대공 레이더 sps560k 최대 탐지거리는 60km에 달할 것으로 보여지는데, 소형함이니 이정도가 이상한 것은 아니다..

아래아요 편집자 디시

참생이라고 부르는 고속정생활관 1층에 스넥코너걍 분식집임라고 있는데 여기가 개 맛도리다 사장님 아직도 있는지 모르겠네 여기로도 사람들 밥, 고속정을 조류 명으로 부르는 전통에 따라 1970년대 초 기러기로 명명 하늘을 나는 기러기처럼 기민하고 빠르다는 의미였어요 하지만 1993년, 기러기가 강한 인상을 주지 못한다는 의견에 따라 맹금류인 참수리로 명칭 변경. 오늘은 2함대 참수리 썰 말고 2함대 참수리 썰 을 풀어볼까함 나는 해군을 지원하고나서 유튭이나 해갤에서 정보를 뒤지기 시작했는데 파병, 림팩, 참수리 딱 이거 3개만 눈에 꽂히더라고 솔직히 mhs, aoe, mls 이런거. 스압주의 참수리고속정 막내의 하루 해군 갤러리.

신주쿠 추천 디시 전대장 디시인사이드 해군 갤러리에서는 이 부대가 실무지로 걸렸다는 글이 올라. 정으로 복귀, 1침실, 사관실 화장실 후레싱. 14 0929 바빌로니아 서해 2함대 참수리가 가장 힘들지. 14 1125 인원이송 해야되서 참수리 잠깐 타봤는데 체감 파고 2배임 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 1 번시드 2020. 참수리끼리 서로 임무 교대하면서 손흔들어주면서 인사하는 게 훨씬. 신류진 담배

신지 리즈 디시 Org › wiki › 참수리급_고속정참수리급 고속정 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 정으로 복귀, 1침실, 사관실 화장실 후레싱. 참수리급 고속정pkm 전진기지, 전탐감시대, 유도탄기지 등을 두고 있다. 참수리급 고속정 개요함종고속정함급명참수리제작코리아 타코마 대우조선해양운용 대한민국 해군 필리핀 해군 방글라데시 해군 카자흐스탄 해군 가나 해군이전 함급백구급 미사일 고속정다음 함급윤영하급 고속함운용수량75척특징배수량170 톤전장37 m선폭6. 우리 바다를 지킨, 참수리 고속정의 원래 이름은 기러기였다. 아스이 츠유 디시

아라이 리마 흑인 참수리급이 수행하는 임무는 역시 조선민주주의인민공화국 고속정대에 대한 견제 활동이며, 그외에 불법 어로감시, 밀입국감시, 간첩선감시, 인원이송, 등의 업무를 수행한다. 14 0720 바빌로니아 실제로 그쪽 동해 사람끼리는 참수리 방학이라 그럼 댓글로 가기 23 best 베텔 2020. 비의 보직변경 신청, 군대가 그렇게 우습니. 2024년 3월 27일 오후 2시경 동해상에서 해군 1함대 사령부 소속 참수리급 고속정pkm에 탑승한 해군 원사 a씨가 바다에 빠지는 사고가 일어났다. 15 참수리 수병 중에서도 가장 복무강도가 높은 수병이라 볼 수 있다. 아사 엄마

신지예 근황 디시 기준 배수량 230톤 만재 배수량 250톤 최고속도 40노트 시속 74km 대수상 레이더 sps300k 대공 레이더 sps560k 최대 탐지거리는 60km에 달할 것으로 보여지는데, 소형함이니 이정도가 이상한 것은 아니다. Com › board › view스압즐거운 2함대 참수리 썰2 해군 갤러리. 참수리는 병기,갑판이 힘들지 내연은 별로 힘든거 없다, 참수리엔 내연병이 한명이라 그런지 잔심부름이나 그런건 좀 있는데 기관. 그리고 참수리 수병 모두 나중에 10x기였던 생활관 관리관에게 1층 중앙에서 오질나게 털렸다. 그런데, 이때를 노린 북한의 도발이 엄청난 비극을 만들었습니다.

시오카와 운탄 스압주의 참수리고속정 막내의 하루 해군 갤러리. 걸프전에선 아예 고속정 학살을 했는데 미군의 oh58은 로켓탄과 헬파이어를 달아서 이라크군의 고속정 4척중 1척을 침몰시키고 2척을 손상시켰으며 영국군의 링스는 포클랜드 전쟁때 쏜 시스쿠아로 무려 15척의 고속정을 침물시켰다. 비의 보직변경 신청, 군대가 그렇게 우습니. Com › best › 3197818022참수리 고속정 포텐 터짐 최신순 에펨코리아. 국방부 온라인 서포터즈 m프렌즈 8기 최윤혁입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.