Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

쌍커풀 270 인데 수험생 할인으로 200에 해준다더니 그래서 내가 여기는 처음이라 다른 병원 들렸다 오겠다고 말하니까 표정 싹 바뀌면서 아 그러. 05 2001 단독 르세라핌 사쿠라, 앰버서더 발탁. 비절개는 잘못되도 빠른시간안에 재교정 쉽기도하고 수술 자체가 큰 테크닉을 필요로하진않아서 교정량도 한계가 있음read more. 눈코 수술 디에이, 탑클 중 어디서할래.

디에이성형외과 글로벌 앰버서더라고 제발 좀 알아줘 걸스플래닛999 2025.. 디에이성형외과 강남역에 위치한 성형외과이며, 주요 시술분야는 모발이식헤어라인 입니다..

쌍커풀 270 인데 수험생 할인으로 200에 해준다더니 그래서 내가 여기는 처음이라 다른 병원 들렸다 오겠다고 말하니까 표정 싹 바뀌면서 아 그러. 좋아요 31개,디에이성형외과 @daplastic_surgery 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 눈 매몰, 눈매교정, 앞트임 코 절골 눈성형 코성형 윤곽수술 성형후기 성형전후 역삼 역삼동 강남 강남역 강남역성형외과 예쁘면da야 디에이성형외과 성형 daplasticsurgery beauty kbeauty, 이거외에도 많은데 성형어플은 그냥 거르샘, 성형 디에이 성형외과감 마음에 드는점, Com › hospital › 디에이성형외과디에이성형외과의원 2026 찐 후기, 평점, 수술비용 문의는 대다모. 디에이성형외과에서는 인바디 검사를 해서 더욱 정확한 가슴 상담이 가능했던 것 같아요.

Javgg Hitomi

놀러갔다오느라 눈상담한곳은 8군데정도 되는데 하나하나 후기를 못쓰고 있어요 ㅠㅠ 처음엔 조회수2로 시작했는데 어느새 많은 분들이 찾아주셔서 너무 뿌듯하고 기뻐요. 윤곽1종광대, 코수술 한지 8개월정도 지났고요너무 만족한다는 말도 입 아플. 전제조건※ 원하는 부위에 적용 가능한 수술 방법들, 수술의 종류들, 각 종류들의 장 단점에 대해선 전문적이진 않더라도 개략적인것은 알고 있을 것목차1. 꾸라도 앰버서더 있는데 왜 자꾸없는척함.

일단 디에이가 안면윤곽은 타 병원에서 비해 월등히 가격이 비쌈. 좋아요 44개,디에이성형외과 @daplastic_surgery 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 눈매교정 재+코 재수술+앞트임+비염코 수술 후기🥰💕 코성형잘하는곳 코성형 코수술 눈재수술 눈매교정 앞트임 비염 비염코성형 코재수술후기 성형후기 성형전후 역삼 역삼동, 대한성형외과학회 종신회원 대한미용성형회과학회 정회원 전 아이웰성형외과 지금 대다모 댄디에 등록된 6건의 시술후기, 를 확인하세요, Com › doctor › 20037디에이성형외과의원 양희재 2026 찐 후기, 평점, 수술비용 문의는, 그래서 내가 여기는 처음이라 다른 병원 들렸다 오겠다고 말하니까 표정 싹 바뀌면서 아 그러면 270으로 고정하겠습니다 ㅇㅈㄹ ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 건강심리 카테고리로 분류된 성형 갤러리 입니다.

Idolfap.cim

성형 디에이 성형외과감 마음에 드는점. Com › board › view디에이 성형외과 ㄹㅇ 가지마라 시팔 성형 갤러리. 도로명주소 서울특별시 강남구 테헤란로 125 디에이성형외과 빌딩. Com › @daplastic_surgery › video리프팅수술 리프팅전후 리프팅잘하는곳 미니리프팅 fyp 디에이.

전국 1257개 남자성형 전문 병원의 생생한 실제 시술후기 경험담을 확인하고, 병원별 만족도 평가, before & after 사진, 자세한 후기 정보를 한눈에 비교하여 나에게 맞는 병원을 찾아보세요, 코하면서 같이 하려고 하는데 후기가 없네, 디에이성형외과 병원소개 디에이성형외과, 디에이스킨케어, 디에이모발이식센터 직원들은 항상 올바르고 정직한 마음으로 오직 환자를 위한, 환자 중심의 진료를 위해 최선의 노력을 다하겠습니다, 디에이 원장 누가 잘하냐 성형 미니 갤러리, 추천 5 이미지 성형외과 주차장에 벤왔다고 연예인인줄 아는련들.

Iqos 3 Duo Guide

전제조건※ 원하는 부위에 적용 가능한 수술 방법들, 수술의 종류들, 각 종류들의 장 단점에 대해선 전문적이진 않더라도 개략적인것은 알고 있을 것목차1, 일반 디에이 성형외과 첫 의료사고난 면상 범인은 아이돌 s. 17 1620 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리방침 청소년.

코하면서 같이 하려고 하는데 후기가 없네. 05 2001 단독 르세라핌 사쿠라, 앰버서더 발탁. 돈 ㅈㄴ 뿔리고 거울 보라고 개ㅈㄹ 하고 ㅈㄴ 말하는거 개싸가지없다, 일반 디에이 성형외과 첫 의료사고난 면상 범인은 아이돌 s, 06 0002 사쿠라 드디어 앰버서더됐노ㅋㅋ 디에이성형외과 앰버서더 ㅊㅋㅊㅋ 걸스플래닛999 2025, Com › hjkl296510 › 223311520674디에이 성형외과 비절개 눈매교정 3일차 후기 네이버 블로그.

javrank japan 디에이성형외과의원 광대축소+코수술 남자성형 후기입니다. 대한성형외과학회 종신회원 대한미용성형외과학회 정회원 연세대학교 세브란스병원 성형외과 수료 unc medical center 성형외과 연수 chicago rush university. 돈 ㅈㄴ 뿔리고 거울 보라고 개ㅈㄹ 하고 ㅈㄴ 말하는거 개싸가지없다. 꾸라도 앰버서더 있는데 왜 자꾸없는척함. 코하면서 같이 하려고 하는데 후기가 없네. iporatv

idolfap leeseo Com › doctor › 20037디에이성형외과의원 양희재 2026 찐 후기, 평점, 수술비용 문의는. 대다모댄디 회원님이 직접 작성한 디에이성형외과의원 시술후기를 확인하세요. 대다모댄디 회원님이 직접 작성한 디에이성형외과의원 시술후기를 확인해보세요. 대한성형외과학회 종신회원 대한미용성형회과학회 정회원 전 아이웰성형외과 지금 대다모 댄디에 등록된 6건의 시술후기, 를 확인하세요. 쌍커풀 270 인데 수험생 할인으로 200에 해준다더니 그래서 내가 여기는 처음이라 다른 병원 들렸다 오겠다고 말하니까 표정 싹 바뀌면서 아 그러. javrank 김현아

iwara porno 디에이성형외과에서는 인바디 검사를 해서 더욱 정확한 가슴 상담이 가능했던 것 같아요. 이거외에도 많은데 성형어플은 그냥 거르샘. 일단 디에이가 안면윤곽은 타 병원에서 비해 월등히 가격이 비쌈. 서울 강남구 역삼동 64822 디에이성형외과빌딩. 대다모댄디 회원님이 직접 작성한 디에이성형외과의원 시술후기를 확인하세요. ippa no.

javrank 정액 디에이성형외과 @daplastic_surgery 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 리프팅수술 리프팅전후 리프팅잘하는곳 미니리프팅 fyp 디에이성형외과 예쁘면da야 중년성형 동안성형 성형외과추천. Com › @daplastic_surgery › video리프팅수술 리프팅전후 리프팅잘하는곳 미니리프팅 fyp 디에이. 06 0002 사쿠라 드디어 앰버서더됐노ㅋㅋ 디에이성형외과 앰버서더 ㅊㅋㅊㅋ 걸스플래닛999 2025. 일단 디에이가 안면윤곽은 타 병원에서 비해 월등히 가격이 비쌈. 추천 5 이미지 성형외과 주차장에 벤왔다고 연예인인줄 아는련들.

itsbabytana naked 일반 디에이 성형외과 첫 의료사고난 면상 범인은 아이돌 s. 전국 1257개 남자성형 전문 병원의 생생한 실제 시술후기 경험담을 확인하고, 병원별 만족도 평가, before & after 사진, 자세한 후기 정보를 한눈에 비교하여 나에게 맞는 병원을 찾아보세요. 성형 지식도 없고 병원 고르기 막막했음 그래서 걍 비싸고 대형인 병원 위주로 찾다가 강남 성형외과에서 안면윤곽 받기 눈코도 지금 디에이 출신원장. 디에이성형외과 @daplastic_surgery 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 리프팅수술 리프팅전후 리프팅잘하는곳 미니리프팅 fyp 디에이성형외과 예쁘면da야 중년성형 동안성형 성형외과추천. 디에이성형외과의원 에서 근무중인 원장 입니다 전공분야는 성형외과 이며, 주요 시술분야는 눈성형 입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.