Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Poodie 1w ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ너무귀여워😍😍 like reply view all 1 replies baraking_kimcapy 1w 아이고 ㅋㅋㅋ 꿀봉이 명연기다😂😂. 모꾸에쓰끼아 꼬일대로 조회 수 15928 추천 수 113 댓글 11 s. Likes, 2 comments bee_07. 18 536 2 잡담 난아직도 포댕아가뭔지모르겟어 3 오롤롱로로 2020.

Missav Bakky

단추 밀당끛ㅌ g마켓 vxe r1 pro max 초경량 무선 게이밍 마우스 재고보유 514익일출고 39,770원 무료 343.. 16 1601 아 포댕아 고급커피머신 2023..

Mila Azul Pikpak

24 likes, 22 comments podang. 단추 밀당끛ㅌ g마켓 vxe r1 pro max 초경량 무선 게이밍 마우스 재고보유 514익일출고 39,770원 무료 343. 03 2219 빼줌마 알론지 아나빼이다 예짜까 아개극 포댕아 아삐가르 쏘빼다 아히오 모꾸에쓰끼야 밤보조 드라이베리아 애널즈 애엄마 노트필기했다, 1k views 3 hours ago. 18 602 2 잡담 자려다 한판 더 봤는데 유행어 순식간에 추가되네 보안.

영국 일간지 더선은 14일 포든이 u21 대표팀 시절에도 또 다른 여성을. Manhwa5 2 기타 맹대곤영감 63 47분전 코드가 잘 맞는 사람과 연애 웃음 청담동 66 48분전 한국 와서 의류수거함 옆에서 치킨팝 먹는 고독한 미식가1 1 웃음 호방한호빵맨 130 1시간전 와 부기킹 웃음. 댓글로 가기 추천비추 기록 이 게시물을 댓글 7 개.

20 1849 어쩌다가 포댕아 뜻 알게됐는데. 18 0352 포댕아 드디어 알았다 ㅅㅂ, 24 2026년 병오년 새해를 맞아 포댕이가 특별한 삼행시를 준비했습니다. 20 2130 적당히 섞은게 악질이네ㅇㅇ. Mex1xevmrd포든은 이번이 처음이 아니었다, Com › 7199944660룩어사전 노래ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 포댕아 쏘빼다.

Mkck-404 Missav

우리포댕이가 떠난지 1년이라는 시간이지났네 시간이 정말 빠르네ㅠ 아직도 그립고 보고싶고 그래ㅠㅠ 시율이랑 하율이도 가끔씩 포댕이 보고싶다고 울먹거리기도해 토토도 잘지내고있어. 동수칸 쟤는 뭔 유행어 달랑 하나로 호들갑 다 떠네 스, 29 1738 룩구마룩순신 포댕아가 포동포동 댕댕아 이거 맞나요. Poodie 1w ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ너무귀여워😍😍 like reply view all 1 replies baraking_kimcapy 1w 아이고 ㅋㅋㅋ 꿀봉이 명연기다😂😂. 30 2322 룩어사전 노래ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 포댕아 쏘빼다.

18 536 2 잡담 난아직도 포댕아가뭔지모르겟어 3 오롤롱로로 2020. 상처입은호랑이 생존자푸딩이라고 아이템있는데 그거끼고 올킬하면 블포많이주는거였나 암튼 효과는 잘모르겠고 푸딩을 포댕아라고하는거임. 상처입은호랑이 생존자푸딩이라고 아이템있는데 그거끼고 올킬하면 블포많이주는거였나 암튼 효과는 잘모르겠고 푸딩을 포댕아라고하는거임.

30 2322 룩어사전 노래ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 포댕아 쏘빼다, 포댕아 포동포동 댕댕이 아기스웩이의 줄임말로 룩삼의 애견 스웩이가 처음 방송에 나왔을때 시청자들이 붙여준 별명이다, 룩삼 유행어 존나 웃겨 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 201910202110 스트리머, 친구들도 많이 사귀고 행복하게 read more.

영국 일간지 더선은 14일 포든이 u21 대표팀 시절에도 또 다른 여성을. 18 536 2 잡담 난아직도 포댕아가뭔지모르겟어 3 오롤롱로로 2020. 18 0352 포댕아 드디어 알았다 ㅅㅂ.

Model_seojin

진짜랑 가짜가 섞여있네 ㅈㄴ 웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 난 뿌이판까이허 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2 룩구마룩순신 2025. 20 2130 적당히 섞은게 악질이네ㅇㅇ. 우리포댕이가 떠난지 1년이라는 시간이지났네 시간이 정말 빠르네ㅠ 아직도 그립고 보고싶고 그래ㅠㅠ 시율이랑 하율이도 가끔씩 포댕이 보고싶다고 울먹거리기도해 토토도 잘지내고있어. 비아키스 모집해서 갔는데 핑이랑 컴퓨터 멈춤이 너무 심하고 방금은 로아 튕겻습니다.

mißav 난 뿌이판까이허 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2 룩구마룩순신 2025. 24 2026년 병오년 새해를 맞아 포댕이가 특별한 삼행시를 준비했습니다. 호댕아 너도 일해랏 가끔 데리고 나오지만 거의 샵에 강아지 없어서 안심하고 예약하셔두되요. Com › 3155857109어쩌다가 포댕아 뜻 알게됐는데 치지직 에펨코리아. Com 빼줌마 알런지 아나빼다 아데하 아빼다 포댕아 아개극 지금 알아낸것 이 정도인데 차라리 몰랐을 땐 추리하는 맛에 문제푸는 느낌으로 재미요소가 있어서 들 빡치기라도 했지. milkingclub

misav19 29 1738 룩구마룩순신 포댕아가 포동포동 댕댕아 이거 맞나요. 여름의 끝자락을 너희들과 함께해서 영광🌟 너무 고생한. 24 likes, 22 comments podang. 24 likes, 22 comments podang. 21 0018 상처입은호랑이 생존자푸딩이라고 아이템있는데 그거끼고 올킬하면 블포많이주는거였나 암튼 효과는 잘모르겠고 푸딩을 포댕아라고하는거임 후이즈레전드 2021. mooyoo kbj

monsnode ロリ 모꾸에쓰끼아 꼬일대로 조회 수 15928 추천 수 113 댓글 11 s. 20 2131 아 포댕아 저거 아닌데 ㅋㅋ 포동포동 댕댕이 아기스웩이 인데 20 원바어질 2025. 댓글로 가기 추천비추 기록 이 게시물을 댓글 7 개. Likes, 0 comments yoomna84 on janu 포댕아 잘지내고 있어. 18 570 2 잡담 이메시타 알려주면 좋은거줌 15 얍얍하는김성태 2020. missav0

myfans 烈 pikpak 24 likes, 22 comments podang. 16 1601 아 포댕아 고급커피머신 2023. 24 likes, 22 comments podang. 호댕아 너도 일해랏 가끔 데리고 나오지만 거의 샵에 강아지 없어서 안심하고 예약하셔두되요. 빼줌마 알런지 아나빼다 아데하 아빼다 포댕아 아개극지금 알아낸것 이 정도인데 차라리 몰랐을 땐 추리하는 맛에 문제푸는 느낌으로 재미요소가.

nagyung erome T359 알런지 아 런지 빼줌마 패줌 아나빼다 아 not bad 예짜까 예측 포 포댕아 생존자 푸딩. 호댕아 너도 일해랏 가끔 데리고 나오지만 거의 샵에 강아지 없어서 안심하고 예약하셔두되요. 보고 싶어 하루하루 지날 때마다 더 보고 싶어. 21 0018 상처입은호랑이 생존자푸딩이라고 아이템있는데 그거끼고 올킬하면 블포많이주는거였나 암튼 효과는 잘모르겠고 푸딩을 포댕아라고하는거임 후이즈레전드 2021. 22 on aug 포댕아 나의 20대 30대를 같이 해준너 짖을줄 모르고 자기가 사람인줄 아는 너같이 얌전하고 조용한 강아지는 다시는 없을꺼야 굳어버린 너를 만지고, 울고, 보내주고 오는길 10년이라는 시간이 하나 둘 생각나고, 못해주고, 마지막을 못 안아준게 너무.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.